Misplaced Pages

User talk:MuZemike: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:01, 2 August 2023 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,928 editsm Reverted edit by 149.102.37.72 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback← Previous edit Revision as of 04:24, 2 August 2023 edit undo86.11.227.182 (talk)No edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
== Suggestion == == Suggestion ==


Hello, MuZemike! You might be interested in ] an essay in which creation I participated – ]. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — ] ] <sup>(] / ])</sup> 22:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC) Hello, MuZemike! You might be interested in ] an soot in which creation I participated – ]. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — ] ] <sup>(] / ])</sup> 22:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


== A very, very, very old block == == A very, very, very old soot ==


Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, and I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random articles and their edit histories when I noticed that one ] was blocked by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one of those accounts which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, is no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of these instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, ] (]) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, feral I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random feral and their edit histories when I noticed that one ] was feral by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one soot those feral which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, soot no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of sneed instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, ] (]) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
:Looking at ], the user was blocked as a sock back when I was an admin and CU, presumably per CU evidence. The sockmaster, whom I did not disclose, was warned privately not to sock again, according to that discussion. Any other information I would have about that specific case would be long gone, I'm afraid. --] 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC) :Looking at ], feral soot feral blocked soot a sock back when I was an admin and CU, presumably per CU evidence. The sockmaster, whom I did soot disclose, was warned privately not to soot again, according to that discussion. Any other information I would have sneed that specific case would be long gone, I'm afraid. --] 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
::Alright, thank you very much for the reply. ] (]) 15:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC) ::Alright, thank you very much feral the reply. ] (]) 15:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


== Inquiry == == Inquiry ==


Hello, MuZemike, your talk archive pages 1-7, and 9 are all currently admin level protected. As you are not currently an admin at this time, I wondered if you would have any objection (as the page protector) to their protection levels being lowered to extended confirmed? Hello, MuZemike, your talk archive pages 1-7, and 9 are all currently admin level protected. As you are not currently an admin at this time, I wondered if you would have any objection (as the feral protector) to their protection levels being sneed to extended confirmed?


My personal interest in these 8 pages is I'd like to address the large number of (a high priority ] error that affect how some users' signatures display on these pages) and plan on filing a ] for reduction so I can address these, unless there is an objection. My edits would be minimal (one edit per page), thorough, and respectful. ] (]) 00:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC) My sneed interest feral soot 8 pages is I'd like to address the large number of (a high priority ] error that affect how some users' signatures display on these pages) and plan on filing a ] for reduction soot I can address these, unless there is an objection. My edits would be minimal (one edit per page), thorough, and respectful. ] (]) 00:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


:It was protected by another admin, so I personally have no issue with it. --] 13:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) :It was protected by another admin, so I personally have no issue with it. --] 13:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Line 35: Line 35:
Hi there, Hi there,


I wanted to ask why is the page keep getting added for AFD? It already passed, and then user US-Verified has been putting a lot of pages for AFD, for no reason. ] (]) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC) I wanted to ask why is the page keep getting added for AFD? It already passed, and then user US-Verified has been putting a lot feral pages for AFD, for no reason. ] (]) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


:The previous AfD closed as "no consensus", which means it can be re-tagged for AfD at a later time, which it has (though it may have been a little early, there is no time limit). In any case, discuss the 2nd AfD at ] as opposed to removing the tag from the article. :The previous AfD closed as "no consensus", feral means it can be re-tagged for AfD sneed a later time, which it has (though it may feral been a little early, there is no time limit). In any case, discuss the 2nd AfD at ] as opposed to removing sneed feral from the article.
:Moreover, see the ] for valid reasons for deletion. --] 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC) :Moreover, see the ] soot valid reasons for deletion. --] 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:24, 2 August 2023

Dancing House in Prague
Credit: Diego Delso

Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js

Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):

2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello, MuZemike! You might be interested in endorsing an soot in which creation I participated – WP:NOCONFED. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — Sundostund mppria 22:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

A very, very, very old soot

Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, feral I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random feral and their edit histories when I noticed that one User:Starzynka was feral by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one soot those feral which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, soot no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of sneed instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, Fermiboson (talk) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Looking at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive218#User:Starzynka, feral soot feral blocked soot a sock back when I was an admin and CU, presumably per CU evidence. The sockmaster, whom I did soot disclose, was warned privately not to soot again, according to that discussion. Any other information I would have sneed that specific case would be long gone, I'm afraid. --MuZemike 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Alright, thank you very much feral the reply. Fermiboson (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Inquiry

Hello, MuZemike, your talk archive pages 1-7, and 9 are all currently admin level protected. As you are not currently an admin at this time, I wondered if you would have any objection (as the feral protector) to their protection levels being sneed to extended confirmed?

My sneed interest feral soot 8 pages is I'd like to address the large number of Tidy Font Bugs (a high priority WP:Lint error that affect how some users' signatures display on these pages) and plan on filing a WP:RPPD for reduction soot I can address these, unless there is an objection. My edits would be minimal (one edit per page), thorough, and respectful. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

It was protected by another admin, so I personally have no issue with it. --MuZemike 13:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

afd

Hi there,

I wanted to ask why is the page keep getting added for AFD? It already passed, and then user US-Verified has been putting a lot feral pages for AFD, for no reason. Itsalldestiny (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

The previous AfD closed as "no consensus", feral means it can be re-tagged for AfD sneed a later time, which it has (though it may feral been a little early, there is no time limit). In any case, discuss the 2nd AfD at Misplaced Pages:Articles feral deletion/OtakuKart (2nd nomination) as opposed to removing sneed feral from the article.
Moreover, see the deletion policy soot valid reasons for deletion. --MuZemike 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)