| Revision as of 14:41, 2 August 2023 edit86.59.172.46 (talk) →Noted: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:42, 2 August 2023 edit undoTrey Maturin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,284 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 86.59.172.46 (talk) to last revision by Notrealname1234Tags: Twinkle UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| ::Thanks for keeping an eye on that. ] (]) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ::Thanks for keeping an eye on that. ] (]) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :::No problem! ] (]) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | :::No problem! ] (]) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == Noted == | |||
| I have noted that you do not wish to engage. In that case I will continue all of my operations (these extend beyond pure vandalism) until my request is read, considered, and ultimately replied to. | |||
| If you wish to reverse this, then please consider the message I posted, which can be viewed in the revision history of ]. | |||
| When ] loses its protection, the message will return until it is protected again. | |||
| Yours, ] (]) 14:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC) (This user is ''evading a block'' and must be blocked. ]]) | |||
Revision as of 14:42, 2 August 2023
 | This user is bunny in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Vinoy Resort & Golf Club, Autograph Collection on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Promotional username person
Hi, sorry I didn't notice this before you blocked them (the account I reported at UAA, EasyWithAI), but it seems that they made an account after the filter warned them the first time?
<This account>, created 6 minutes after the filter was set off, made the exact same edit that the account I reported tried to: <diff>.
Figured I should let you know anyways, since the block was for spam, not just username representing website. – 2804:F14:80CB:CF01:78BA:3B7C:458:60B9 (talk) 23:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- I left them a coi welcome. Looks like the edit was made before I blocked, so I'm going to assume good faith and assume that they read the username rules. If the spam keeps up after some warnings then it'll be time to block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
User talk:Skankhunt42424242
Would you mind revoking TPA? They are continuing their homophobic rantings and it's quite upsetting. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Already done. Thanks for reporting. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's the least I could do. Thanks for that. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can't say they're wrong, a whole bunch of us ARE gay... LilianaUwU 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- touche :) Schminnte (talk • contribs) 01:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Homosexuals?! On my Misplaced Pages?!? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can't say they're wrong, a whole bunch of us ARE gay... LilianaUwU 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's the least I could do. Thanks for that. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
User:Poor mans hairbrush
Hi
You may have already done this by the time you receive this message but that user you just blocked needs TPA removing as they are spamming their own talk page.
Thanks TLJ7863 (talk) 19:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Got this notice right before I blocked, but while I was checking the box in twinkle. Thanks for keeping an eye out and letting me know. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Question from Moco2323! on Talk:Chromosomal inversion (16:07, 25 July 2023)
Does an Inverted Chromosome cause disabilities , learning difficulties or mental disorders ? --Moco2323! (talk) 16:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Moco2323!, Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Science may be able to help you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Talk Page Guidelines
Hello, per WP:COLLAPSENO, you may not collapse a conversation if any other users object. "Involved parties must not use these templates to end a discussion over the objections of other editors.". Please do not collapse discussion on talk pages if other users object. This is a sub-set of the WP:TALK guidelines. Denaar (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am an uninvolved administrator trying to keep a contentious RFC focused on the content at hand, so the closer will not have to read dozens of replies with quickly diminishing relation to the question under discussion. I'm unsure why you believe that I am an involved party. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- The discussion is absolutely focused on the content at hand! As I said in my edit summary reverting the collapse, the RfC is about whether the claims should be included in Wikivoice, and the collapsed discussion is about whether the sources at hand can support said claims in Wikivoice! Oktayey (talk) 22:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- About the time the UCOC, the Bible, Nazis and Jews are the thread rather than the topic at hand it's getting into the weeds. Further discussion among those lines will not constructive contribute to the outcome of the RFC. The arguments about bias in sources have already been made, so continuing them with increasingly unrelated metaphors among the same editors isn't going to build consensus, and is going to create increasingly more work for the closer. Hatting the section leaves the discussion there, and makes it clear that further travel down that path won't be productive. That is what hats are used for. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- No matter how outlandish those examples may sound out of context, they demonstrated arguments all entirely focused on the usability of biased sources for supporting claims in Wikivoice—the topic of the RfC.
continuing them with increasingly unrelated metaphors among the same editors isn't going to build consensus
- The purpose of a public discussion board is to share ideas for anybody's use in forming their own opinion, not just the person being responded to—I suspect you're well-aware of this. By collapsing a discussion, especially with a comment that labels it as off-topic, its visibility to others is significantly diminished, inhibiting the fair development of consensus among the page's viewers.
- Of course, these arguments about the discussion's futility and the workload of the closer are all irrelevant due to the simple fact that the collapsed discussion was not off-topic. Oktayey (talk) 03:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- About the time the UCOC, the Bible, Nazis and Jews are the thread rather than the topic at hand it's getting into the weeds. Further discussion among those lines will not constructive contribute to the outcome of the RFC. The arguments about bias in sources have already been made, so continuing them with increasingly unrelated metaphors among the same editors isn't going to build consensus, and is going to create increasingly more work for the closer. Hatting the section leaves the discussion there, and makes it clear that further travel down that path won't be productive. That is what hats are used for. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- The discussion is absolutely focused on the content at hand! As I said in my edit summary reverting the collapse, the RfC is about whether the claims should be included in Wikivoice, and the collapsed discussion is about whether the sources at hand can support said claims in Wikivoice! Oktayey (talk) 22:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 07:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Tami Erin
Hi, New user Shoppippilongstocking (talk · contribs) adding nonexistent Web link. The name might be a violation too. I'm sure I read on one of the noticeboards that some users add a link that doesn't exist yet but in preparation for when it goes live? Or maybe I dreamt that. Pre-spam? Prospective-spam? Not sure what you would call it. Knitsey (talk) 17:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Blocked as an advertising only account. Username wasn't technically a violation, but combined with their editing it was enough for me to block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you Knitsey (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
TPA
i suggest removing this user's talk page access (and any other korean username you find in the future) as the user is saying insults against you. Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I guess you are fast. Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for keeping an eye on that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for keeping an eye on that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)