Misplaced Pages

User talk:Harej: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:51, 20 July 2023 editPhotographyEdits (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers11,258 edits Getty Research Institute listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 09:54, 9 August 2023 edit undoMagnolia677 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers138,865 edits Credibility bot: new sectionTags: Reverted New topicNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
== Good article reassessment for ] == == Good article reassessment for ] ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC) ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

== Credibility bot ==

Hi there. I saw a notice at ] about credibility bot, and then read the information at ]. What I wasn't able to find is what criteria this bot uses to determine the credibility of a source. Does it just rely on ], or is it more complex? Thank you. ] (]) 09:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:54, 9 August 2023

Archiving icon
Archives
2004-2008
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
2009-2014
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
2015-2020
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2021-present
2021 2022 2023


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message.


Good article reassessment for Getty Research Institute

Getty Research Institute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Credibility bot

Hi there. I saw a notice at WP:CWNBD about credibility bot, and then read the information at WP:CREDBOT. What I wasn't able to find is what criteria this bot uses to determine the credibility of a source. Does it just rely on WP:RSP, or is it more complex? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)