| Revision as of 02:14, 23 March 2007 editJustanother (talk | contribs)9,266 edits wikibreak← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:18, 23 March 2007 edit undoJustanother (talk | contribs)9,266 edits archive out for breakNext edit → |
| Line 67: |
Line 67: |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |
|
|
|
|
{{busy}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Quick note to Shenme == |
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, thanks. To see something in practice, doesn't necessarily mean it is a recognized guideline. So now I know yet another page to read - thanks. I love how it says ''use "Show preview" ''. Ha! I've kept pages open for more than an hour, trying to "say it right". It ... doesn't always work ... :-( ] 04:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:No prob. But you can see the problem, I am sure, when you change a remark invisibly after another has responded or referenced it. The strike-out is the only important part, just highlight and hit <s>str</s> button, only takes a sec. Take care. --] 04:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Justahulk account== |
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest that you post a request on AN/I for unblocking the account. I don't object to another administrator over viewing the block and considering unblocking. On a side note, I have told ] to stop following you around on Misplaced Pages to begin fights, I suggest that you as well not be easily instigated by the user and try to remain ] and not use ] or hostile edit summaries when dealing with him or any other users. Thank you.--] 04:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Will do. Take care. --] 04:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Deletion review== |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the tip. I will take another look and see if I can figure it out when I am not so tired. One good thing is that now the article makes Barbara sound like an important historical figure, so she should be happy about that at least. :-) ] 06:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:I was think that you may well want to take it to DRV for a few more sets of eyes as that close was odd with the closing admin changing after being petitioned by a highly involved POV editor. --] 06:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks. I think that is a good idea. For me doing things here is not so easy. I don't have any experience with computer programming and that kind of thing. ] 11:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Yes, the unique nature of this place can be off-putting. It has some parallels in moderated user forums but only to a limited degree. But you do not have to be fancy and, on admin boards, simpler is better anyway. A simple request to take a look based on the odd-closing and perhaps the question if it was closed a bit early (but I would not stress that and might leave it out). What this place is more about is diplomacy and tactfulness. I think you have those qualities. Believe it or no I, can be very diplomatic and I am usually the one chosen in my professional business to handle delicate situations. I allowed myself a bit of a luxury to lampoon inappropriate editors but I am done with that now as it allows the ill-intentioned to muddy the waters of what should be a clear debate by repeatedly pointing at and exaggerating my harsh words. I know that you have no such problem. If you want to put your request in a sandbox on your user page I will check it over for you. --] 12:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
Steve, I have to run now. Catch you in a few hours. --] 22:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Please post the link to the DRV message board, if that is what it is called, and I will mention Barbara's article there. I was planning on just giving the link to the deletion discussion and saying that although the vote was around 3 to 1 in favor of keeping, the people in favor of deletion brought up some serious issues that were not answered by the other side. What do you think about that? BTW I don't plan to vote on Tilman's article. He is clearly not notable enough but he likes his article and I don't want him take my vote personally. ] 22:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Barnstar!== |
|
|
|
|
|
Sir, you're rare, in my experience - I've seen people flog themselves over AfDs when they don't go their way. I'd share a beer with you, but...well, here's a barnstar instead. =^_^= |
|
|
|
|
|
<move to user page> |
|
|
|
|
|
A note, by the way, I caught the queries on this as well post close. To be perfectly frank, I hope Barbara contacts the appropriate people soon, so she can get it removed. --] 21:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks, that barnstar means something to me. We can have the beer later. Best. --] 21:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== New Category == |
|
|
|
|
|
* Thanks! Yes, I have read the Intro, and considered it before adding anybody. I am fairly well educated on this subject, so I could clairify anything I add if you want. Just ask on my Talk page. ] 20:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
**No prob. There was one Roman that the article did not clearly indicate had started a religion or belief system and then there is Adam, that did not teach anything that I know of. I did the sort thing already for Moon and Crowley but if you want to do others it is easy to do when adding the cat. Thanks again for jumping in. I was really surprised that I could not find a cat like this extant. --] 20:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*** A lot of what I added was based on the ] here on wikipedia. ] 23:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
****Ah. Well now there is a cat to go along with the list (smile). Beats the heck out of "Category:Self-proclaimed messiahs" --] 01:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
==AfD discussions== |
|
|
Please don't use harsh sarcasm in afd discussions (e.g. Tilman Hausherr)--whichever side you are supporting, this doesnt aid it.''']''' 00:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for your input. --] 01:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Wikibreak == |
|
== Wikibreak == |
