Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Misplaced Pages: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:14, 28 August 2023 editAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers637,649 edits OneClickArchiver archived Requested move at Talk:Arbitration Committee#Requested move 12 June 2023 to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Misplaced Pages/Archive 2← Previous edit Revision as of 14:14, 28 August 2023 edit undoAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers637,649 edits OneClickArchiver archived Google and Misplaced Pages listed at Requested moves to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Misplaced Pages/Archive 2Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
:Thanks for the heads up ---] <sub>(])</sub> 15:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) :Thanks for the heads up ---] <sub>(])</sub> 15:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::The editor who insists on boldly redoing the lead is still reverting to his version. One main problem of the first sentence being a run-on has been solved. The RfC does not have the input I'd think such vast changes at the flagship article on Misplaced Pages deserves. The lead seems fine as is, with some tweaks, but the entire rewrite replacing it doesn't seem, in my opionion, to improve the page and its long-term language. ] (]) 10:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC) ::The editor who insists on boldly redoing the lead is still reverting to his version. One main problem of the first sentence being a run-on has been solved. The RfC does not have the input I'd think such vast changes at the flagship article on Misplaced Pages deserves. The lead seems fine as is, with some tweaks, but the entire rewrite replacing it doesn't seem, in my opionion, to improve the page and its long-term language. ] (]) 10:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

== ] listed at Requested moves==
]A ] discussion has been initiated for ] to be moved to ]. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion ].<!-- Talk:Google and Misplaced Pages#Requested move 30 June 2023 crosspost --> —] 00:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
:<small>To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{tlp|bots|2=deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up ] for this WikiProject.</small>

Revision as of 14:14, 28 August 2023

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Misplaced Pages and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Shortcut
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Misplaced Pages.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Misplaced Pages. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about Misplaced Pages at the Reference desk.

Complete lead change requested in an RfC at Misplaced Pages

A total rewrite of the lead to replace the present lead is being discussed at the talk page of the Misplaced Pages page, which may interest readers of this project. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The editor who insists on boldly redoing the lead is still reverting to his version. One main problem of the first sentence being a run-on has been solved. The RfC does not have the input I'd think such vast changes at the flagship article on Misplaced Pages deserves. The lead seems fine as is, with some tweaks, but the entire rewrite replacing it doesn't seem, in my opionion, to improve the page and its long-term language. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Categories: