| Revision as of 17:39, 16 August 2023 editHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,254 edits →Credibility bot: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:26, 30 August 2023 edit undoSj (talk | contribs)Administrators25,841 edits →Credibility botTags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| :], at the moment, since the bot is only set up for ], it pulls from ]. As more projects are added, more source lists will be added, and we will also need to figure out how (and to what extent) project reports inherit ratings from the main ] list. ] (]) 17:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) | :], at the moment, since the bot is only set up for ], it pulls from ]. As more projects are added, more source lists will be added, and we will also need to figure out how (and to what extent) project reports inherit ratings from the main ] list. ] (]) 17:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :: Passed by and saw this... It would be great if each wikiproject started maintaining its own sources table (so they don't have to reach consensus with the entire wiki on RSP, and could include sources only of local interest to their topic; e.g. "any domain used in more than a dozen citations in this category"). Figuring out how to inherit ratings seems a fine problem to have. (What about cross-wikiproject ratings, for domains not in the global RSP?) <span style="color:#666">– ]]</span> 00:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:26, 30 August 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message.
Good article reassessment for Getty Research Institute
Getty Research Institute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Credibility bot
Hi there. I saw a notice at WP:CWNBD about credibility bot, and then read the information at WP:CREDBOT. What I wasn't able to find is what criteria this bot uses to determine the credibility of a source. Does it just rely on WP:RSP, or is it more complex? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Magnolia677, at the moment, since the bot is only set up for WP:VSAFE, it pulls from WP:VSAFE/PSOURCES. As more projects are added, more source lists will be added, and we will also need to figure out how (and to what extent) project reports inherit ratings from the main WP:RSP list. Harej (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Passed by and saw this... It would be great if each wikiproject started maintaining its own sources table (so they don't have to reach consensus with the entire wiki on RSP, and could include sources only of local interest to their topic; e.g. "any domain used in more than a dozen citations in this category"). Figuring out how to inherit ratings seems a fine problem to have. (What about cross-wikiproject ratings, for domains not in the global RSP?) – SJ + 00:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)