Misplaced Pages

Rasputitsa: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:07, 9 September 2023 editMzajac (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users66,545 edits Effects: alphabetize list of countriesTag: Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 05:44, 10 September 2023 edit undoIskandar323 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,623 edits Armed conflict: Copying material from Mud season - see that page for attributionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


During ], the months-long muddy period slowed the ] during the ] (September 1941 to January 1942) on the ], and may have helped save the city from falling under a German military occupation.<ref>{{Cite book|last = Overy|first = Richard |author-link= Richard Overy |date= 1997 |title= Russia's War |location= London |publisher= Penguin |isbn= 1-57500-051-2 |pages= 113–114 |quote= Both sides now struggled in the autumn mud. On October 6 the first snow had fallen, unusually early. It soon melted, turning the whole landscape into its habitual trackless state – the ''rasputitsa'', literally the 'time without roads'.... It is commonplace to attribute the German failure to take Moscow to the sudden change in the weather. While it is certainly true that German progress slowed, it had already been slowing because of the fanatical resistance of Soviet forces and the problem of moving supplies over the long distances through occupied territory. The mud slowed the Soviet build-up also, and hampered the rapid deployment of men and machines.}}</ref> The advent of ] had the disadvantage that while tanks could operate effectively in summer or in winter, they proved less useful in spring and autumn,<ref>{{cite book|last = Pinkus|first = Oscar|chapter = Death of Barbarossa|title = The War Aims and Strategies of Adolf Hitler|location = Jefferson, North Carolina|publisher = McFarland|date = 2005|page = 241|isbn = 9780786420544|quote = By the time the Germans approached their major objectives such as Rostov, Moscow, or Leningrad the campaigning season was over and Barbarossa was off his horse. had not planned to fight in Russia during the fall and winter. He had stated in his Directive No. 21 that this was to be a 'lightning campaign' to be won in two to four months maximum. the cause of failure was the proposition that the Soviet Union could and would be defeated in a blitzkrieg.}}</ref> when the functioning of an efficient railway system came into its own.<ref>{{cite book|last = Willmott|first = H. P.|date = 1989|title = The Great Crusade: A New Complete History of the Second World War|edition = revised|location = Washington, D.C.|publisher = Potomac Books, Inc.|publication-date = 2008|page = 153|isbn = 9781597971911|quote = While the Germans were to blame many factors, and particularly the ''rasputitsa'', for the failure of Operation Taifun, the fact was that logistically the German attack on Moscow was in difficulty before it even began. German rail and road facilities were not sufficient to sustain the offensive beyond Smolensk .}}</ref> During ], the months-long muddy period slowed the ] during the ] (September 1941 to January 1942) on the ], and may have helped save the city from falling under a German military occupation.<ref>{{Cite book|last = Overy|first = Richard |author-link= Richard Overy |date= 1997 |title= Russia's War |location= London |publisher= Penguin |isbn= 1-57500-051-2 |pages= 113–114 |quote= Both sides now struggled in the autumn mud. On October 6 the first snow had fallen, unusually early. It soon melted, turning the whole landscape into its habitual trackless state – the ''rasputitsa'', literally the 'time without roads'.... It is commonplace to attribute the German failure to take Moscow to the sudden change in the weather. While it is certainly true that German progress slowed, it had already been slowing because of the fanatical resistance of Soviet forces and the problem of moving supplies over the long distances through occupied territory. The mud slowed the Soviet build-up also, and hampered the rapid deployment of men and machines.}}</ref> The advent of ] had the disadvantage that while tanks could operate effectively in summer or in winter, they proved less useful in spring and autumn,<ref>{{cite book|last = Pinkus|first = Oscar|chapter = Death of Barbarossa|title = The War Aims and Strategies of Adolf Hitler|location = Jefferson, North Carolina|publisher = McFarland|date = 2005|page = 241|isbn = 9780786420544|quote = By the time the Germans approached their major objectives such as Rostov, Moscow, or Leningrad the campaigning season was over and Barbarossa was off his horse. had not planned to fight in Russia during the fall and winter. He had stated in his Directive No. 21 that this was to be a 'lightning campaign' to be won in two to four months maximum. the cause of failure was the proposition that the Soviet Union could and would be defeated in a blitzkrieg.}}</ref> when the functioning of an efficient railway system came into its own.<ref>{{cite book|last = Willmott|first = H. P.|date = 1989|title = The Great Crusade: A New Complete History of the Second World War|edition = revised|location = Washington, D.C.|publisher = Potomac Books, Inc.|publication-date = 2008|page = 153|isbn = 9781597971911|quote = While the Germans were to blame many factors, and particularly the ''rasputitsa'', for the failure of Operation Taifun, the fact was that logistically the German attack on Moscow was in difficulty before it even began. German rail and road facilities were not sufficient to sustain the offensive beyond Smolensk .}}</ref>

Prior to the ], some analysts identified the logistical challenges of the mud season as a likely hindrance to any large-scale invasion in spring.<ref name="will mud">{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2022/02/07/will-ukraines-muddy-ground-halt-russian-tanks|title=Will Ukraine's muddy ground halt Russian tanks?|date=7 February 2022|accessdate=5 March 2022|newspaper=The Economist}}</ref> When Russia crossed the border, many of its mobile units found themselves stranded in fields and limited to major roads, where resistance and logistical issues significantly slowed the advance ] and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://taskandpurpose.com/news/russian-tanks-stuck-mud-ukraine/|title='Tanks and mud are not friends' – Ukraine's terrain is proving to be a problem for Russian armor|website=Task & Purpose|date=2 March 2022|accessdate=5 March 2022|first=David|last=Roza}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60596629|title=Ukraine: Why has Russia's 64km convoy near Kyiv stopped moving?|date=4 March 2022|accessdate=5 March 2022|website=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=David |last=Hambling |url= https://theguardian.com/news/2022/apr/12/mud-season-in-ukraine-leaves-russian-tanks-stuck-in-mire|title=Mud season in Ukraine leaves Russian tanks stuck in more |work=The Guardian |date=2022-04-12}} </ref>


== See also == == See also ==

Revision as of 05:44, 10 September 2023

Mud season in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia
An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.
Find sources: "Rasputitsa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FRasputitsa%5D%5DAFD

Spring thaw in Komi Republic, March 2015
Thick snow cover and waterlogged soil in Sokol, Russia, October 2012

Rasputitsa (Template:Lang-ru ) is the Russian-language term for a mud season, when travel on unpaved roads or across the country becomes difficult due to muddy conditions caused by rain in Autumn and/or snowmelt during Spring. It specifically refers to those conditions that occur in Belarus, Ukraine, and European Russia. Rasputitsa has repeatedly "rescued" Russia during wars; tanks, troop carriers and artillery pieces all become mired down in the soggy earth. It will turn into one of Ukraine's major assets as it fights the Russian invasion.

Etymology

Village street in Moscow oblast, November 1941
Horses and cart in mud near Kursk, March 1942

The term rasputitsa is derived from the root: путь (put, ), meaning "road" or "way" or "travel"; + рас- (ras, ), a word prefix meaning "discrepancy" or "divergence"; + -иц (-its, ), a diminutive suffix; + а (), a feminine noun ending. In the Finnish language, it is referred to as a "kelirikko" or "rospuutto".

In Russia, the term refers to two periods during the year — spring and autumn — and also refers to common road conditions during such a period, specifically the heavy rains of October and the thaw of the frozen steppe in March.

Effects

These conditions in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine are caused by the poor drainage of underlying heavy clay soils (chernozem) found in the region. Roads are subject to weight limitations and closures during the period in certain Russian districts. The phenomenon was a notable hindrance in the early 20th century, since 40% of rural villages in the erstwhile Soviet Union were not served by paved roads. In Canada there is definitely a rasputitsa period, though it does not occur everywhere or necessarily in the fall, and it is not considered a rasputitsa by name.

Armed conflict

The rasputitsa seasons are well-known as a defensive advantage in wartime. As such, "General Mud" and "Marshal Mud" are common nicknames. There is speculation that a spring thaw probably saved Novgorod from being overrun during the Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' in the 13th century. The season also proved to be a great hindrance in November 1812, in and after the Battle of Krasnoi, when many horses, carriages and cannon were stuck in the mud and left behind during the French retreat from Russia. Rasputitsa reduced the mobility of both armies but it seem to be more favorable to the defender.

During World War II, the months-long muddy period slowed the German advance into the Soviet Union during the Battle of Moscow (September 1941 to January 1942) on the Eastern Front, and may have helped save the city from falling under a German military occupation. The advent of Blitzkrieg had the disadvantage that while tanks could operate effectively in summer or in winter, they proved less useful in spring and autumn, when the functioning of an efficient railway system came into its own.

Prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, some analysts identified the logistical challenges of the mud season as a likely hindrance to any large-scale invasion in spring. When Russia crossed the border, many of its mobile units found themselves stranded in fields and limited to major roads, where resistance and logistical issues significantly slowed the advance toward Kyiv and elsewhere.

See also

References

  1. ^ Siegelbaum, Lewis H. (2011). Cars for Comrades: The Life of the Soviet Automobile. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801461484.
  2. Jones, Seth G.; Wasielewski, Philip G. (2022-01-13). "Russia's Possible Invasion of Ukraine". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/13149/do-siberia-and-canada-have-a-rasputitsa
  4. ^ FAQ regarding what made Napoleon fail in invading Russia, Napoleon -series website
  5. ^ Thiers, M. Adolphe (1864). History of the Consulate and the Empire of France under Napoleon. Vol. IV. Translated by D. Forbes Campbell; H. W. Herbert. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 243. whilst it was almost impossible to drag the gun-carriages through the half-frozen mud (regarding November 20, 1812)
  6. May, Timothy Michael, ed. (2016). The Mongol Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. Empires of the World. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 65. ISBN 9781610693400. During the Mongol invasion of the Rus' principalities in 1238–1240, Novgorod escaped destruction by the Mongols due to an early spring, which transformed the routes to Novgorod into a muddy bog.
  7. Overy, Richard (1997). Russia's War. London: Penguin. pp. 113–114. ISBN 1-57500-051-2. Both sides now struggled in the autumn mud. On October 6 the first snow had fallen, unusually early. It soon melted, turning the whole landscape into its habitual trackless state – the rasputitsa, literally the 'time without roads'.... It is commonplace to attribute the German failure to take Moscow to the sudden change in the weather. While it is certainly true that German progress slowed, it had already been slowing because of the fanatical resistance of Soviet forces and the problem of moving supplies over the long distances through occupied territory. The mud slowed the Soviet build-up also, and hampered the rapid deployment of men and machines.
  8. Pinkus, Oscar (2005). "Death of Barbarossa". The War Aims and Strategies of Adolf Hitler. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland. p. 241. ISBN 9780786420544. By the time the Germans approached their major objectives such as Rostov, Moscow, or Leningrad the campaigning season was over and Barbarossa was off his horse. had not planned to fight in Russia during the fall and winter. He had stated in his Directive No. 21 that this was to be a 'lightning campaign' to be won in two to four months maximum. the cause of failure was the proposition that the Soviet Union could and would be defeated in a blitzkrieg.
  9. Willmott, H. P. (1989). The Great Crusade: A New Complete History of the Second World War (revised ed.). Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, Inc. (published 2008). p. 153. ISBN 9781597971911. While the Germans were to blame many factors, and particularly the rasputitsa, for the failure of Operation Taifun, the fact was that logistically the German attack on Moscow was in difficulty before it even began. German rail and road facilities were not sufficient to sustain the offensive beyond Smolensk .
  10. "Will Ukraine's muddy ground halt Russian tanks?". The Economist. 7 February 2022. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  11. Roza, David (2 March 2022). "'Tanks and mud are not friends' – Ukraine's terrain is proving to be a problem for Russian armor". Task & Purpose. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  12. "Ukraine: Why has Russia's 64km convoy near Kyiv stopped moving?". BBC News. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  13. Hambling, David (2022-04-12). "Mud season in Ukraine leaves Russian tanks stuck in more". The Guardian.
Categories: