| Revision as of 18:26, 24 March 2007 editArigato1 (talk | contribs)380 edits →{{{header-text|Notability of []}}}: Relaxing. Just delete the article.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:09, 24 March 2007 edit undoValentinian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,499 edits Do not use edit summaries to smear others.Next edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| :Furthermore, some would argue that using Agent Orange could not have been considered a war crime at the time, becuase it was understood by the US military that the chemicals were not toxic. In that sense, nobody could have forseen the horrendous effects Agent Orange would have had on US soldiers and the Vietnamese. ] 14:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | :Furthermore, some would argue that using Agent Orange could not have been considered a war crime at the time, becuase it was understood by the US military that the chemicals were not toxic. In that sense, nobody could have forseen the horrendous effects Agent Orange would have had on US soldiers and the Vietnamese. ] 14:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Do not use edit summaries to smear others. == | |||
| I will not accept your accusations of suckpuppetry as you did here . If you do something like it again, you'll be reported. ] <sup>] / ]</sup> 23:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:09, 24 March 2007
Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
If you have a point of view that you want to place in this article, discuss it on the talk page first. Uncited, subjective opinions added to the article will continue to be removed by other editors. Cla68 23:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- This includes the addition of pejorative categories also. Cla68 23:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
You have revereted the page four times in the last 24 hours (, , ) I am placing a block on your account for 24 hours under Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule policy--Philip Baird Shearer 17:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Your personal attacks in the section "War Crime?" Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not acceptable behaviour.
- And user: why do you say "WE". You want us to believe that you were in WW2? You probaly just a pathetic American internet patriot who still live home with your mother. --Arigato1 17:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
and
- Your grandfather and father died because they were weak like you. --Arigato1 18:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Please read Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines in particular Behavior that is unacceptable --Philip Baird Shearer 20:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Rather than continuing this edit war over Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, why don't you try to explain on the Talk page why you think you're right and we're wrong. For starters, what crime do you think was committed; and are you talking about WW2 strategic bombing in general, or about the atomic bombs in particular? In the latter case, what distinguishes Hiroshima from, say, London or Tokyo?
—wwoods 06:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Edit to Vietnam War
I reverted your edit which stated the "US did many war crimes" in the section on chemical defoliants becuase the mention of war crimes is irrelevant to the use and effects of chemical defoliants themselves. Furthermore, it is still a point of controversy as to whether the use of Agent Orange constitutes a war crime. TheKillerAngel 20:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I guess the 9/11 not was a terrorist attack then? --Arigato1 20:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- 9/11 was a terrorist attack, and I understand you're making a rhetorical question, but I fail to see the connection. For the record, I do believe the US commited atrocities in Vietnam. In fact, such incidents as the My Lai are documented. I do believe the use of Agent Orange was unethical. But the way you just threw in "US did many war crimes" has little connection to the rest of the paragraph, nor is it grammatically correct. You can try to mention war crimes in a separate section, if it does not exist already.
- Furthermore, some would argue that using Agent Orange could not have been considered a war crime at the time, becuase it was understood by the US military that the chemicals were not toxic. In that sense, nobody could have forseen the horrendous effects Agent Orange would have had on US soldiers and the Vietnamese. TheKillerAngel 14:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Do not use edit summaries to smear others.
I will not accept your accusations of suckpuppetry as you did here . If you do something like it again, you'll be reported. Valentinian 23:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)