Misplaced Pages

User talk:Larry Hockett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:53, 22 September 2023 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,989 edits Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit Revision as of 06:36, 22 September 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,091 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Larry Hockett/Archive 19) (botNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
|archive = User talk:Larry Hockett/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Larry Hockett/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

== Revert on Margaret Sanger ==

Hi!
I noticed you reverted an IP recently about their characterization of Sanger in the lead. Can you explain why you did that? The characterization does seem to be factually accurate, so what's the problem?

And was your use of the rollback button intentional? I'm asking because I've hit the button unintentionally once or twice in the past.

Also, how would you feel about the milder language "supporter of negative eugenics"?
] (]) 09:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

:Mostly ], but also because these sorts of assertions have been discussed extensively on article talk pages and have never really gained ]. Didn't mean to use rollback, but it looks like the IP editor had been blocked under a similar IP before making the edit. Re: attempts to soften the wording, presumably without talk page discussion, I think it might be circumventing that process of building consensus. ] (]) 09:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
::Can you give some illustrative examples of "these sorts of assertions"?
::Also, just now I randomly came across ], who is described as a eugenicist at the end of the list of activities/occupations in the lead. The characterization is cited to something.
::I suppose I could raise the issue on the article's TP, but I'd prefer to deal with that kind of thing when I have more headspace and stomach for controversial discussions. After all (at least according to some editors), ].
::Cheers, ] (]) 13:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
:::I could give examples, but I wonder if that would be seen as a little bit silly since we're talking about discussions on one article talk page. The discussions on race and eugenics are pretty easily located by looking through the seven pages of archives. Re: the Gilman article, I agree that it is cited to something; that something is a ''Britannica'' entry that doesn't contain the string ''eug'' anywhere on the page. It's certainly a bold move to use that citation where they did, but it is otherwise not a thing to be emulated. ] (]) 14:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


== August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == == August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive ==

Revision as of 06:36, 22 September 2023

User

Talk

Questions? Comments? Advice? Talk to me.

Contribs

Promoted

Thank you.

Gallery

Interesting pics.

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19



This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Bringing David Ogden Stiers Back to Life

Would anybody please have David Ogden Stiers being brought back to life so that he would turn 81 at the end of October 2023? 2601:640:4080:2780:FD6B:5774:2D37:155A (talk) 06:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days

Hello Larry Hockett:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.