| Revision as of 03:19, 7 July 2023 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,543 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2023/June. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:35, 25 September 2023 view source Philomathes2357 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,512 edits →I don't want to believe you: new sectionTags: Reverted New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == I don't want to believe you == | |||
| I have faith that common sense and reason will prevail. I don't even have a strong opinion one way or the other about the Douma chemical attack, so I'm perplexed by those that do, and by those who want to exclude any mention of there being a controversy that has serious, thoughtful people on both sides. I'd like to assume good faith and think that this attitude is the result of simple ignorance, rather than malice or a conscious desire to engage on one particular side of an information war. ] (]) 04:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:35, 25 September 2023
/
I don't want to believe you
I have faith that common sense and reason will prevail. I don't even have a strong opinion one way or the other about the Douma chemical attack, so I'm perplexed by those that do, and by those who want to exclude any mention of there being a controversy that has serious, thoughtful people on both sides. I'd like to assume good faith and think that this attitude is the result of simple ignorance, rather than malice or a conscious desire to engage on one particular side of an information war. Philomathes2357 (talk) 04:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)