Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bill Williams: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:56, 23 September 2023 editSpringee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,471 edits BLPN discussion: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 04:18, 30 September 2023 edit undoBill Williams (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,455 edits BLPN discussionNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


You may be interested in this discussion based on your comments in this old RfC . I'm not looking for a specific article level change rather a general opinion about situations like this. ] (]) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC) You may be interested in this discussion based on your comments in this old RfC . I'm not looking for a specific article level change rather a general opinion about situations like this. ] (]) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
:{{u|Springree}} thanks for letting me know, I definitely would have joined the discussion but don't want to get you into any trouble with any overzealous editors who think you were trying to canvass. I fully agree that the label "far-right" should never be hyperlinked because it's a completely misleading term that American media likes to use, while the hyperlink leads to an article talking about Nazism and other far more extreme positions supporting literal genocide compared to the braindead American conspiracy theorists who are also called "far-right" but have expressed 0 support for murdering millions of people. ] 04:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:18, 30 September 2023

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
  • articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
  • post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people
  • abortion
  • climate change
  • COVID-19, broadly construed
  • governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues
  • the Arab–Israeli conflict
  • gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
They should not be given alerts for those areas.
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

BLPN discussion

You may be interested in this discussion based on your comments in this old RfC "far-right"_to_the_lead. I'm not looking for a specific article level change rather a general opinion about situations like this. Springee (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Springree thanks for letting me know, I definitely would have joined the discussion but don't want to get you into any trouble with any overzealous editors who think you were trying to canvass. I fully agree that the label "far-right" should never be hyperlinked because it's a completely misleading term that American media likes to use, while the hyperlink leads to an article talking about Nazism and other far more extreme positions supporting literal genocide compared to the braindead American conspiracy theorists who are also called "far-right" but have expressed 0 support for murdering millions of people. Bill Williams 04:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)