| Revision as of 11:44, 4 October 2023 editSpiderone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers192,724 edits Updating nomination page with notices (assisted)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:42, 4 October 2023 edit undoEzhiki (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,314 edits keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Population of 2, which is non-zero, according to ''Results of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census for the Sakhalin Region'', and which was probably rather more at the time the settlement was founded. Did nobody bother to look at the corresponding article in Russian (with 9 references) at ]? Being named after a railway kilometre-post is not a reason for deletion. Consider ] in British Columbia, several place names at ] and ]. We have enough evidence to keep the article. Dismissing it as only a railway point is unjustified and the dreaded "original research". <span style="font-family: Times;">] (] • ])</span> 04:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Population of 2, which is non-zero, according to ''Results of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census for the Sakhalin Region'', and which was probably rather more at the time the settlement was founded. Did nobody bother to look at the corresponding article in Russian (with 9 references) at ]? Being named after a railway kilometre-post is not a reason for deletion. Consider ] in British Columbia, several place names at ] and ]. We have enough evidence to keep the article. Dismissing it as only a railway point is unjustified and the dreaded "original research". <span style="font-family: Times;">] (] • ])</span> 04:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *Needs a brutal cleanup, a copyedit, and a couple factual corrections, but I can confirm this is a place that's categorized as an inhabited locality and previously had people living there, which is all that's needed to keep a geostub according to our geonotability criteria. '''Keep'''.—] • (]); <span class="nowrap">October 4, 2023</span>; 21:42 (UTC) 21:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:42, 4 October 2023
17 km, Sakhalin Oblast
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- 17 km, Sakhalin Oblast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As the peculiar name suggests, what evidence there is indicates this is/was a rail stop and not a settlement. Looking at the Russian version, I see that it was designated a село, but even given the vague nature of the term, there's no evidence that there was or is a village/whatever there; indeed, I cannot find a feature on GMaps or anything similar which I can identify as this place. Mangoe (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm functionally illiterate in Russian, so I can't read the sources for myself, but all the article says is "This is a place in the middle of nowhere" and basically nothing else. If something important goes on there or we get more information, we can resurrect it. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 02:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Population of 2, which is non-zero, according to Results of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census for the Sakhalin Region, and which was probably rather more at the time the settlement was founded. Did nobody bother to look at the corresponding article in Russian (with 9 references) at ru:17-й км (Сахалинская область)? Being named after a railway kilometre-post is not a reason for deletion. Consider 100 Mile House in British Columbia, several place names at Mile End (disambiguation) and Two Mile. We have enough evidence to keep the article. Dismissing it as only a railway point is unjustified and the dreaded "original research". Google Translate's version of the Russian article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Needs a brutal cleanup, a copyedit, and a couple factual corrections, but I can confirm this is a place that's categorized as an inhabited locality and previously had people living there, which is all that's needed to keep a geostub according to our geonotability criteria. Keep.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 4, 2023; 21:42 (UTC) 21:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)