| Revision as of 22:39, 26 March 2007 editLeebo (talk | contribs)9,409 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:45, 26 March 2007 edit undoLeebo (talk | contribs)9,409 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :It sounds like you're saying some combination of "it should have an article because it has a fanbase" and "it should have an article because many other non-notable articles exist", neither of which are valid arguments. It's not that I "have it out" for your article. It came up on the log deletion discussions (there are hundreds every day) and I commented in it. I'm not running around blindly looking for articles to delete. You can see, I have contributed several new articles myself. I looked at the article and asked myself if it meets Misplaced Pages's policies and I felt it didn't and explained myself. If you disagree, that's fine, but I expect an argument ground in the same policies. <font color="CornflowerBlue"><b>]</b></font> <small><sup><font color="B22222">]</font></sup></small>/<small><font color="B22222">]</font></small> 22:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | :It sounds like you're saying some combination of "it should have an article because it has a fanbase" and "it should have an article because many other non-notable articles exist", neither of which are valid arguments. It's not that I "have it out" for your article. It came up on the log deletion discussions (there are hundreds every day) and I commented in it. I'm not running around blindly looking for articles to delete. You can see, I have contributed several new articles myself. I looked at the article and asked myself if it meets Misplaced Pages's policies and I felt it didn't and explained myself. If you disagree, that's fine, but I expect an argument ground in the same policies. <font color="CornflowerBlue"><b>]</b></font> <small><sup><font color="B22222">]</font></sup></small>/<small><font color="B22222">]</font></small> 22:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::People have done that to me (See:]). It's called ]. <font color="CornflowerBlue"><b>]</b></font> <small><sup><font color="B22222">]</font></sup></small>/<small><font color="B22222">]</font></small> 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | ::People have done that to me (See:]). It's called ]. <font color="CornflowerBlue"><b>]</b></font> <small><sup><font color="B22222">]</font></sup></small>/<small><font color="B22222">]</font></small> 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::I gave my opinion, I'm not sure what else there is to say. I'm not sure either why you singled me out to ask all of these questions, it wasn't me who nominated your article for deletion. I'm only one of many who commented. <font color="CornflowerBlue"><b>]</b></font> <small><sup><font color="B22222">]</font></sup></small>/<small><font color="B22222">]</font></small> 22:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 26 March 2007
Image tagging for Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 05:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Reply
I'm not upset with you; learning Misplaced Pages's policies in the face of many experienced editors who are discussing removing your contributions is undoubtedly frustrating. My statement was that it has no third party sources, not that it's an advertisement. One good point in the discussion was that while MySpace and the bands are notable, the sponsorship of the shows by others through MySpace isn't necessarily notable. I'm sorry that you feel that your time has been wasted. Leebo /C 22:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- It sounds like you're saying some combination of "it should have an article because it has a fanbase" and "it should have an article because many other non-notable articles exist", neither of which are valid arguments. It's not that I "have it out" for your article. It came up on the log deletion discussions (there are hundreds every day) and I commented in it. I'm not running around blindly looking for articles to delete. You can see, I have contributed several new articles myself. I looked at the article and asked myself if it meets Misplaced Pages's policies and I felt it didn't and explained myself. If you disagree, that's fine, but I expect an argument ground in the same policies. Leebo /C 22:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- People have done that to me (See:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/DynaMed). It's called disrupting Misplaced Pages to prove a point. Leebo /C 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I gave my opinion, I'm not sure what else there is to say. I'm not sure either why you singled me out to ask all of these questions, it wasn't me who nominated your article for deletion. I'm only one of many who commented. Leebo /C 22:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- People have done that to me (See:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/DynaMed). It's called disrupting Misplaced Pages to prove a point. Leebo /C 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)