| Revision as of 21:18, 27 March 2007 editGeorge (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,550 edits Adding suspected sock puppet tag.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:55, 27 March 2007 edit undoDereks1x (talk | contribs)355 edits Hi there!Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==] case== | ] 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)==] case== | ||
| {| align="left" | {| align="left" | ||
| || ] | || ] | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. | You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. | ||
| — ]<sup> <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 21:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | — ]<sup> <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 21:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *When you are accused of sockpuppetry, it is pretty much the same as being accused of a crime. You should not assume that you are presumed innocent until proven guilty because wikipedia standards of due process can vary between entities or jurisdictions. | |||
| I have examined the March 27, 2007 "evidence" and have taken the liberty of adding a comment in the complaint under "Comment by an uninterested (uninvolved) party" in your support. | |||
| It is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets | |||
| I have also been falsely accused of sockpuppetry by a gang of 3 people who have the same opinion and are very aggressive. It looks to me that the other accused sockpuppets are involved in writing on different subjects and rarely or never participate in the articles that they are accused of sockpuppetry. | |||
| My case is under my user name (Dereks1x). I am not asking you to also write a "Comment in Support by an uninterested (uninvolved) party" but I, obviously don't have any control over you!!! :) | |||
Revision as of 23:55, 27 March 2007
Dereks1x 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)==Sockpuppetry case==
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
— George Saliba 21:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- When you are accused of sockpuppetry, it is pretty much the same as being accused of a crime. You should not assume that you are presumed innocent until proven guilty because wikipedia standards of due process can vary between entities or jurisdictions.
I have examined the March 27, 2007 "evidence" and have taken the liberty of adding a comment in the complaint under "Comment by an uninterested (uninvolved) party" in your support.
It is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets
I have also been falsely accused of sockpuppetry by a gang of 3 people who have the same opinion and are very aggressive. It looks to me that the other accused sockpuppets are involved in writing on different subjects and rarely or never participate in the articles that they are accused of sockpuppetry.
My case is under my user name (Dereks1x). I am not asking you to also write a "Comment in Support by an uninterested (uninvolved) party" but I, obviously don't have any control over you!!! :)