| Revision as of 23:03, 12 November 2023 editToosieJoosie (talk | contribs)325 editsm Removed/ reverted talk as per respecting user page's guidelines,policyTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:41, 17 November 2023 edit undoToosieJoosie (talk | contribs)325 edits →Dispute resolution: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Hello, Solidest ~ Per our chat yesterday, I have gone back to my various work on ], ], ], ], ], and ] to convert the inboxes accordingly. There are several Sibelius opus-numbered compositions pages that still lack an infobox, although if/when I even get to them, I will add inboxes accordingly. From your perspective, are inboxes generally useful on composition articles? If so, I can make it a point to add them sooner rather than later (i.e., not waiting until I undertake expansions of the articles). Warmly, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span> 19:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC) | Hello, Solidest ~ Per our chat yesterday, I have gone back to my various work on ], ], ], ], ], and ] to convert the inboxes accordingly. There are several Sibelius opus-numbered compositions pages that still lack an infobox, although if/when I even get to them, I will add inboxes accordingly. From your perspective, are inboxes generally useful on composition articles? If so, I can make it a point to add them sooner rather than later (i.e., not waiting until I undertake expansions of the articles). Warmly, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span> 19:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| : Hello. Thanks for the edits. I was going to do this myself a bit later as we discussed yesterday, but I'm glad you got ahead of me. Yes, I think infoboxes are always useful in such articles. I know that some users take (or have taken) the opposite approach regarding classical compositions, and this optionality seems to be even written into the guidelines as far as I remember, but I don't really get the point of it. The infobox is actually a brief summary of the subject of the article, and can always be filled in, and it will always be useful to the reader. ] (]) 20:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC) | : Hello. Thanks for the edits. I was going to do this myself a bit later as we discussed yesterday, but I'm glad you got ahead of me. Yes, I think infoboxes are always useful in such articles. I know that some users take (or have taken) the opposite approach regarding classical compositions, and this optionality seems to be even written into the guidelines as far as I remember, but I don't really get the point of it. The infobox is actually a brief summary of the subject of the article, and can always be filled in, and it will always be useful to the reader. ] (]) 20:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == Dispute resolution == | |||
| You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the ] and the ] may be of use. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 23:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:41, 17 November 2023
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Catalogue → Opus in infoboxes
Hello, Solidest ~ Per our chat yesterday, I have gone back to my various work on Jean Sibelius, Leevi Madetoja, Uuno Klami, Ernst Mielck, Lars-Erik Larsson, and Dag Wirén to convert the inboxes accordingly. There are several Sibelius opus-numbered compositions pages that still lack an infobox, although if/when I even get to them, I will add inboxes accordingly. From your perspective, are inboxes generally useful on composition articles? If so, I can make it a point to add them sooner rather than later (i.e., not waiting until I undertake expansions of the articles). Warmly, ~ Silence of Järvenpää 19:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. Thanks for the edits. I was going to do this myself a bit later as we discussed yesterday, but I'm glad you got ahead of me. Yes, I think infoboxes are always useful in such articles. I know that some users take (or have taken) the opposite approach regarding classical compositions, and this optionality seems to be even written into the guidelines as far as I remember, but I don't really get the point of it. The infobox is actually a brief summary of the subject of the article, and can always be filled in, and it will always be useful to the reader. Solidest (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Both articles Afro Tech + Afro - prolonged edit disputes & Constant block motions against me and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, ToosieJoosie (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)