| Revision as of 17:26, 15 December 2023 editBelbury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers75,648 edits Adding local short description: "Concept in Lacanian thought", overriding Wikidata description "concept in Lacanian thought"Tag: Shortdesc helper← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 15 December 2023 edit undoTele76 (talk | contribs)102 edits Undid revision 1190052089 by Belbury (talk) Not sure how this is a 'spam reference'. The referenced page appears to be authored (see bottom of page) by a person who holds a PhD in the very subject matter at hand (confirmed by a Google search showing their published book on Lacan and his sexuated mathemes, other published journal articles, and academia.edu webpage).Tags: Undo RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] writes in his introduction to the translation of Lacan's '']'' that "Lacan saw his "matheme" as something that would ensure the integral transmission of his teachings ... proof against the "noise" or interference inherent in any process of communication".<ref>], "Introduction", Jacques Lacan, ''The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis'' (1994) p. xxxii</ref> They are ]e, designed as ]ic ] of his ]s and analyses. They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the ]s, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both ] and Lacan. For example: "$<>a" is the matheme for fantasy in the Lacanian sense, in which "$" refers to the subject as split into the subject of utterance and uttered subject (hence the matheme is a barred S), "]" stands for the object-cause of desire, and "<>" stands for the relationship between the two. | ] writes in his introduction to the translation of Lacan's '']'' that "Lacan saw his "matheme" as something that would ensure the integral transmission of his teachings ... proof against the "noise" or interference inherent in any process of communication".<ref>], "Introduction", Jacques Lacan, ''The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis'' (1994) p. xxxii</ref> They are ]e, designed as ]ic ] of his ]s and analyses. They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the ]s, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both ] and Lacan. For example: "$<>a" is the matheme for fantasy in the Lacanian sense, in which "$" refers to the subject as split into the subject of utterance and uttered subject (hence the matheme is a barred S), "]" stands for the object-cause of desire, and "<>" stands for the relationship between the two. | ||
| A more complex set of mathemes are Lacan's "formulae of sexuation" which he outlined in the March 13, 1973, session of his '']''.<ref>{{Cite book|title = The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972–1973|last = Lacan|first = Jacques|publisher = W. W. Norton & Company|year = 1998|isbn = 978-0393319163|location = New York|pages = 78–89}}</ref> Composed of two pairs of propositions written in a unique logico-mathematical shorthand inspired by ], one pair was dubbed 'masculine' and the other 'feminine.' These formulae Lacan originally constructed from ] over the course of an entire year of study. The "matheme", for Lacan, is not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher ] identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure. | A more complex set of mathemes are Lacan's "formulae of sexuation" which he outlined in the March 13, 1973, session of his '']''.<ref>{{Cite book|title = The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972–1973|last = Lacan|first = Jacques|publisher = W. W. Norton & Company|year = 1998|isbn = 978-0393319163|location = New York|pages = 78–89}}</ref> Composed of two pairs of propositions written in a unique logico-mathematical shorthand inspired by ], one pair was dubbed 'masculine' and the other 'feminine.' These formulae Lacan originally constructed from ] over the course of an entire year of study.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.swingtradesystems.com/lacan/lacan-and-aristotle.html|title = The Aristotelian Roots of Lacan's Formulas of Sexuation|last =|first =|date =|website =|publisher =|access-date =}}</ref> The "matheme", for Lacan, is not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher ] identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure. | ||
| ==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 15 December 2023
Concept in Lacanian thoughtThe matheme (from Template:Lang-el "lesson") is a concept introduced in the work of the 20th century French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. The term matheme "occurred for the first time in the lecture Lacan delivered on November 4th, 1971 Between 1972 and 1973 he gave several definitions of it, passing from the use of the singular to the use of the plural and back again".
Characteristics
David Macey writes in his introduction to the translation of Lacan's The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis that "Lacan saw his "matheme" as something that would ensure the integral transmission of his teachings ... proof against the "noise" or interference inherent in any process of communication". They are formulae, designed as symbolic representations of his ideas and analyses. They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the hard sciences, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both Freud and Lacan. For example: "$<>a" is the matheme for fantasy in the Lacanian sense, in which "$" refers to the subject as split into the subject of utterance and uttered subject (hence the matheme is a barred S), "a" stands for the object-cause of desire, and "<>" stands for the relationship between the two.
A more complex set of mathemes are Lacan's "formulae of sexuation" which he outlined in the March 13, 1973, session of his Seminar XX. Composed of two pairs of propositions written in a unique logico-mathematical shorthand inspired by Gottlob Frege, one pair was dubbed 'masculine' and the other 'feminine.' These formulae Lacan originally constructed from Aristotelian logic over the course of an entire year of study. The "matheme", for Lacan, is not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher Alain Badiou identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure.
Criticism
Though sometimes disparaged as a case of "physics envy" or accused of introducing false rigor into a discipline that is more literary theory than hard science, there is also something of a sense of humor in Lacan's formulas: of one 'sigla which I have introduced in the form of an algorithm', Lacan himself has declared that 'it is created to allow for a hundred and one different readings, a multiplicity that is admissible as long as the spoken remains caught in its algebra'.
Serge Leclaire, who is one of the most respected and distinguished of all French analysts, remarked in 1975, for example, that whilst the mathemes might have a certain pedagogic utility, they were basically no more than "graffiti"'.
References
- Ėlisabeth Roudinesco, Jacques Lacan (1997) p. 360
- David Macey, "Introduction", Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (1994) p. xxxii
- Lacan, Jacques (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972–1973. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 78–89. ISBN 978-0393319163.
- "The Aristotelian Roots of Lacan's Formulas of Sexuation".
- Jacques Lacan, Écrits: A Selection (London 1997) p. 313
- Macey, p. xxxii
External links
- Lacanian Matheme Fonts provided by the Australian Centre for Psychoanalysis
- Lacan's Sexuation Formulas by Jack W. Stone.