Revision as of 22:55, 31 March 2007 editHurricanehink (talk | contribs)Administrators61,891 editsm GA nominee← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:12, 1 April 2007 edit undoHurricanehink (talk | contribs)Administrators61,891 edits B-classNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{hurricane|class= |
{{hurricane|class=B|importance=Low|merge=Yes}} | ||
{{GAnominee|2007-03-31}} | {{GAnominee|2007-03-31}} | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 1 April 2007
Hurricane Lili (1984) is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 2007-03-31 Please use the This article is not categorized by subtopic. Please edit the |
Todo
Just not enough information, it seems. Outside of meteorological information there are only 3 sentences of substances in the article. Jdorje 20:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, despite that fault I still put this at B because it has that Epsilion or Zeta look to it (the infomation that is). Storm05 16:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Wait, why does this storm have an article again? No damages or deaths? This should be merged... — jdorje (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- (And yes, epsilon and zeta should be merged too.) — jdorje (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Because storms can be notable without causing damage. Hurricanehink 22:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but these aren't. Just being an off-season storm does not mean a storm needs an article. — jdorje (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Because storms can be notable without causing damage. Hurricanehink 22:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)