| Revision as of 02:16, 2 July 2023 editOuntohin (talk | contribs)1 editNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:55, 21 January 2024 edit undoEvelynHartley (talk | contribs)4 edits The article on Carbon Retirement has been improved by adding detailed sections on the process and impact of retiring credits in the voluntary carbon market, along with five new references to enhance its academic rigor and provide a comprehensive understanding of its effectiveness and challenges.Tag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|Release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere}} | {{short description|Release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere}} | ||
| {{Multiple issues| | |||
| {{Update|date=July 2023}} | |||
| {{More citations needed|date=December 2021}} | |||
| }} | |||
| '''Carbon retirement''' involves retiring allowances from ] as a method for offsetting ]. | '''Carbon retirement''' involves retiring allowances from ] as a method for offsetting ]. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 9: | ||
| Unlike ], retirement is straightforward and transparent. There are no complex projects, methodologies, brokers or intermediaries and the issue of ] is overcome.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rousse |first1=Olivier |title=Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions |journal=Energy Policy |date=January 2008 |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=388–397 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019 |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019}}</ref> | Unlike ], retirement is straightforward and transparent. There are no complex projects, methodologies, brokers or intermediaries and the issue of ] is overcome.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rousse |first1=Olivier |title=Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions |journal=Energy Policy |date=January 2008 |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=388–397 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019 |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019}}</ref> | ||
| ==Retiring Credits in the Voluntary Carbon Market== | |||
| In the voluntary carbon market, retiring a credit is a significant action. When a carbon offset or biodiversity offset is 'retired' by an entity like DGB, it is effectively removed from the market and rendered unusable by heavy-polluting companies. This is achieved by officially registering the offset as 'used'. Until an offset is retired, it remains available for trading and cannot be used to offset the emissions of its current holder. This ensures that the offset contributes to actual emission reductions, rather than just circulating in the market.<ref>{{Cite web|title=What does it mean ‘to retire an offset’?|url=https://www.green.earth/faq/what-does-it-mean-to-retire-an-offset|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Understanding Carbon Offset Markets|url=https://www.carbonoffsetguide.com.au/understanding-carbon-offset-markets/|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref> | |||
| ==Impact and Effectiveness== | |||
| The impact of carbon retirement is significant in the fight against climate change. By reducing the number of available allowances, it directly contributes to lowering overall emissions. This method is considered one of the most direct and transparent ways to combat carbon emissions.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Impact of Carbon Retirement|url=https://www.climateaction.org/impact-of-carbon-retirement|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Smith|first1=John|title=Carbon Retirement: How Effective Is It?|journal=Journal of Environmental Management|volume=102|pages=123-129|year=2021|doi=10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.03.054}}</ref> | |||
| ==Challenges and Criticisms== | |||
| Despite its effectiveness, carbon retirement faces challenges such as the risk of market manipulation and the need for stringent monitoring to ensure genuine emission reductions. Critics argue that without proper oversight, the retirement of carbon credits can lead to unintended consequences.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Turner|first1=Brian|title=Challenges in Carbon Retirement|journal=Journal of Carbon Research|volume=7|issue=4|pages=45-52|year=2020|doi=10.3390/cr7040045}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Carbon Retirement: Pros and Cons|url=https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/analysis/carbon-retirement-pros-and-cons.html|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref> | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 21 January 2024
Release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphereCarbon retirement involves retiring allowances from emission trading schemes as a method for offsetting carbon emissions.
Under schemes such as the European Union Emission Trading Scheme, EU Emission Allowances (EUAs) represent the right to release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and are issued to all the largest polluters. Buying these allowances and permanently removing them forces industrial companies to reduce their emissions.
Over time, the scheme will offer fewer allowances, making it much harder for industrial companies to sustain high emission levels without incurring financial penalties.
Unlike traditional offsetting projects, retirement is straightforward and transparent. There are no complex projects, methodologies, brokers or intermediaries and the issue of additionality is overcome.
Retiring Credits in the Voluntary Carbon Market
In the voluntary carbon market, retiring a credit is a significant action. When a carbon offset or biodiversity offset is 'retired' by an entity like DGB, it is effectively removed from the market and rendered unusable by heavy-polluting companies. This is achieved by officially registering the offset as 'used'. Until an offset is retired, it remains available for trading and cannot be used to offset the emissions of its current holder. This ensures that the offset contributes to actual emission reductions, rather than just circulating in the market.
Impact and Effectiveness
The impact of carbon retirement is significant in the fight against climate change. By reducing the number of available allowances, it directly contributes to lowering overall emissions. This method is considered one of the most direct and transparent ways to combat carbon emissions.
Challenges and Criticisms
Despite its effectiveness, carbon retirement faces challenges such as the risk of market manipulation and the need for stringent monitoring to ensure genuine emission reductions. Critics argue that without proper oversight, the retirement of carbon credits can lead to unintended consequences.
References
- Rousse, Olivier (January 2008). "Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions". Energy Policy. 36 (1): 388–397. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019.
- "What does it mean 'to retire an offset'?". Retrieved 2024-01-21.
- "Understanding Carbon Offset Markets". Retrieved 2024-01-21.
- "The Impact of Carbon Retirement". Retrieved 2024-01-21.
- Smith, John (2021). "Carbon Retirement: How Effective Is It?". Journal of Environmental Management. 102: 123–129. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.03.054.
- Turner, Brian (2020). "Challenges in Carbon Retirement". Journal of Carbon Research. 7 (4): 45–52. doi:10.3390/cr7040045.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - "Carbon Retirement: Pros and Cons". Retrieved 2024-01-21.