| Revision as of 00:19, 3 April 2007 edit195.248.109.163 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:55, 3 April 2007 edit undoWJBscribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,293 editsm Reverted edits by 195.248.109.163 (talk) to last version by WJBscribeNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| *'''Delete.''' I ''love'' Richfife's comments; they truly say it all. This is an effort to promote something. ] 05:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete.''' I ''love'' Richfife's comments; they truly say it all. This is an effort to promote something. ] 05:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
| Yep, it was a hoax. It was aimed at some guy I know. None of it is real. But at least it gave you something to do. Perhaps now you will get a job or girlfriend or something. | |||
| And before you reply with a clever comment, I HOPE YOU DIE OF CANCER. | |||
Revision as of 02:55, 3 April 2007
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 08:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
James Denton (gay activist)
- James Denton (gay activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I nominate this on behalf of Weggie, who says 'no notability - possible hoax'. Richard Cavell 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Probable hoax. Nothing about him on Google. Epbr123 23:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As per Epbr123 - Also, potential serious libel over content as accusations of criminal activity Weggie 21:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Contest of Deletion. There is little to no internet documentation of this event simply because it happened in such as small area. The local press at the time in Harrogate consisted of small newspaper articles only. This will not be apparent on Google or any other search engine. I believe that this is the first step to get small events like this published on to the Internet; you have to start somewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.248.109.163 (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Misplaced Pages is absolulely, positively, do not pass go, do not collect $200 not "first step to get small events like this published". It is the last stop after events have received notice. Please read Misplaced Pages:Notability. - Richfife 00:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per everything said above. — Wenli 00:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Richfife, maybe you do have start somewhere, but that somewhere is not here. Mwelch 00:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. --Haemo 02:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, nonnotable, misuse of Misplaced Pages. NawlinWiki 03:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I love Richfife's comments; they truly say it all. This is an effort to promote something. Realkyhick 05:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.