Revision as of 20:13, 26 March 2007 editBrian0918 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,856 editsm standardize citations← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:04, 3 April 2007 edit undoMerzul (talk | contribs)4,327 editsm rm spamNext edit → |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
* Consider rewriting "]" from scratch, as prose paragraphs rather than a set of lists. |
|
* Consider rewriting "]" from scratch, as prose paragraphs rather than a set of lists. |
|
* Work on improving daughter articles like ], ], ]. |
|
* Work on improving daughter articles like ], ], ]. |
|
|
|
|
If you leave out gnostic atheism, then you are being inaccurate and unreliable. ] 18:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Paul Keller kellerp@uwstout.edu You have hidden it from the main text. If you google gnostic atheism, you will get over 400,000 hits, which is second only to strong atheism. Gnostic atheism is a significant form of atheism. |
|