Revision as of 19:02, 3 April 2007 editKittybrewster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,052 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 07:53, 4 April 2007 edit undoPaul venter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,005 edits Image sizeNext edit → |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
To attempt to settle this once and for all I will go through my edits that ] has just reverted one by one. A picture of his wife is unnecessary. This is an article about George Albu and a photo of Lady Albu just isn't warranted. Secondly, photos should not be placed so they squeeze the text like that, and they don't need to be that large either. My edits to the opening line (ie places of birth/death) are backed up by ]. And the categories I added are also necessary. The "Article Under Construction" is not necessary, a template can be used if the article is under ACTIVE editing. --] 18:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
To attempt to settle this once and for all I will go through my edits that ] has just reverted one by one. A picture of his wife is unnecessary. This is an article about George Albu and a photo of Lady Albu just isn't warranted. Secondly, photos should not be placed so they squeeze the text like that, and they don't need to be that large either. My edits to the opening line (ie places of birth/death) are backed up by ]. And the categories I added are also necessary. The "Article Under Construction" is not necessary, a template can be used if the article is under ACTIVE editing. --] 18:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
;This matter has certainly not been settled. Your other edits can stand, but your removal of photos because you do not feel they are warranted or "squeeze" the text is entirely a matter of taste with no backing from any MoS guidelines. Of course, I may be wrong; if so please enlighten me. For the time being I am replacing the photos. ] 17:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
;This matter has certainly not been settled. Your other edits can stand, but your removal of photos because you do not feel they are warranted or "squeeze" the text is entirely a matter of taste with no backing from any MoS guidelines. Of course, I may be wrong; if so please enlighten me. For the time being I am replacing the photos. ] 17:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Image size == |
|
|
|
|
|
Kindly go to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] to see just a few articles that do not use thumbnail-size images. Please find someone else to bother.] 07:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC) |