Misplaced Pages

Talk:Reliability of : Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:39, 9 February 2024 editRaladic (talk | contribs)11,167 edits Reverting edit(s) by Favonian (talk) to rev. 1205054078 by 2001:569:BB59:3800:6C16:4950:31A6:71F6: This was correctly removed. Misplaced Pages is not a forum (RW 16.1)Tags: RW Undo← Previous edit Revision as of 09:16, 9 February 2024 edit undo84.68.88.138 (talk)No edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Misplaced Pages|importance=High}}
}} }}
{{Summary in|Study: Misplaced Pages Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read] - - TechNewsDaily ('']'') 01 June 2010
{{Summary in|Misplaced Pages}}
{{to do|4}}
{{Refideas|1= - - TechNewsDaily ('']'') 01 June 2010
}} }}
{{Copied {{Copied

Revision as of 09:16, 9 February 2024

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Misplaced Pages.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
A summary of this article appears in - - TechNewsDaily (LiveScience) 01 June 2010

|Study: Misplaced Pages Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read] - - TechNewsDaily (LiveScience) 01 June 2010

]].
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
This is not the page to discuss whether a source in an article is reliable. If you want to do that, go to WP:RSN or the talk page of the article in question.

Media mentionThis topic has been mentioned by a media organization:
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6


This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

More information to possibly add in

I made a draft about this same topic (yet it cannot become an article since this one exists,) but I figured I would post it here if anyone wants to look at it and possibly add the information into this article, since my draft is a lost cause at this point. I just want to contribute into this article, since my own cannot be published. It has some pretty important points, in my opinion.

~

Draft:Misplaced Pages: a surprisingly reliable site by AriLovesTacos (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ari. I see the above draft has been moved to User:AriLovesTacos/Wikipedia: a surprisingly reliable site. Feel free to be bold and update any article you think you can improve. That's how Misplaced Pages was written. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
113.160.204.217 (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Please be more specific about what you would like us to change. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories: