| Revision as of 22:53, 6 April 2007 editDomitius (talk | contribs)1,825 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:24, 7 April 2007 edit undoMakalp (talk | contribs)7,867 editsm →[]: voteNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| **'''Comment''' Google hits ] 22:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' Google hits ] 22:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' even if it was sourced, it hardly qualifies as notable.--] 22:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' even if it was sourced, it hardly qualifies as notable.--] 22:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''', it is a reality, has enough sources, need to development.<font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="4">]</font>]] 10:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:24, 7 April 2007
Red Armenian army
- Red Armenian army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable enough, no reliable sources barely any information only bias sources if found based on research it should be deleted. Artaxiad 22:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Artaxiad 22:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Google hits Artaxiad 22:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete even if it was sourced, it hardly qualifies as notable.--Domitius 22:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, it is a reality, has enough sources, need to development.Must. 10:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)