| Revision as of 20:23, 20 February 2024 editHistoryofIran (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers97,601 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:58, 22 February 2024 edit undoManiacdude (talk | contribs)98 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: ReplyTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Both attempting to push a legend as a fact in order to Indianize ] ] (]) 20:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC) | Both attempting to push a legend as a fact in order to Indianize ] ] (]) 20:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :I don't know who Indo21221 is, also my intention wasn't to "push a legend as a fact', the legend is agreed to be the origins by a lot of sources (If you want I'll post more) hence why I thought there was decent credibility to post it. If anything the saka origin has less validity as it's mainly based on language evidence (in that case it can also be said to be a Gandharan kingdom also with how Gandhari Prakrit was a major language of the kingdom). ] (]) 17:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ||
Revision as of 17:58, 22 February 2024
Indo12122
Indo12122 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Indo12122/Archive.
20 February 2024
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Zenithxxx (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Zenithxxx is a brand new user created five days after the latest Indo12122 sock was blocked . Not a traditional journey of a new user, for example by their third edit they are apparently already aware of Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Lead section
Both attempting to push a legend as a fact in order to Indianize Kingdom of Khotan HistoryofIran (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know who Indo21221 is, also my intention wasn't to "push a legend as a fact', the legend is agreed to be the origins by a lot of sources (If you want I'll post more) hence why I thought there was decent credibility to post it. If anything the saka origin has less validity as it's mainly based on language evidence (in that case it can also be said to be a Gandharan kingdom also with how Gandhari Prakrit was a major language of the kingdom). Maniacdude (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: