Revision as of 01:03, 26 February 2024 editAlice Slippen (talk | contribs)4 editsm provided linkTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:51, 27 February 2024 edit undoOneTrueTreeTree (talk | contribs)27 edits Rearranged history section, minor copy-typing, added linksTags: Visual edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: copyeditNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description| |
{{short description|Carbon emission reduction scheme}} | ||
{{Multiple issues|{{Update|date=July 2023}} | {{Multiple issues|{{Update|date=July 2023}} | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Over time, the scheme will offer fewer allowances to corporations, making it much more difficult for industrial companies to sustain high emission levels without incurring financial penalties. | Over time, the scheme will offer fewer allowances to corporations, making it much more difficult for industrial companies to sustain high emission levels without incurring financial penalties. | ||
Carbon retirement involves retiring ] |
Carbon retirement involves retiring ] – certificates representing reduced ] or ] (GHGs) removed from the atmosphere. The company could then purchase and “retire” carbon credits as compensation for emissions from sources that will eventually be eliminated. | ||
=== History in Media === | |||
An article published in the journal ] |
2008 - An article published in the journal ] argued that retirement is "straightforward and transparent" when compared to ]. There are no complex projects, methodologies, brokers, intermediaries, or ]<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rousse |first1=Olivier |date=January 2008 |title=Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019 |journal=Energy Policy |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=388–397 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019}}</ref> | ||
McKinsey estimated<ref>{{Cite web |title=Carbon credits: Scaling voluntary markets {{!}} McKinsey |url=https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/a-blueprint-for-scaling-voluntary-carbon-markets-to-meet-the-climate-challenge |access-date=2024-02-21 |website=www.mckinsey.com}}</ref> |
2020 - ] estimated that in 2020, buyers retired carbon credits for ~95 million tons of carbon-dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e), more than doubling 2017 values.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Carbon credits: Scaling voluntary markets {{!}} McKinsey |url=https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/a-blueprint-for-scaling-voluntary-carbon-markets-to-meet-the-climate-challenge |access-date=2024-02-21 |website=www.mckinsey.com}}</ref> | ||
2022 - British media ] reported that 146 million carbon credits were retired from the four largest registries for carbon-offset projects in the voluntary market, more than double the volume just three years earlier.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pearson |first=Josh Gabbatiss, Tom |date=2023-09-28 |title=Analysis: How some of the world’s largest companies rely on carbon offsets to ‘reach net-zero’ |url=https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/carbon-offsets-2023/companies.html |access-date=2024-02-21 |website=Carbon Brief |language=en}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 03:51, 27 February 2024
Carbon emission reduction schemeThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Carbon retirement involves retiring allowances from emission trading schemes to offset carbon emissions. Once retired, the allowances are permanently removed from the market. Under schemes such as the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EUETS), polluters may purchase EU Emission Allowances (EUAs), which represent the right to release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Purchasing these allowances and thus permanently removing them from the market forces other companies to reduce their emissions.
Over time, the scheme will offer fewer allowances to corporations, making it much more difficult for industrial companies to sustain high emission levels without incurring financial penalties.
Carbon retirement involves retiring carbon credits – certificates representing reduced greenhouse gas emissions or greenhouse gasses (GHGs) removed from the atmosphere. The company could then purchase and “retire” carbon credits as compensation for emissions from sources that will eventually be eliminated.
History in Media
2008 - An article published in the journal Energy Policy argued that retirement is "straightforward and transparent" when compared to traditional offsetting projects. There are no complex projects, methodologies, brokers, intermediaries, or additionality
2020 - McKinsey Sustainability estimated that in 2020, buyers retired carbon credits for ~95 million tons of carbon-dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e), more than doubling 2017 values.
2022 - British media CarbonBrief reported that 146 million carbon credits were retired from the four largest registries for carbon-offset projects in the voluntary market, more than double the volume just three years earlier.
References
- Rousse, Olivier (January 2008). "Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions". Energy Policy. 36 (1): 388–397. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.019.
- "Carbon credits: Scaling voluntary markets | McKinsey". www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- Pearson, Josh Gabbatiss, Tom (2023-09-28). "Analysis: How some of the world's largest companies rely on carbon offsets to 'reach net-zero'". Carbon Brief. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)