Revision as of 01:27, 8 April 2007 editĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 04:03, 8 April 2007 edit undoOrderinchaos (talk | contribs)Administrators70,076 edits reverted to last version by MarcK (fail was by sock of blocked user)Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
⚫ |
{{FailedGA|2007-04-08}} |
|
|
{{WikiProjectBanners |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners |
|
|1={{pro-wrestling|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
|
|1={{pro-wrestling|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
Line 12: |
Line 11: |
|
|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes||]}} |
|
|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes||]}} |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
⚫ |
{{GAnominee|2007-03-26}} |
|
|
|
|
==Good Article review (fail)== |
|
|
First see ] as an example of a current Good Article. <br /> |
|
|
1. '''Well written'''. Comprehensible English expression. Too much red text. The narrative isn't cogent or compelling. I see a ''lawyers list'' of dates developing in the latter half of the 'career' section.<br /> |
|
|
2. '''Accurate and verifiable'''. Yes. There are 29 references, appropriate to the size of the article.<br /> |
|
|
3. '''Broad'''. No. No details of his personal life are given. Is he married? Does he have kids? What's known about the side of his life outside the ring?<br /> |
|
|
4. '''Neutral'''. Yes. But in lead refer to his famed opponents as 'famed opponents', 'fabled performer','famed performer', or 'leading contenders', not 'legends'.<br /> |
|
|
5. '''Stable'''. Yes. Not to be held against it that protection against vandals has been warranted.<br /> |
|
|
6. '''Images'''. One image not showing the face. At least have a face image in the lead before you go for Good Article. <br /> |
|
|
'''Recommendations''': Note and address the above. Join the article to a Wikiproject and seek rating assessment from a peer under it, or go for ''peer review''. Be imitating the structure, style and content of ] or at least ].<br /> In socialism, ] 01:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC) |
|