| Revision as of 18:06, 4 March 2024 editBri (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,013 edits →Are there plans for using "piccy" in archives of The Signpost?: 2024-02-13 for consistency with other← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:31, 10 March 2024 edit undoCactiStaccingCrane (talk | contribs)24,860 edits →Signpost has degraded in quality: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| :The landing page has been very broken since the introduction of the new format a few issues ago, and it has not been fixed or reverted. I am in awe of the improvements that have been made to the Signpost infrastructure over the last year or so, but this change is definitely still in early beta. I don't think I have the skills to fix it. – ] (]) 16:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | :The landing page has been very broken since the introduction of the new format a few issues ago, and it has not been fixed or reverted. I am in awe of the improvements that have been made to the Signpost infrastructure over the last year or so, but this change is definitely still in early beta. I don't think I have the skills to fix it. – ] (]) 16:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Not to mention that ] is a ''third'' presentation of the table of contents. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 18:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC) | :Not to mention that ] is a ''third'' presentation of the table of contents. ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 18:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Signpost has degraded in quality == | |||
| Have anyone here noticed that The Signpost's quality has downgraded since around last year? Articles on the Signpost now have clickbaity titles, AI-generated photos and no actual substance in its body, a far cry from its former glory. I would much rather have a monthly but quality Signpost rather than this steaming bi-weekly pile of sensationalist reporting. ] (]) 12:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:31, 10 March 2024
 | Please use this page for general or technical issues, praise, queries, or complaints related to The Signpost as a whole.
|
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talk pages of subpages of Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost except /Newsroom redirect here. |
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. | |
 (talk · chat) |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent changes: main · talk |
|
|
"Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archives/Years" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archives/Years has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archives/Years until a consensus is reached. jp×g🗯️ 05:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Front-page layout
In the current issue, it seems like each article's image is the same size but some articles' below-the-image text is one line whereas others are two. Because it appears to use automatic packing rather than fixed-height for the text or grid-layout for the entries, that means the items in adjacent columns lower down the page are misaligned with each other. DMacks (talk) 05:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. It's not great. jp×g🗯️ 06:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikiproject Report
Hello I am interested in reviving the Wikiproject Report. I am very active within wikiprojects and most of my edits can be traced to either wikiproject television or wikiproject Doctor Who. I feel that WikiProjects are key to wikipedias growth and deserve more recognition. What steps would be required in order for me to join the Signpost Team. Some of the projects I wish to cover include WP:COMICS, WP:Misplaced Pages, WP:DISNEY, and WP:AUSTRALIA. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Are there plans for using "piccy" in archives of The Signpost?
Page Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archives/2024-02-13 looks very different compared to how the 13 February 2024 issue looked like on the landing page. Are there any plans to integrate the |piccy-*= template parameters into the archives of The Signpost? —andrybak (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- The landing page has been very broken since the introduction of the new format a few issues ago, and it has not been fixed or reverted. I am in awe of the improvements that have been made to the Signpost infrastructure over the last year or so, but this change is definitely still in early beta. I don't think I have the skills to fix it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not to mention that Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-02-13 is a third presentation of the table of contents. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Signpost has degraded in quality
Have anyone here noticed that The Signpost's quality has downgraded since around last year? Articles on the Signpost now have clickbaity titles, AI-generated photos and no actual substance in its body, a far cry from its former glory. I would much rather have a monthly but quality Signpost rather than this steaming bi-weekly pile of sensationalist reporting. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)