| Revision as of 07:25, 26 March 2024 editRoyal88888 (talk | contribs)495 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 26 March 2024 edit undoJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' Another failed YouTube clone, and our standards have changed since 2009 so this doesn't pass N under current guidelines. <span style="font-family: Roboto;">''']''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(])''</small></span> 23:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Another failed YouTube clone, and our standards have changed since 2009 so this doesn't pass N under current guidelines. <span style="font-family: Roboto;">''']''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''(])''</small></span> 23:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ** Which aspect has changed since then that you see as as a relevant difference? ] (]) 15:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - There is not too much coverage to meet notability. It's defunct anyway, so no one is really going to be reading about it.] (]) 07:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - There is not too much coverage to meet notability. It's defunct anyway, so no one is really going to be reading about it.] (]) 07:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 26 March 2024
QubeTV
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- QubeTV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has been 6 years since a WP:GNG was raised. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- keep (Disclaimer: I'm the primary author of the article.) The situation is essentially the same as with the prior nomination. There are multiple reliable sources focusing on the website. That the website is now defunct doesn't alter the notability. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism and Websites. Spiderone 19:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Another failed YouTube clone, and our standards have changed since 2009 so this doesn't pass N under current guidelines. Nate • (chatter) 23:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Which aspect has changed since then that you see as as a relevant difference? JoshuaZ (talk) 15:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - There is not too much coverage to meet notability. It's defunct anyway, so no one is really going to be reading about it.Royal88888 (talk) 07:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)