| Revision as of 20:56, 2 January 2024 editMe, Myself, and I are Here (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users105,912 editsm →See also: alpha, tweak link← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:51, 26 March 2024 edit undoNicolausPrime (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,083 edits restore an older version of the "history" paragraphNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| == History == | == History == | ||
| {{Unreferenced section|date=August 2023}} | |||
| ] believed that there was a "true meaning" of a word, distinct from common use. There is evidence that a similar belief existed among ancient ] scholars. In modern days, this fallacy can be found in some arguments of ]s.<ref name="Sihler" /> | |||
| ] taught that a word's meaning could be tracked across time, creating a distinction between formal and informal language, with a similar practice existing among ancient ] scholars. In modern ], semiotics and semantics are intertwined, and reflective of a society's culture across time. The discipline operates on the principle that current meaning derives from previous meaning, which has embedded itself in the predicate of subsequent derivatives. Removing the etymological history thus removes necessary context on which present meaning ontologically depends. | |||
| ==Occurrence and examples== | ==Occurrence and examples== | ||
Revision as of 21:51, 26 March 2024
Fallacy that a word's history defines its meaningAn etymological fallacy is an argument of equivocation, arguing that a word is defined by its etymology, and that its customary usage is therefore incorrect.
History
Ancient Greeks believed that there was a "true meaning" of a word, distinct from common use. There is evidence that a similar belief existed among ancient Vedic scholars. In modern days, this fallacy can be found in some arguments of language purists.
Occurrence and examples
An etymological fallacy becomes possible when a word's meaning shifts over time from its original meaning. Such changes can include a narrowing or widening of scope or a change of connotation (amelioration or pejoration). In some cases, modern usage can shift to the point where the new meaning has no evident connection to its etymon.
An example of a word with a potentially misleading etymology is antisemitism. The structure of the word suggests that it is about opposition to and hatred of Semitic peoples, but the term was coined in the 19th century to specifically refer to anti-Jewish beliefs and practices, and explicitly defined Jewish people as a racial class. Modern anthropology and evolutionary biology overwhelmingly reject the concept of race, and the term Semite is rarely used anymore except in discussing Semitic languages. An etymological fallacy emerges when a speaker asserts that antisemitism is not restricted to hatred of Jews, but rather must include opposition to all other Semitic peoples. However, sources like Encyclopædia Britannica still consider it a misnomer.
See also
- Folk etymology – Process of reinterpretive word formation
- Genetic fallacy – Fallacy in which validity is determined by origin
- Informal fallacy – Form of incorrect argument in natural language
- Persuasive definition – Stipulative, biased definition of a term
References
- ^ Sihler, Andrew (2000). Language History. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory. Vol. 191. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. pp. 131–133. ISBN 90-272-3698-4.
- Wilson, Kenneth G. (1993). "Etymological Fallacy". The Columbia Guide to Standard American English.
- Templeton, A. (2016). EVOLUTION AND NOTIONS OF HUMAN RACE. In Losos J. & Lenski R. (Eds.), How Evolution Shapes Our Lives: Essays on Biology and Society (pp. 346–361). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv7h0s6j.26.
- Wagner, Jennifer K.; Yu, Joon-Ho; Ifekwunigwe, Jayne O.; Harrell, Tanya M.; Bamshad, Michael J.; Royal, Charmaine D. (February 2017). "Anthropologists' views on race, ancestry, and genetics". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 162 (2): 318–327. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23120. PMC 5299519. PMID 27874171.
- Lipstadt, Deborah (2019). Antisemitism: Here and Now. Schocken Books. ISBN 978-0-80524337-6.
- "Encyclopedia Britannica: Semitic people can't be called antisemitic". The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com. 2022-02-04. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
- "Origins and concept of anti-Semitism | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
Further reading
- Gula, Robert J. (2002). Nonsense: A Handbook of Logical Fallacies. Axios Press. pp. 48, 161. ISBN 0-9661908-5-8.
- Steinmetz, Sol (2008). Semantic Antics: How and Why Words Change Meanings. Random House Reference. ISBN 978-0-375-42612-4.
- Zenker, Frank (2002). The Etymological Argument - Fallacy or Sound Move. Munich. ISBN 978-3-638-14401-8. OCLC 904809359.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
| Common fallacies (list) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
