Misplaced Pages

Talk:A580 road: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:22, 28 February 2024 editBattyBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,934,080 editsm top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layoutTag: AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 00:30, 2 April 2024 edit undoBattyBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,934,080 edits top: General fixes per WP:Talk page layoutTag: AWBNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{WikiProject Merseyside|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Merseyside|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject UK Roads|importance=high|attention=yes}} {{WikiProject UK Roads|importance=high|attention=yes}}
{{WikiProject Greater Manchester|importance=low|attention=yes}} {{WikiProject Greater Manchester|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject UK geography|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject UK geography|importance=Mid}}
}} }}

Revision as of 00:30, 2 April 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMerseyside Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHighways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.
WikiProject iconGreater Manchester Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUK geography Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"was designed to eventually have triple highways"

What does this mean? A "three-lane-road", three carriageways, a three-lane dual carriageway like a motorway, what? Please explain better. 86.146.232.175 13:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I was going to post exactly the same thing! 161.12.7.4 (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

First dual carriageway?

I don't think this claim is accurate. The road opened in 1934 - there were already dual carriageways open by then - for example Blackburn had a section of its ring road with dual carriageways in 1928. The fact a citation is needed kind of emphasises the point that it's not a valid claim?

Bryn666 (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I've changed the {{fact}} to {{dubious}} (which links to this talk page) as the claim is probably not accurate. If construction started in 1929 then that short section of Blackburn ring road was almost certainly earlier, and maybe that was not the first either. --Snigbrook 02:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Well lets hope that this unnamed (unnumbered) road in Blackburn is referenced - possibly yet another dubious claim.Pyrotec (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I'd not read the dual carriageway article, thanks for that; however for a B class article it is badly referenced. The A580 text also contradicts the references quoted. Skimming through its references, the conversion to dual carriageway appears to date to the 1950s/60s. You and Bryn666 appear to both have a Blackburn affinity, so it looked a bit like the "Blackburn two" (sorry for that) versus the A580. I have no great interest in the A580, its just a road I used to get from Salford to the M6 in the early 1970s; 30 years late I used the M62/M60/M602.Pyrotec (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

First concrete road

AIUI (family lore, from a family that ran a haulage business along it since it was opened) this was the first major UK road to be surfaced with concrete, rather than tarmac. Anyone able to source this? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A580 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Categories: