Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cka3n: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:03, 4 February 2007 editScoutersig (talk | contribs)7,218 edits Kappa Alpha Disambiguation← Previous edit Revision as of 22:41, 10 April 2007 edit undoAthaenara (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,866 edits 3RRNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


Yes, you're right. I simply got "in the groove" in my disambiguations—looks like it was more "in a rut," though. Thanks for correcting my blunder(s). —]] 04:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Yes, you're right. I simply got "in the groove" in my disambiguations—looks like it was more "in a rut," though. Thanks for correcting my blunder(s). —]] 04:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Gene Nichols|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:41, 10 April 2007

Welcome!

Hello Cka3n, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Cheers, -- Infrogmation 16:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Cka3n 17:03, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

W&M

From a quick look at your edits, they look fine to me. You explained reasons for your reverts and tried to direct discussion over any points of controvercy to the talk page. Partisan bickering will arise from time to time, but you seem to have handled things well. Feel free to ask for help from others if there's a continuing significant problem. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

good eye!

*sigh*, another arm hair gone...found the same problem but in a different part of the regex. i just checked through the entire thing, if it happens again i'm going to revert back to an older regex - these are all relatively new complaints. thanks for looking out for my bot. JoeBot 16:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Chicken Wings disambiguation page

Hi Cka3n! I thought the Chicken Wings disambiguation page was removed and replaced by a redirection to Buffalo Wings because the link to the comic was an external link only. But now there is a Misplaced Pages Article on the comic and the link points there. I thought it would make sense to recreate a disambiguation page now.

I might want to add that there are similar disambituation pages, like for the comic Ctrl+Alt+Del for instance.

Hi-Fives for Moss!

As promised, here are seven hi-fives for answering my question about moss. A simple answer that makes sense. Hi-fives for Cka3n! -Taco325i 18:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Kappa Alpha Disambiguation

Yes, you're right. I simply got "in the groove" in my disambiguations—looks like it was more "in a rut," though. Thanks for correcting my blunder(s). —ScouterSig 04:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Gene Nichols. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)