Misplaced Pages

User talk:67.163.193.239: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:28, 11 April 2007 editMiranda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,620 editsm Reverted 2 edits by 67.163.193.239 identified as vandalism to last revision by IvoShandor. using TW← Previous edit Revision as of 07:29, 11 April 2007 edit undoIvoShandor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,973 edits re:why?Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


::And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over ], it may help you see what to shoot for. ] 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC) ::And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over ], it may help you see what to shoot for. ] 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Sheesh. Real nice, you removed my comment? Why? ] 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:29, 11 April 2007

/Archive 1

Rudeness

I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another.

  • 10 for: 3 were either the users sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 7
  • 7 against: 2 of which were either the user's sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 5

7 to 5 simply doesn't represent consensus. Sorry. 07:13, IvoShandor 07:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over WP:CONSENSUS, it may help you see what to shoot for. IvoShandor 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Sheesh. Real nice, you removed my comment? Why? IvoShandor 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)