| Revision as of 07:48, 11 April 2007 editIvoShandor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,973 edits re:huh← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:49, 11 April 2007 edit undoIvoShandor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,973 edits re:commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ==Huh?== | ==Huh?== | ||
| You can't demand that I don't post here, how else am I supposed to communicate with you. In addition, no admin blanked your page, you did. ] 07:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | You can't demand that I don't post here, how else am I supposed to communicate with you. In addition, no admin blanked your page, you did. ] 07:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::And I am not a troll, I am a dedicated and hard working Wikipedian. Please don't group me with slime like that, thanks. ] 07:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Rudeness== | ==Rudeness== | ||
| I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another. | I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another. | ||
Revision as of 07:49, 11 April 2007
Huh?
You can't demand that I don't post here, how else am I supposed to communicate with you. In addition, no admin blanked your page, you did. IvoShandor 07:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- And I am not a troll, I am a dedicated and hard working Wikipedian. Please don't group me with slime like that, thanks. IvoShandor 07:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Rudeness
I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another.
- 10 for: 3 were either the users sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 7
- 7 against: 2 of which were either the user's sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 5
7 to 5 simply doesn't represent consensus. Sorry. 07:13, IvoShandor 07:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over WP:CONSENSUS, it may help you see what to shoot for. IvoShandor 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Sheesh. Real nice, you removed my comment? Why? IvoShandor 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Hu12 07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Instead of choosing to respond, you blank the page? This doesn't make sense to me. Why not respond? I wasn't rude. I was merely pointing out that there is no consensus. It would seem you are not interested at all in discussion. IvoShandor 07:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.--Hu12 07:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)