Revision as of 19:51, 3 May 2024 editSimonm223 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,677 edits →‘International relations’ section contains some apparently misleading stuff: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:00, 5 May 2024 edit undoAingotno (talk | contribs)162 edits →‘International relations’ section contains some apparently misleading stuff: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:See also Kristin Ross’s discussion of the literature (David Harvey, Raya Dunayevskaya, Teodor Shanin) on how the Paris Commune and ], in different ways, challenged Marx to rethink his assessment of Russian agrarian communalism (ch. 3 of Ross's ''Communal Luxury''). ~ ] (]) 19:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | :See also Kristin Ross’s discussion of the literature (David Harvey, Raya Dunayevskaya, Teodor Shanin) on how the Paris Commune and ], in different ways, challenged Marx to rethink his assessment of Russian agrarian communalism (ch. 3 of Ross's ''Communal Luxury''). ~ ] (]) 19:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Ok so what revision do you propose? ] (]) 19:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ::Ok so what revision do you propose? ] (]) 19:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::It's easier to criticize than to implement an improvement, and I don't have much leisure now for the harder thing. But if one were to take Anderson as a way in, one could organize a revision around a distinction and a periodization. | |||
:::Distinction: Marx on 'peripheral' countries (e.g. India, Russia, Algeria, China), their relations to capitalism, and the significance of colonialism, ''and'' Marx on movements for emancipation based around ethnic/national identities (Jewish, Irish, Polish), on racism, and on the relationship between these things and working class organizing. | |||
:::Periodization: I haven't gotten deep into Anderson, but his general suggestion is that in the 1840s and 1850s Marx held to a unilinear conception of world history and the transition beyond capitalism: you could only get to communism via capitalism (here Anderson includes what he calls Marx's 'qualified support', at that time, for colonialism). The passage currently included from the Stanford Encyclopaedia is focused on the 1853 article on India, in which, according to Anderson, Marx is expressing this unilinear perspective -- it could be contextualized within the periodization to show this. | |||
:::More generally, the unilinear conception is (according to Anderson) also familiar to readers of the Communist Manifesto and most editions of vol. 1 of Capital ('The country that is more developed industrially only shows, to the less developed, the image of its own future.' -- 1867 preface). But Marx later shifted, Anderson says (and Ross, as I mentioned above, seems to concur), to a multiliniar conception of history and became much more open to the idea of transitions to communism that would not proceed via capitalism (Anderson argues that the French edition of Capital vol. 1, which was the last to be worked on by Marx himself, shows signs of this later perspective). | |||
:::I'd say the periodization is more important than the distinction (the two sides of the distinction are clearly closely related), and alerting readers to the existence of the periodized way of interpreting Marx on these topics would be a great start. | |||
:::I also wonder if the section title 'international relations' is itself misleading. It seems to imply that Marx was primarliy concerned with differences and conflicts ], whereas he was primarily concerned with conflicts between classes and was an exponent of working class ]. Hence Anderson describes himself as studying Marx's writings 'on nationalism, ethnicity, and non-Western societies', not 'Marx on international relations'. Anderson's phrase is probably not perfect, but maybe something like it could work as a section title. ~ ] (]) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:00, 5 May 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Karl Marx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 50 days |
This page is about Marx, not Marxism. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
Karl Marx has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
House in Trier, Germany, where Marx spent his childhood and youth
Heinrich Marx, the father of Karl Marx, bought the small mansard roof building in Trier´s Simeonstrasse in 1819 when Karl was only one year old. The later socialist grew up here with his parents and five siblings and moved out aged 17 after his graduation from secondary school (Gymnasium). Yet as a grown up man, he returned to Trier several times to visit his relatives. Compared to today, little has changed in the historical city center of Trier: The main characteristics of the old town around the market place have been preserved and looked more or less the same back in the days when Karl Marx lived there . In particular the neighbourhood of the house to the Trier's most famous landmark, the Roman city gate Porta Nigra, is still impressive. In most parts unchanged to this day, it is likely that Karl Marx took the very same route to school every day that tourists can walk today . The house in Simeonstraße had a lasting impact on Karl Marx, especially since he had been educated here in home schooling until the age of 12 . As an adult, Karl Marx returned to live with his family in this house during his visits several times. For example in 1841 after his doctoral studies in Berlin, Marx travelled back to Trier. The main reason for his return home was to be close to his long-term fiancée Jenny von Westphalen. Also in the following year, 1842, Karl Marx spent some months in the house in Simeonstraße 8 (then Simeongasse 1040) in order to take care of family matters .
Location of the house The former home of Karl Marx in Simeonstraße 8 (then Simeongasse 1040) looks rather unremarkable at the beginning of Trier's shopping promenade close to the famous Porta Nigra. Only a few minutes walk leads visitors to the bronze statue of Karl Marx by Wu Weishan – a present from the People's Republic of China to Trier.
References
- Longuet, Robert-Jean (1977). Karl Marx mein Urgroßvater. Berlin. p. 16.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Neffe, Jürgen (2017). Marx der Unvollendete. Bertelsmann. p. 41. ISBN ISBN-13 978-3570102732.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help) - Monz, Heinz (1964). Trier. p. 164.
{{cite book}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Baumeister, Jens (2017). Wie der Wein Karl Marx zum Kommunisten machte: Ein Kommunist als Streiter für die Moselwinzer. Trier. p. 32. ISBN ISBN 978-3000564710.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Longuet, Robert-Jean (1977). Karl Marx mein Urgroßvater. Berlin. p. 52.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Moses Mordecai Levi, otherwise known as Karl Heinrich Marx (May 5, 1818-March 14, 1883) was a German-Jewish philosopher, economist, historian, revolutionary, and journalist from Trier, Germany. Prism Steno Book (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.
— Urro ⋮ 13:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
In need of profound revision
No actionable edit request |
---|
This is not an encyclopaedic entry, but a hagiography. No other thinker in Misplaced Pages has received such an uncritical appearance, not even Aristotle or Plato. Criticism of Marx has been masked or removed, including the fact that most of Marx's theories have been conclusively refuted. I add an NPOV. 86.6.148.125 (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
Critiques of Marx as a person.
Little to nothing about the personal character or contradictions of Marx as a human being. Seems one sided. Not looking for character assassination but a more balanced view. Redonefifty (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
‘International relations’ section contains some apparently misleading stuff
The article cites Kevin Anderson's Marx at the Margins for the claim that ‘Marx viewed Russia as the main counter-revolutionary threat to European revolutions’. But while chapter two of Anderson's book does indeed contain a section titled ‘Russia as a counter revolutionary threat’, if you actually read the section, you find Anderson saying:
- By the 1870s, Marx had dispensed with the idea of Russia as a counter-revolutionary threat that can be found in his writings of the 1850s (when Marx focused ‘on the absence of a Russian revolutionary movement argued that the Russian village’s communal form undergirded a despotic social and political system.’ Anderson then gives a preview of a later chapter of his book: ‘Marx changed his position by the 1870s, when he began to see the Russian communal village as a possible center of revolution.’)
- While it is ‘true that Marx tended to portray Russia and its people in a one-dimensional, condescending manner in his mid-1850s writings,’ Marx ‘nowhere stooped to the type of ethnocentrism that one finds in these writings by Engels.’ By ‘these writings’, Andrson is referring to the text from the Neue Rheinische Zeitung (beginning ‘To the sentimental phrases about brotherhood...’) that the present article attributes to Marx and Engels writing together.
~ Aingotno (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- See also Kristin Ross’s discussion of the literature (David Harvey, Raya Dunayevskaya, Teodor Shanin) on how the Paris Commune and Vera Zasulich, in different ways, challenged Marx to rethink his assessment of Russian agrarian communalism (ch. 3 of Ross's Communal Luxury). ~ Aingotno (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok so what revision do you propose? Simonm223 (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's easier to criticize than to implement an improvement, and I don't have much leisure now for the harder thing. But if one were to take Anderson as a way in, one could organize a revision around a distinction and a periodization.
- Distinction: Marx on 'peripheral' countries (e.g. India, Russia, Algeria, China), their relations to capitalism, and the significance of colonialism, and Marx on movements for emancipation based around ethnic/national identities (Jewish, Irish, Polish), on racism, and on the relationship between these things and working class organizing.
- Periodization: I haven't gotten deep into Anderson, but his general suggestion is that in the 1840s and 1850s Marx held to a unilinear conception of world history and the transition beyond capitalism: you could only get to communism via capitalism (here Anderson includes what he calls Marx's 'qualified support', at that time, for colonialism). The passage currently included from the Stanford Encyclopaedia is focused on the 1853 article on India, in which, according to Anderson, Marx is expressing this unilinear perspective -- it could be contextualized within the periodization to show this.
- More generally, the unilinear conception is (according to Anderson) also familiar to readers of the Communist Manifesto and most editions of vol. 1 of Capital ('The country that is more developed industrially only shows, to the less developed, the image of its own future.' -- 1867 preface). But Marx later shifted, Anderson says (and Ross, as I mentioned above, seems to concur), to a multiliniar conception of history and became much more open to the idea of transitions to communism that would not proceed via capitalism (Anderson argues that the French edition of Capital vol. 1, which was the last to be worked on by Marx himself, shows signs of this later perspective).
- I'd say the periodization is more important than the distinction (the two sides of the distinction are clearly closely related), and alerting readers to the existence of the periodized way of interpreting Marx on these topics would be a great start.
- I also wonder if the section title 'international relations' is itself misleading. It seems to imply that Marx was primarliy concerned with differences and conflicts between sovereign states, whereas he was primarily concerned with conflicts between classes and was an exponent of working class internationalism. Hence Anderson describes himself as studying Marx's writings 'on nationalism, ethnicity, and non-Western societies', not 'Marx on international relations'. Anderson's phrase is probably not perfect, but maybe something like it could work as a section title. ~ Aingotno (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok so what revision do you propose? Simonm223 (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- History good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-3 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Top-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- GA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- GA-Class philosopher articles
- High-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- GA-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- GA-Class Continental philosophy articles
- High-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- GA-Class Modern philosophy articles
- High-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles
- GA-Class sociology articles
- Top-importance sociology articles
- GA-Class Germany articles
- Top-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- Top-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class Atheism articles
- High-importance Atheism articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- GA-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- GA-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- GA-Class Alternative views articles
- Top-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English