Revision as of 12:42, 26 April 2024 editChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,143 edits rm, this is basically nonsense, or to put it another way, vandalism: stop it at onceTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:32, 10 May 2024 edit undo82.20.46.48 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:::OK I have put a lot of detail in the main article and the answer seems to be between 4% and 12%. If anyone from the FAO is reading this where are your methodology and error bars please? ] (]) 12:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC) | :::OK I have put a lot of detail in the main article and the answer seems to be between 4% and 12%. If anyone from the FAO is reading this where are your methodology and error bars please? ] (]) 12:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::: I don't think you'll get an answer that way, and I do think your own methodology of calculation and inference is extremely close to the ] boundary. ] (]) 13:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) | :::: I don't think you'll get an answer that way, and I do think your own methodology of calculation and inference is extremely close to the ] boundary. ] (]) 13:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
According to All the Mammals of the world there are 4 species of cattle: Bos frontalis, Bos domesticus, Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Pls can you change it? |
Revision as of 15:32, 10 May 2024
Taurine cattle was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 March 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cattle. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cattle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cattle is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||
Cattle has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article |
Greenhouse gas percentage?
@Chiswckchap As Lula has been in power for a while now so there is less deforestation would it be OR to ignore land use change and simply tick the 4 Climate Trace boxes which mention “cattle”? Also we could link to their methodology, which they explain in detail. Then the lead could just say “more than 4%” which is not likely to change for years.
I mean although the FAO is presumably a more reliable source than Climate Trace a lot has changed since 2015, and I have not yet been able to find the FAO methodology. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- It sounds extremely risky to me, so please, let's not do it. Further, this article is currently going through a GAN review, so it's definitely not a great moment. A third thing: this is not the right article for intricate detail on environmental matters, as it's the top-level article on all things Cattle; we already have Environmental impact of cattle production for exactly that subject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ah thanks I did not notice that article - I will move some detail there and ask on that talk page Chidgk1 (talk) 13:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK I have put a lot of detail in the main article and the answer seems to be between 4% and 12%. If anyone from the FAO is reading this where are your methodology and error bars please? Chidgk1 (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you'll get an answer that way, and I do think your own methodology of calculation and inference is extremely close to the WP:OR boundary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- It sounds extremely risky to me, so please, let's not do it. Further, this article is currently going through a GAN review, so it's definitely not a great moment. A third thing: this is not the right article for intricate detail on environmental matters, as it's the top-level article on all things Cattle; we already have Environmental impact of cattle production for exactly that subject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
According to All the Mammals of the world there are 4 species of cattle: Bos frontalis, Bos domesticus, Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Pls can you change it?
Categories:- GA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-3 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class Agriculture articles
- Top-importance Agriculture articles
- GA-Class Livestock articles
- Top-importance Livestock articles
- Livestock task force articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- GA-Class mammal articles
- Top-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- GA-Class Climate change articles
- High-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Agriculture, food and drink good articles