| Revision as of 23:55, 12 April 2007 edit70.113.114.144 (talk) I didn't see the last sentence. Thanks for pointing out that it is not wht the source says. Rest is indicative.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:59, 12 April 2007 edit undo70.113.114.144 (talk) →CriticismNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
| The book stands exposed as an attempt to camouflage the roles of some of the more oppressive Muslim Emperors in India (such as ]) in an attempt to whitewash the role of Islamic Jihad against Hindus in India. | The book stands exposed as an attempt to camouflage the roles of some of the more oppressive Muslim Emperors in India (such as ]) in an attempt to whitewash the role of Islamic Jihad against Hindus in India. Gordon Johnson criticizes Sen's history when he writes: | ||
| <blockquote> | |||
| Sen's history is weak. He chooses his examples to suit his present purpose without apparent awareness of their historical context...Although nicely written, and with many points of interest, there is a thinness and superficiality about the whole that displeases..My greatest disappointment with this book is that its use of history is as unscrupulous and trivialising as that of those Sen wishes to bring down. The Argumentative Indian is not sufficiently thoughtful and serves as a forceful reminder that history is constantly being used in a dangerously naive way. | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| {{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 23:59, 12 April 2007
The Argumentative Indian (ISBN 0-7139-9687-0) is a book written by the Indian Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen. It is a collection of essays that discuss India's history and identity, focusing on the traditions of public debate and intellectual pluralism.
The Argumentative Indian brings together a selection of writings from Sen that outline the need to understand contemporary India in the light of its long argumentative tradition. The understanding and use of this argumentative tradition are critically important, Sen argues, for the success of India's democracy, the defence of its secular politics, the removal of inequalities related to class, caste, gender and community, and the pursuit of sub-continental peace.
Criticism
The book stands exposed as an attempt to camouflage the roles of some of the more oppressive Muslim Emperors in India (such as Aurangzeb) in an attempt to whitewash the role of Islamic Jihad against Hindus in India. Gordon Johnson criticizes Sen's history when he writes:
Sen's history is weak. He chooses his examples to suit his present purpose without apparent awareness of their historical context...Although nicely written, and with many points of interest, there is a thinness and superficiality about the whole that displeases..My greatest disappointment with this book is that its use of history is as unscrupulous and trivialising as that of those Sen wishes to bring down. The Argumentative Indian is not sufficiently thoughtful and serves as a forceful reminder that history is constantly being used in a dangerously naive way.
References
External links
- The Argumentative Indian by Amartya Sen, a review published in The Asian Review of Books.
- Beyond the call centre, a review published in The Guardian.
- In defence of reason, another review from The Guardian.
- Effort to right wrongs leaves past shackled, a critical review from The Times Higher Education Supplement.
 | This article about a non-fiction history book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |