| Revision as of 12:22, 9 April 2007 editSteel (talk | contribs)20,265 edits Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:22, 13 April 2007 edit undoDoczilla (talk | contribs)Administrators49,060 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| You've been blocked. The reason is given in the block summary. – ] 12:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | You've been blocked. The reason is given in the block summary. – ] 12:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Not that I ought to be stirring things up, but what happened that got you blocked? I never could figure it out. I still don't know what block summary Steel was talking about, and Steel wasn't exactly responsive to the suggestion he/she could have used a dang template to post the block notice appropriately. ] 06:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:22, 13 April 2007
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on October 26 2006 to Man Beast
User CovenantD
Greetings. This user is unfortunately a tad obsessive and has once again breached the 3R-rule. 4 reverts on the article Mjolnir within 24 hours. His rationale aside, he's still gone ahead and done it.
Regards
Asgardian 23:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The correct place to report violations of the 3RR is WP:AN3. Please post it there in the prescribed format. Stifle (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Also, if you're going to report 3RR violatons, you should practice what you preach.
- --GentlemanGhost 18:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. HalfShadow 22:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Asgardian, I have closed this case; there's no evidence that you've violated WP:SOCK. However, I urge you to make sure that you're logged in for all your edits, so other editors can be sure that it's you. Happy editing! --Akhilleus (talk) 03:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Galactus
Talk:Galactus#Knock_it_off Dlong 02:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Omnipotence
Given the discussions we've been involved with over the meaning and misuse of the term omnipotent, you might want to check this out: Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_omnipotent_fictional_characters Doczilla 09:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Your Last Statement
"Odd to be sure, given that your History indicates that you seem to spend all your time policing one entry (cosmic fetish?). Have you actually crafted any articles from scratch? Made significant contributions? If not, perhaps more discussion and less snarkiness may help. Study the changes.
Asgardian 02:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TheBalance"
- What's surely odd is your History indicates that you spend all of your time engaged in revert wars over 3 - 4 entries. (revert fetish?) Have I crafted articles from scratch? Yes, indeed. Perhaps you should accept the reality that you have not been granted authority over the entries you have contributed to (or trimmed excessively). Perhaps you should also attempt to recognize that your fellow editors do not revert your edits simply because they "do not understand the changes." TheBalance 22:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You've been blocked. The reason is given in the block summary. – Steel 12:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not that I ought to be stirring things up, but what happened that got you blocked? I never could figure it out. I still don't know what block summary Steel was talking about, and Steel wasn't exactly responsive to the suggestion he/she could have used a dang template to post the block notice appropriately. Doczilla 06:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)