| Revision as of 18:56, 3 May 2024 editNovem Linguae (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Interface administrators, Administrators51,169 edits →Slow it down: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:09, 22 May 2024 edit undo84.210.149.236 (talk) →Ghurids: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| ::::@] Of course, I understand your concern since I am just a new page patroller as well. From now on I’ll take it slower, thank you. ] (]) 16:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ::::@] Of course, I understand your concern since I am just a new page patroller as well. From now on I’ll take it slower, thank you. ] (]) 16:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Evaluating ] when an article doesn't qualify for ] is what can take a lot of time for many articles, especially borderline or poorly sourced ones, because it involves opening each citation and evaluating it until you find enough that pass GNG. And then if you don't find enough passing sources, doing a ] search and evaluating those sources too. So please be careful that you are including a GNG evaluation in your workflow, where appropriate. –] <small>(])</small> 18:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | :::::Evaluating ] when an article doesn't qualify for ] is what can take a lot of time for many articles, especially borderline or poorly sourced ones, because it involves opening each citation and evaluating it until you find enough that pass GNG. And then if you don't find enough passing sources, doing a ] search and evaluating those sources too. So please be careful that you are including a GNG evaluation in your workflow, where appropriate. –] <small>(])</small> 18:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Ghurids == | |||
| The article is slowly becmonig an iranian advertisement. First there was no mention of tajiks in the opening but instead " unknown origins" and now as you have seen, some sources is changed to " most " sources, despite the fact that nearly all -- 2023 and 2024 sources call them Afghans. You are active there it is your moral duty to take a stance! ] (]) 17:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:09, 22 May 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notice to all users on my talk page
Welcome to my talk page, feel free to discuss things with me here, ranging from disputes, or questions, etc. After the problem has been solved, your comment here will likely be removed and added to my archives section, or my sub-pages, depending on of course, what you came here for.
Your thoughts?
Hello @Noorullah21, I have seen that you have some experience related to Maratha-related topics and so wanted to ask your opinion regarding Talk:Maratha Empire#Requested move 17 April 2024. PadFoot2008 12:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PadFoot2008 Hi. I’ll check it out when I have time, thanks for letting me know about this discussion! Noorullah (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi Noorullah21, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Misplaced Pages:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Misplaced Pages talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Misplaced Pages:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Slow it down
Hey @Noorullah21. I'd like to ask you to slow it down a bit with your new page reviewing. We typically wouldn't expect several quality reviews in a single minute from a new new page reviewer, it signals that due diligence is likely not being performed. Pinging @Nove Prime Novem Linguae, as I know this is something they sometimes monitor. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Accidently pinged the wrong person... fixing by pinging @Novem Linguae. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hey man im josh Sure.
- The method I usually do is I go onto the NPP and open a ton of tabs of new pages of topics I think would be relatively easy or things I’d like to patrol (i.e Military history, Football related, etc). Then begin patrolling in relatively quick succession — But if you think this might signify that it could not be patrolled properly quality-wise, I’ll slow it down. Noorullah (talk) 16:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do the same as well actually. But it's concerning from our point of view that you might not have exercised proper care (I haven't done a deep dive myself yet, just noticed you had reviewed over 200 articles in the last day). So, please just make sure there's no appropriate tags to add, take your time, and make sure we're getting it right :) Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hey man im josh Of course, I understand your concern since I am just a new page patroller as well. From now on I’ll take it slower, thank you. Noorullah (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Evaluating WP:GNG when an article doesn't qualify for WP:SNG is what can take a lot of time for many articles, especially borderline or poorly sourced ones, because it involves opening each citation and evaluating it until you find enough that pass GNG. And then if you don't find enough passing sources, doing a WP:BEFORE search and evaluating those sources too. So please be careful that you are including a GNG evaluation in your workflow, where appropriate. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Hey man im josh Of course, I understand your concern since I am just a new page patroller as well. From now on I’ll take it slower, thank you. Noorullah (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do the same as well actually. But it's concerning from our point of view that you might not have exercised proper care (I haven't done a deep dive myself yet, just noticed you had reviewed over 200 articles in the last day). So, please just make sure there's no appropriate tags to add, take your time, and make sure we're getting it right :) Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Ghurids
The article is slowly becmonig an iranian advertisement. First there was no mention of tajiks in the opening but instead " unknown origins" and now as you have seen, some sources is changed to " most " sources, despite the fact that nearly all -- 2023 and 2024 sources call them Afghans. You are active there it is your moral duty to take a stance! 84.210.149.236 (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)