Misplaced Pages

Talk:Vandalism of Stonehenge: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:54, 20 June 2024 editAd Orientem (talk | contribs)Administrators76,351 edits →Notability?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 04:17, 20 June 2024 edit undoWeatherWriter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers30,748 edits →Notability?: replyNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


Seems doubtful per ]. Does this pass the ]? -] (]) 03:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Seems doubtful per ]. Does this pass the ]? -] (]) 03:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
:It seems to pass NEVENT and given it occurred less than 24-hours ago, the 10-year test can’t be proven nor really thought of. I would say reassess in a week. As a note, the vandalism is still getting a ton of media attention, with all published within the last hour (of this message). So check-back in a week. I am going to remove the notability tag for now, given the large-scale media coverage, every part of NEVENT is proven and obvious passes. Only LASTING isn’t clear, due to how recent it is. '''The ]''' (] 04:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:17, 20 June 2024

This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHistoric sites Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEngland
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related

Notability?

Seems doubtful per WP:NEVENT. Does this pass the WP:10YT? -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

It seems to pass NEVENT and given it occurred less than 24-hours ago, the 10-year test can’t be proven nor really thought of. I would say reassess in a week. As a note, the vandalism is still getting a ton of media attention, with all published within the last hour (of this message). So check-back in a week. I am going to remove the notability tag for now, given the large-scale media coverage, every part of NEVENT is proven and obvious passes. Only LASTING isn’t clear, due to how recent it is. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories: