Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Vandalism of Stonehenge: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:00, 20 June 2024 editSecretlondon (talk | contribs)Administrators42,216 edits Vandalism of Stonehenge: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 12:10, 20 June 2024 edit undoWeatherWriter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers30,748 edits CommentNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
*'''Comment''' the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover ''all'' vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise '''Merge''' as above—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">]]<sup>]</sup></span> 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC) *'''Comment''' the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover ''all'' vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise '''Merge''' as above—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">]]<sup>]</sup></span> 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. ] (]) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) *'''Delete''' just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. ] (]) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment from creator''' — I absolutely did '''not''' say the scope couldn’t be expanded. In fact, my regarding notability of the article was to note that LASTING could not be proven, and that a reassessment should occur in a week for notability. I am not going to !vote here, however, {{u|GenevieveDEon}} put words into my mouth in this ] deletion attempt. I personally ignore the nomination reasoning by GenevieveDEon For that reason, however, all other comments (keep, merge, or delete) from other editors I will be looking at extensively and appreciate all the responses. '''The ]''' (] 12:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:10, 20 June 2024

Vandalism of Stonehenge

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Vandalism of Stonehenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This event is fully covered in a short paragraph in the main Stonehenge article. The idea that something which happened yesterday and was cleaned up today with no lasting effects needs a whole article with the sweeping title 'Vandalism of Stonehenge' is unreasonable. Attempts to query the notability of this article, or to expand its scope to match the title, have been rebuffed by the creator, which rather smacks of WP:OWN. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Categories: