Misplaced Pages

Utik: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:55, 8 July 2024 editRevolution Saga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,520 edits Removing incorrect reference to HewsenTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Revision as of 10:02, 11 July 2024 edit undoRevolution Saga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,520 edits History: rewriting with additional sourcesTags: nowiki added Visual editNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
| common_name = Utik | common_name = Utik
| image_map = Utik within Armenian Kingdom.png | image_map = Utik within Armenian Kingdom.png
| era = ] | era = ]<br>]
| subdivision = Province | subdivision = Province
| nation = ] | nation = ]
Line 15: Line 15:
| today = {{flag|Azerbaijan}}<br>{{flag|Armenia}} | today = {{flag|Azerbaijan}}<br>{{flag|Armenia}}
}} }}
] ]
'''Utik''' ({{lang-hy|Ուտիք}}, also known as '''Uti''', '''Utiq''', or '''Outi''') was a historic province of the ]. It was ceded to ] following the partition of Armenia between ] and the ] in 387 AD.<ref name=":0">{{cite web | title = Albania | last = Chaumont | first = M. L. | url = https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/albania-iranian-aran-arm |website=Encyclopædia Iranica, Online Edition|publisher=Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation|date=1985|quote = The more or less self-interested loyalty of the Albanians explains why the Sasanians helped them to seize from the Armenians the provinces (or districts) of Uti (with the towns of Xałxał and Pʿartaw), Šakašēn, Kołṭʿ, Gardman, and Arcʿax. (...) These territories were to remain in the possession of Albania; a reconquest by Mušeł (cf. Pʿawstos, ibid.) was unlikely.}}</ref> Most of the region is located within present-day ] immediately west of the ], while a part of it lies within the ] province of present-day northeastern ]. '''Utik''' ({{lang-hy|Ուտիք|translit=Utik’}}) was a historical province and principality within the ]. It was ceded to ] following the partition of Armenia between ] and the ] in 387 AD.<ref name=":0">{{cite web | title = Albania | last = Chaumont | first = M. L. | url = https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/albania-iranian-aran-arm |website=Encyclopædia Iranica, Online Edition|publisher=Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation|date=1985|quote = The more or less self-interested loyalty of the Albanians explains why the Sasanians helped them to seize from the Armenians the provinces (or districts) of Uti (with the towns of Xałxał and Pʿartaw), Šakašēn, Kołṭʿ, Gardman, and Arcʿax. (...) These territories were to remain in the possession of Albania; a reconquest by Mušeł (cf. Pʿawstos, ibid.) was unlikely.}}</ref> Most of the region is located within present-day ] immediately west of the ], while a part of it lies within the ] province of present-day northeastern ].


==History== == Name ==
In Armenian sources, Utik is also called {{lang|xcl-Latn|Uti}},{{efn|Without the suffix {{lang|xcl|-k’}}, which forms the nominative plural and the names of countries}} {{lang|xcl-Latn|Awti}}, {{lang|xcl-Latn|Utiats’wots’ ashkharh}} 'land of the people of Utik', {{lang|xcl-Latn|Utiats’wots’ gavar’}} 'district of the people of Utik', {{lang|xcl-Latn|Utiakan ashkharh}} and {{lang|xcl-Latn|Utiakan gavar’}} 'Utian land/district'.<ref name="ASE">{{Cite book |last=Harutiunian |first=B. |title=Haykakan sovetakan hanragitaran |publisher=] |volume=12|year=1986 |editor-last=Arzumanian |editor-first=Makich |location=Erevan |pages=–269 |language=hy |trans-title=Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia |chapter=Utikʻ|display-editors=etal|title-link=Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia}}</ref> It is identified with the place names {{Lang|grc-Latn|Otene}} in ] '']'', {{Lang|la|Otenon}} in the Latin '']'', and ''Ūdh'' in the Arabic history '']'' by ].<ref name=":1" /> It may also be identifiable with the land called ''Outia'' by ].<ref name=":2">{{cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |title=Armenia: A Historical Atlas |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2001 |isbn=0-226-33228-4 |author-link=Robert H. Hewsen|page=58}}</ref> According to ], the name of Utik is likely connected with the ethnonyms {{lang|grc-Latn|Outioi}}, mentioned by ] and ], and {{lang|la|Udini}}, mentioned by ].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |author-link=Robert H. Hewsen |url=https://archive.org/details/TheGeographyOfAnaniasOfSirak |title=The Geography of Ananias of Širak (Ašxarhac῾oyc῾): The Long and the Short Recensions |publisher=Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag |year=1992 |isbn=3-88226-485-3 |location=Wiesbaden |pages=260}}</ref> However, Pliny also mentions a group called the {{lang|la|Uti}}, which suggests that this is a separate group from the {{lang|la|Udini}}. Wolfgang Schulze writes that {{Lang|grc-Latn|Otene}} and ''Uti(k)'' are not necessarily related and may refer to two distinct regions. ''Udi-''/''uti-'' may be an old toponym referring to the lowlands between the ], the ], and the mountains of ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Schulze |first=Wolfgang |title=Völker und Phantome: Sprach- und kulturwissenschaftliche Studien zur Ethnizität |publisher=] |year=2018 |editor-last=Mumm |editor-first=Peter-Arnold |edition=1st |location=Berlin |pages=289 |chapter=Caucasian Albanian and the Question of Language and Ethnicity |chapter-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkk3np.11}}</ref> The place name is related to the name of the ], who live in the South Caucasus today.<ref name=":1" />
According to ], in the 2nd century BC, Armenians conquered from the ] the lands of ] and ], and the lands that lay between them, including Utik,<ref name="Hewsen">{{Cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |url=https://archive.org/details/classicalarmenia0000drhm |title=Classical Armenian Culture: Influences and Creativity |publisher=Scholars Press |year=1982 |isbn=0-89130-565-3 |editor-last=Samuelian |editor-first=Thomas J. |location=Chico, CA |pages=27–40 |chapter=Ethno-History and the Armenian Influence upon the Caucasian Albanians|author-link=Robert H. Hewsen}}</ref> that was populated by the people called Utis, after whom it received its name. Modern historians agree that "Utis" were a people of non-Armenian origin, and the modern ethnic group of ] is their descendants.<ref>{{cite book |last=Shnirelman |first=Viktor A. |author-link=Victor Schnirelmann |title=Voĭny pamiati: mify, identichnostʹ i politika v Zakavkazʹe |publisher=Academkniga |year=2003 |ISBN=5-94628-118-6 |location=Moscow |pages=226-228 |language=ru |trans-title=''Memory wars: myths, identity and politics in Transcaucasia''}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceC">{{cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |title=Medieval Armenian Culture |publisher=Scholars Press |year=1984 |editor1=Samuelian, Thomas J. |editor-link=Thomas J. Samuelian |series=University of Pennsylvania Armenian Texts and Studies |location=Chico, California |pages=42–68 |contribution=The Kingdom of Arc'ax |editor2=Stone, Michael E. |editor2-link=Michael E. Stone}}</ref> According to classical sources, Armenians settled as far as the ] in about the 7th century BC.<ref>{{cite web |title=Armenia and Iran i. Armina, Achaemenid province |website=Encyclopædia Iranica, Online Edition|publisher=Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation |url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/armenia-i |last=Schmitt |first=R. |date=December 15, 1986 |quote=Bordering on Media, Cappadocia, and Assyria, the Armenians settled, according to classical sources (beginning with Herodotus and Xenophon), in the east Anatolian mountains along the Araxes (Aras) river and around Mt. Ararat, Lake Van, Lake Rezaiyeh, and the upper courses of the Euphrates and Tigris; they extended as far north as the Cyrus (Kur) river. To that region they seem to have immigrated only about the 7th century B.C. |authorlink=}}</ref> After the conquest of Armenia in the 4th<ref>{{cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |title=Armenia: A Historical Atlas |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2001 |isbn=0-226-33228-4 |author-link=Robert H. Hewsen|page=32|quote=Strabo's description of the expansion of Zariadris and Artaxias makes it clear just what lands the Orontids had originally controlled: apparently much of Greater Armenia from the Euphrates to the basin of Lake Sevan and possibly beyond to the juncture of the Kur and Arax Rivers (as Harut'yunyan believes and as depicted here).}}</ref> or 2nd century BC Utik still had also Armenian population.<ref>Chahin, Mark. ''The Kingdom of Armenia: A History''. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2001, p. 181 {{ISBN|0-7007-1452-9}}.</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">Movses Khorenatsi, "History of Armenia," I.13, II.8</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">Movses Kaghankatvatsi, "History of Aghvank," I.4</ref><ref name="Schulze">{{Cite web |url=http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~wschulze/Cauc_alb.htm |title=Wolfgang Schulze. The Language of the 'Caucasian Albanian' (Aluan) Palimpses |access-date=2001-10-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011030235348/http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~wschulze/Cauc_alb.htm |archive-date=2001-10-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="Kuznetsov"></ref> The province was called ''Otena'' in Latin sources and ''Otene'' in Greek sources.<ref>Ptolemy, Geography: Book V, Chapter 13.9</ref>


== Geography ==
According to the Armenian geographer ]'s '']'' (Geography, 7th century), Utik was the twelfth of the fifth provinces of the Kingdom of Armenia, and belonged, at the time, to the Caucasian Albania (the provinces of Utik and ] provinces had been lost by Armenia after its partition in the 4th century).<ref name="Shirakatsi">]. </ref> According to ''Ashkharatsuyts,'' Utik consisted of 8 cantons (''gavars'' in Armenian): Aranrot, Tri, Rotparsyan, Aghve, Tuskstak (Tavush), ], Shakashen, and Uti. The province was bounded by the Kura River from north-east, river ] from south-east, and by the province of ] from the west.<ref>Anania Shirakatsi, "Geography"</ref> According to the Armenian geography '']'' (7th century, attributed to ]), Utik was the twelfth of the fifteen provinces of the ], and belonged, at the time, to ] (the provinces of Utik and ] had been lost by Armenia after its partition in the 4th century). According to ''Ashkharatsuyts,'' Utik consisted of eight districts (''{{lang|xcl-Latn|gavar’}}''s in Armenian): Aranrot, Tri, Rotparsyan, Aghve, Tuskstak (Tavush), ], Shakashen, and Uti Arandznak ('Uti Proper'). The province was bounded by the Kura River from north-east, the river ] from south-east, and by the province of ] from the west.<ref>Anania Shirakatsi, "Geography"</ref> According to Hewsen, in the ''Ashkharhatsuyts'', in contrast with other old Armenian sources, the principality of Utik is combined with the separate principalities of ] and ] (consisting of the districts of Shakashen and Tuskstak).<ref>Hewsen 2001, p. 102.</ref> Additionally, the districts of Tri and Rotestak/Rotparsyan may have formed a separate principality of the Gargarians during the Arsacid period.<ref name=":2" />


Utik was the site of the settlement of Khaghkhagh, which ] calls the "winter quarters of the Armenian kings" but which ] and ] call the quarters of the Albanian kings.<ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Garsoïan |first=Nina G. |author-link=Nina Garsoïan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZSnXAAAAMAAJ |title=The Epic Histories Attributed to Pʻawstos Buzand (Buzandaran Patmutʻiwnkʻ) |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=1989 |isbn=0-674-25865-7 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |pages=498}}</ref> Its location is uncertain.{{Efn|Hariutiunian considers the juncture of the Kura and its tributary the Zayamchay (Zakam) to be a likely location.<ref name="ASE">{{Cite book |last=Harutiunian |first=B. |title=Haykakan sovetakan hanragitaran |publisher=] |volume=4|year=1978 |editor-last=Simonian |editor-first=Abel |location=Erevan |pages=–716 |language=hy |trans-title=Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia |chapter=Utikʻ|display-editors=etal|title-link=Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia}}</ref> Other proposed locations are the confluence of the Kura and the ] or further up the Aghstafa.<ref>Hewsen 2001, map 52.</ref>}} ] places the city of Ainiana, mentioned by Strabo as being located in Outia, with modern ], but, in Hewsen's view, this is also uncertain. Utik was the site of a settlement called Tigranakert, built by ] in the 2nd–1st century BC. It may have been located in Gardman in the valley of the ].<ref name=":2" />
Greco-Roman historians from the 2nd century BC to the 4th century AD state that Utik was a province of Armenia, with the Kura River separating Armenia and Albania.<ref>Strabo, Geography, 11.14.4, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0198&loc=11.14.1</ref><ref>Pliny the Elder, "The Natural history ", 6.39: "..the tribe of Albanians settled on the Caucasian mountains, reaches ... the river Kir making border of Armenia and Iberia"</ref><ref>Claudius Ptolemy, "Geography" 5.12: "Armenia is located from the north to a part of Colchida, Iberia and Albania along the line, which goes through the river Kir (Kura)"</ref> But the Armenian-Albanian boundary along the Kura River, confirmed by Greco-Roman sources, was often overrun by armies of both countries.<ref name=":0" />


==History==
According to Strabo, Armenia, which in the 6th century BC had covered a large portion of Asia,<ref>Strabo, Geography, 11.13.5: "In ancient times Greater Armenia ruled the whole of Asia, after it broke up the empire of the Syrians", http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0198&loc=11.13.1</ref> had lost some of its lands by the 2nd century BC.<ref name="perseus.tufts.edu">Strabo, Geography, 11.14.5, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0198&loc=11.14.1</ref> At the same time Strabo wrote: "According to report, Armenia, though a small country in earlier times, was enlarged by Artaxias and Zariadris". Around 190 BC, under the king ] I, Armenia conquered ] and ] from ], ] from Cataonia, and ] from Syria{{citation needed|date=July 2021}}. Some have suggested that Utik was among the provinces conquered by Artashes I at this time,<ref name="Kuznetsov"/> though Strabo doesn't list Utik among Artashes' conquests.<ref name="perseus.tufts.edu"/>
The territory of Utik was controlled by the ]. Herodotus reports that the Outians were located in the fourteenth satrapy of that empire and that they formed part of the Persian army together with the Mykoi at ].<ref name=":1" /> The Outians and the Mykoi, identified with the Yutiya and Maka of Achaemenid inscriptions, may have been migrants from southeastern Iran,<ref name="Hewsen">{{Cite book |last=Hewsen |first=Robert H. |author-link=Robert H. Hewsen |url=https://archive.org/details/classicalarmenia0000drhm |title=Classical Armenian Culture: Influences and Creativity |publisher=Scholars Press |year=1982 |isbn=0-89130-565-3 |editor-last=Samuelian |editor-first=Thomas J. |location=Chico, CA |pages=33 |chapter=Ethno-History and the Armenian Influence upon the Caucasian Albanians}}</ref> although, according to another view, these groups were only ever located in southeastern Iran.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Akopian |first=Aleksan |title=Albaniia-Aluank v greko-latinskikh i drevnearmianskikh istochnikakh |publisher=Gitutyun |year=2022 |isbn=978-5-8080-1485-5 |edition=2nd, rev. |location=Yerevan |pages=67-68 |language=ru}}</ref> According to Hewsen, Utik seems to have been part of the satrapy of ] and the succeeding kingdom of ] until the 2nd century BC,<ref name=":1" /> when, according to Strabo, ] of Greater Armenia conquered the lands of Syunik{{Efn|Strabo refers to {{lang|grc-Latn|Phauene}}, which some scholars read as *{{lang|grc-Latn|Sauene}} and identify with Syunik.}} and ] and the lands that lay between them, i.e., Utik and ].<ref name=":3">Hewsen 1982, p. 32.</ref> Some Armenian scholars like Babken Harutiunian<ref name=":2" /><ref name="ASE" /> and Asatur Mnatsakanian<ref name=":3" /> believe that Syunik and Utik were already controlled by Armenia under the ] and were reconquered by Artaxias I, but Hewsen writes that there is no evidence to support this claim.<ref name=":2" />{{Efn|Elsewhere in the same work, however, Hewsen writes that it is possible that Orontid domains extended to the confluence of the Kura and the Arax.<ref>Hewsen 2001, p. 32.</ref>}}


Utik remained a part of Armenia for some 500 years after Artaxias's conquest,<ref name=":1" /> although the Armenian-Albanian boundary along the Kura River was often overrun by armies of both countries.<ref name=":0" /> It was lost as a result of the ], but, according to the author of ], in 370 AD the Armenian ''sparapet'' ] defeated the Albanians and restored the frontier back to the river Kura.<ref name=":4" /> In 387 AD,<ref name=":4" /> the ] helped the Albanians to seize from the Kingdom of Armenia a number of provinces, including Utik.<ref name=":0" /> Although there is some evidence that suggests that Utik remained a part of the Persian-controlled kingdom of Armenia even after 387, it was definitely incorporated into Albania after the abolition of the Armenian kingdom in 428.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dum-Tragut |first=Jasmine |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110794687/html |title=Caucasian Albania: An International Handbook |last2=Gippert |first2=Jost |author-link2=Jost Gippert |date=2023 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-11-079459-5 |editor-last=Gippert |editor-first=Jost |location=Berlin |pages=48 |chapter=Caucasian Albania in Medieval Armenian Sources (5th–13th Centuries) |doi=10.1515/9783110794687-002 |editor-last2=Dum-Tragut |editor-first2=Jasmine |chapter-url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110794687-002/html}}</ref>
King ] of Caucasian Albania invaded Utik. But in 370 AD, the Armenian ''sparapet'' Mushegh Mamikonyan defeated the Albanians, restoring the frontier back to the river Kura.<ref>], "History of Armenia," 5.13, 4th century AD.</ref> In 387 AD, the ] helped the Albanians to seize from the ] a number of provinces, including Utik.<ref name=":0" />


In the middle of the 5th century, by the order of the Persian king ], the king ] of Caucasian Albania built in Utik the city initially called Perozapat, and later Partaw and ], and made it the capital of Caucasian Albania. (Partaw may have existed previously as a town or a village by that name.)<ref>Hewsen 1992, p. 263.</ref> According to another view, Peroz I constructed the city himself after deposing the ruling family of Albania.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Gadjiev |first=Murtazali |author-link= |year=2017 |title=Construction Activities of Kavād I in Caucasian Albania |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/ic/21/2/article-p121_2.xml |journal=Iran and the Caucasus |publisher=Brill |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=122-123 |doi=10.1163/1573384X-20170202}}</ref> The princes of Utik, who formed part of the Armenian nobility, remained as rulers the province under Albanian and, later, Arab rule. After the fall of the Albanian kingdom in the early 6th century, it was not the princes of Utik, however, but those of Gardman who became the dominant princes of Albania. They were recognized as Presiding Princes of Albania by the Byzantine emperor Heraclius in 628 and remained in this position until 822. In 922, Utik was annexed by the ], but this included only part of the province's historical territory. According to ], the descendants of the princes of Utik were present in southern Artsakh as late as the 11th century.<ref name=":1" /> Later, Artsakh and Utik were known as ],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Mutafian |first=Claude |author-link=Claude Mutafian |title=Monuments and Identities in the Caucasus: Karabagh, Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan in Contemporary Geopolitical Conflict |date=2024 |publisher=] |isbn=978-90-04-67738-8 |editor-last=Dorfmann-Lazarev |editor-first=Igor |location=Leiden |pages=15-16 |chapter=Survey of Historical Geography of the South Caucasus from the Middle Ages to the Present Day |editor-last2=Khatchadourian |editor-first2=Haroutioun}}</ref> with the territory of Utik forming the lowland or steppe part of Karabakh.<ref>Hewsen 1992, p. 195.</ref>
In the middle of the 5th century, by the order of the Persian king ], the king Vache of Caucasian Albania built in Utik the city initially called Perozapat, and later Partaw and ], and made it the capital of Caucasian Albania.<ref>V. Minorsky, A History of Sharvan and Darband in the 10th-11th centuries, Cambridge (Heffer and Sons), 1958</ref><ref></ref>

Starting with the 13th century, the area covered by Utik and ] was called ] by non-Armenians.{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}


==Population== ==Population==
In ancient times, the area was inhabited by Armenians and "Utis" (likely the ancestors of modern-day ]), after whom it was named.<ref name="Kuznetsov"/>{{verification needed|date=July 2021}}<ref></ref> The early Armenian historian ] wrote that the local princes of Utik descended from the Armenian noble family of ] and spoke Armenian.<ref>Movses Khorenatsi, "History of Armenia," II.13, II.8</ref> In ancient times, the area was inhabited by Armenians and "Utis" (likely the ancestors of modern-day ]).<ref name="Kuznetsov"></ref>{{verification needed|date=July 2021}}<ref></ref> The early Armenian historian ] writes that the princes of Utik descended from ], a descendant of the legendary Armenian progenitor ] and the reputed ancestor of the ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Moses Khorenatsʻi |author-link=Movses Khorenatsi |title=History of the Armenians |date=2006 |publisher=Caravan Books |others=Translation and commentary by ] |isbn=978-0-88206-111-5 |edition=Rev. |location=Ann Arbor |page=137 (Book II, Chapter 8) |pages=}}</ref> Mnatsakanian has cited this as Hewsen writes that "t seems likely that except for Siwnik', eastern Armenia was not much more than armenized" and that the Utians were "almost certainly a Caucasian tribe."<ref name=":2" /> Historian Tim Greenwood writes that by the time of the composition of the ''Ashkharhatsuyts'', Utik, along with the provinces of Artsakh and Gugark, were no longer administratively part of Armenian but "they were evidently remembered as once having been Armenian and may have still contained communities who thought of themselves and the settlements they occupied as Armenian."<ref>{{cite book |last=Greenwood |first=Tim |title=Historiography and Space in Late Antiquity |date=29 August 2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-68668-6 |editor-last=Van Nuffelen |editor-first=Peter |pages=84 |chapter=Armenian Space in Late Antiquity |doi=10.1017/9781108686686.004}}</ref>


Utik had been one of the provinces of ], the population of which is referred to by the name Udini (or Utidorsi) in Latin sources, and by the name Outioi in Greek sources.<ref name="Schulze"/> However, Ancient Greco-Roman writers placed the Udis beyond Utik, north of the Kura River.<ref name="Kuznetsov"/> Utik had been one of the provinces of ], the population of which is referred to by the name Udini (or Utidorsi) in Latin sources, and by the name Outioi in Greek sources.<ref name="Schulze">{{Cite web |title=Wolfgang Schulze. The Language of the 'Caucasian Albanian' (Aluan) Palimpses |url=http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~wschulze/Cauc_alb.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011030235348/http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~wschulze/Cauc_alb.htm |archive-date=2001-10-30 |access-date=2001-10-30}}</ref> However, Ancient Greco-Roman writers placed the Udis beyond Utik, north of the Kura River.<ref name="Kuznetsov"/>


] names both the Uti and the Udini among the tribes living in eastern Transcaucasia and calls the latter a ] tribe ("Scytharum populus").<ref>{{Cite book|author=Pliny|title=Natural History, Book VI, Chapter 15}}</ref> This suggests the possibility that some Iranian-speaking or, less likely, ] may have settled in the area and adopted the language of the local Caucasian population).<ref name="Kuznetsov"/> More likely, however, the terms refer not to any specific ethnic group in the modern sense but simply the inhabitants of the eponymous region.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schulze|first=Wolfgang|date=May 2017|title=Caucasian Albanian and the Question of Language and Ethnicity|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317232007|journal=Language and Ethnic Identity|via=ResearchGate}}</ref> ] names both the Uti and the Udini among the tribes living in eastern Transcaucasia and calls the latter a ] tribe ("Scytharum populus").<ref>{{Cite book|author=Pliny|title=Natural History, Book VI, Chapter 15}}</ref> This suggests the possibility that some Iranian-speaking or, less likely, ] may have settled in the area and adopted the language of the local Caucasian population).<ref name="Kuznetsov"/> More likely, however, the terms refer not to any specific ethnic group in the modern sense but simply the inhabitants of the eponymous region.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schulze|first=Wolfgang|date=May 2017|title=Caucasian Albanian and the Question of Language and Ethnicity|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317232007|journal=Language and Ethnic Identity|via=ResearchGate}}</ref>
Line 42: Line 42:
==See also== ==See also==
*] *]

==Notes==
{{Notelist}}


==References== ==References==
Line 49: Line 52:
{{Historical regions of Caucasian Albania}} {{Historical regions of Caucasian Albania}}


]
]
{{coord missing|Armenia}} {{coord missing|Armenia}}
{{coord missing|Azerbaijan}} {{coord missing|Azerbaijan}}

]
]

Revision as of 10:02, 11 July 2024

Historical province of Greater Armenia For the village in Slovenia, see Utik, Vodice.
Utik
Province of Kingdom of Armenia
189 BC–387 AD

Historical eraAntiquity
Middle Ages
• Artaxias I declaring himself independent 189 BC
• Given to Caucasian Albania by Sassanids 387 AD
Today part of Azerbaijan
 Armenia
Utik within the Kingdom of Armenia in 150 AD. The Ashkharatsuyts's inclusion of Gardman and Shakashen (in the northwestern part of the province) within Utik, which may be anachronistic for the 2nd century, is reflected here.

Utik (Template:Lang-hy) was a historical province and principality within the Kingdom of Armenia. It was ceded to Caucasian Albania following the partition of Armenia between Sassanid Persia and the Eastern Roman Empire in 387 AD. Most of the region is located within present-day Azerbaijan immediately west of the Kura River, while a part of it lies within the Tavush province of present-day northeastern Armenia.

Name

In Armenian sources, Utik is also called Uti, Awti, Utiats’wots’ ashkharh 'land of the people of Utik', Utiats’wots’ gavar’ 'district of the people of Utik', Utiakan ashkharh and Utiakan gavar’ 'Utian land/district'. It is identified with the place names Otene in Ptolemy's Geography, Otenon in the Latin Ravenna Cosmography, and Ūdh in the Arabic history Futuh al-Buldan by al-Baladhuri. It may also be identifiable with the land called Outia by Strabo. According to Robert H. Hewsen, the name of Utik is likely connected with the ethnonyms Outioi, mentioned by Strabo and Herodotus, and Udini, mentioned by Pliny. However, Pliny also mentions a group called the Uti, which suggests that this is a separate group from the Udini. Wolfgang Schulze writes that Otene and Uti(k) are not necessarily related and may refer to two distinct regions. Udi-/uti- may be an old toponym referring to the lowlands between the Kura River, the Arax, and the mountains of Karabakh. The place name is related to the name of the Udi people, who live in the South Caucasus today.

Geography

According to the Armenian geography Ashkharhatsuyts (7th century, attributed to Anania Shirakatsi), Utik was the twelfth of the fifteen provinces of the Kingdom of Greater Armenia, and belonged, at the time, to Caucasian Albania (the provinces of Utik and Artsakh had been lost by Armenia after its partition in the 4th century). According to Ashkharatsuyts, Utik consisted of eight districts (gavar’s in Armenian): Aranrot, Tri, Rotparsyan, Aghve, Tuskstak (Tavush), Gardman, Shakashen, and Uti Arandznak ('Uti Proper'). The province was bounded by the Kura River from north-east, the river Arax from south-east, and by the province of Artsakh from the west. According to Hewsen, in the Ashkharhatsuyts, in contrast with other old Armenian sources, the principality of Utik is combined with the separate principalities of Gardman and Shakashen (consisting of the districts of Shakashen and Tuskstak). Additionally, the districts of Tri and Rotestak/Rotparsyan may have formed a separate principality of the Gargarians during the Arsacid period.

Utik was the site of the settlement of Khaghkhagh, which Agathangelos calls the "winter quarters of the Armenian kings" but which Elishe and Movses Kaghankatvatsi call the quarters of the Albanian kings. Its location is uncertain. Suren Yeremian places the city of Ainiana, mentioned by Strabo as being located in Outia, with modern Aghdam, but, in Hewsen's view, this is also uncertain. Utik was the site of a settlement called Tigranakert, built by Tigranes I in the 2nd–1st century BC. It may have been located in Gardman in the valley of the Shamkir (Shamkor) River.

History

The territory of Utik was controlled by the Achaemenid Empire. Herodotus reports that the Outians were located in the fourteenth satrapy of that empire and that they formed part of the Persian army together with the Mykoi at Doriscus. The Outians and the Mykoi, identified with the Yutiya and Maka of Achaemenid inscriptions, may have been migrants from southeastern Iran, although, according to another view, these groups were only ever located in southeastern Iran. According to Hewsen, Utik seems to have been part of the satrapy of Media and the succeeding kingdom of Media Atropatene until the 2nd century BC, when, according to Strabo, Artaxias I of Greater Armenia conquered the lands of Syunik and Caspiane and the lands that lay between them, i.e., Utik and Artsakh. Some Armenian scholars like Babken Harutiunian and Asatur Mnatsakanian believe that Syunik and Utik were already controlled by Armenia under the Orontid dynasty and were reconquered by Artaxias I, but Hewsen writes that there is no evidence to support this claim.

Utik remained a part of Armenia for some 500 years after Artaxias's conquest, although the Armenian-Albanian boundary along the Kura River was often overrun by armies of both countries. It was lost as a result of the Roman–Persian peace of 363 AD, but, according to the author of Buzandaran Patmut’iwnk’, in 370 AD the Armenian sparapet Mushegh Mamikonian defeated the Albanians and restored the frontier back to the river Kura. In 387 AD, the Sassanid Empire helped the Albanians to seize from the Kingdom of Armenia a number of provinces, including Utik. Although there is some evidence that suggests that Utik remained a part of the Persian-controlled kingdom of Armenia even after 387, it was definitely incorporated into Albania after the abolition of the Armenian kingdom in 428.

In the middle of the 5th century, by the order of the Persian king Peroz I, the king Vache of Caucasian Albania built in Utik the city initially called Perozapat, and later Partaw and Barda, and made it the capital of Caucasian Albania. (Partaw may have existed previously as a town or a village by that name.) According to another view, Peroz I constructed the city himself after deposing the ruling family of Albania. The princes of Utik, who formed part of the Armenian nobility, remained as rulers the province under Albanian and, later, Arab rule. After the fall of the Albanian kingdom in the early 6th century, it was not the princes of Utik, however, but those of Gardman who became the dominant princes of Albania. They were recognized as Presiding Princes of Albania by the Byzantine emperor Heraclius in 628 and remained in this position until 822. In 922, Utik was annexed by the Bagratid kingdom of Armenia, but this included only part of the province's historical territory. According to Cyril Toumanoff, the descendants of the princes of Utik were present in southern Artsakh as late as the 11th century. Later, Artsakh and Utik were known as Karabakh, with the territory of Utik forming the lowland or steppe part of Karabakh.

Population

In ancient times, the area was inhabited by Armenians and "Utis" (likely the ancestors of modern-day Udi people). The early Armenian historian Movses Khorenatsi writes that the princes of Utik descended from Sisak, a descendant of the legendary Armenian progenitor Hayk and the reputed ancestor of the princes of Syunik. Mnatsakanian has cited this as Hewsen writes that "t seems likely that except for Siwnik', eastern Armenia was not much more than armenized" and that the Utians were "almost certainly a Caucasian tribe." Historian Tim Greenwood writes that by the time of the composition of the Ashkharhatsuyts, Utik, along with the provinces of Artsakh and Gugark, were no longer administratively part of Armenian but "they were evidently remembered as once having been Armenian and may have still contained communities who thought of themselves and the settlements they occupied as Armenian."

Utik had been one of the provinces of Greater Armenia, the population of which is referred to by the name Udini (or Utidorsi) in Latin sources, and by the name Outioi in Greek sources. However, Ancient Greco-Roman writers placed the Udis beyond Utik, north of the Kura River.

Pliny the Elder names both the Uti and the Udini among the tribes living in eastern Transcaucasia and calls the latter a Scythian tribe ("Scytharum populus"). This suggests the possibility that some Iranian-speaking or, less likely, Finno-Ugric peoples may have settled in the area and adopted the language of the local Caucasian population). More likely, however, the terms refer not to any specific ethnic group in the modern sense but simply the inhabitants of the eponymous region.

See also

Notes

  1. Without the suffix -k’, which forms the nominative plural and the names of countries
  2. Hariutiunian considers the juncture of the Kura and its tributary the Zayamchay (Zakam) to be a likely location. Other proposed locations are the confluence of the Kura and the Aghstafa or further up the Aghstafa.
  3. Strabo refers to Phauene, which some scholars read as *Sauene and identify with Syunik.
  4. Elsewhere in the same work, however, Hewsen writes that it is possible that Orontid domains extended to the confluence of the Kura and the Arax.

References

  1. ^ Chaumont, M. L. (1985). "Albania". Encyclopædia Iranica, Online Edition. Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. The more or less self-interested loyalty of the Albanians explains why the Sasanians helped them to seize from the Armenians the provinces (or districts) of Uti (with the towns of Xałxał and Pʿartaw), Šakašēn, Kołṭʿ, Gardman, and Arcʿax. (...) These territories were to remain in the possession of Albania; a reconquest by Mušeł (cf. Pʿawstos, ibid.) was unlikely.
  2. ^ Harutiunian, B. (1986). "Utikʻ". In Arzumanian, Makich; et al. (eds.). Haykakan sovetakan hanragitaran [Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia] (in Armenian). Vol. 12. Erevan: Haykakan hanragitarani glkhavor khmbagrutʻyun. pp. 267–269. Cite error: The named reference "ASE" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ Hewsen, Robert H. (1992). The Geography of Ananias of Širak (Ašxarhac῾oyc῾): The Long and the Short Recensions. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag. p. 260. ISBN 3-88226-485-3.
  4. ^ Hewsen, Robert H. (2001). Armenia: A Historical Atlas. University of Chicago Press. p. 58. ISBN 0-226-33228-4.
  5. Schulze, Wolfgang (2018). "Caucasian Albanian and the Question of Language and Ethnicity". In Mumm, Peter-Arnold (ed.). Völker und Phantome: Sprach- und kulturwissenschaftliche Studien zur Ethnizität (1st ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 289.
  6. Anania Shirakatsi, "Geography"
  7. Hewsen 2001, p. 102.
  8. ^ Garsoïan, Nina G. (1989). The Epic Histories Attributed to Pʻawstos Buzand (Buzandaran Patmutʻiwnkʻ). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 498. ISBN 0-674-25865-7.
  9. Hewsen 2001, map 52.
  10. Hewsen, Robert H. (1982). "Ethno-History and the Armenian Influence upon the Caucasian Albanians". In Samuelian, Thomas J. (ed.). Classical Armenian Culture: Influences and Creativity. Chico, CA: Scholars Press. p. 33. ISBN 0-89130-565-3.
  11. Akopian , Aleksan (2022). Albaniia-Aluank v greko-latinskikh i drevnearmianskikh istochnikakh (in Russian) (2nd, rev. ed.). Yerevan: Gitutyun. pp. 67–68. ISBN 978-5-8080-1485-5.
  12. ^ Hewsen 1982, p. 32.
  13. Hewsen 2001, p. 32.
  14. Dum-Tragut, Jasmine; Gippert, Jost (2023). "Caucasian Albania in Medieval Armenian Sources (5th–13th Centuries)". In Gippert, Jost; Dum-Tragut, Jasmine (eds.). Caucasian Albania: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 48. doi:10.1515/9783110794687-002. ISBN 978-3-11-079459-5.
  15. Hewsen 1992, p. 263.
  16. Gadjiev, Murtazali (2017). "Construction Activities of Kavād I in Caucasian Albania". Iran and the Caucasus. 21 (2). Brill: 122–123. doi:10.1163/1573384X-20170202.
  17. Mutafian, Claude (2024). "Survey of Historical Geography of the South Caucasus from the Middle Ages to the Present Day". In Dorfmann-Lazarev, Igor; Khatchadourian, Haroutioun (eds.). Monuments and Identities in the Caucasus: Karabagh, Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan in Contemporary Geopolitical Conflict. Leiden: Brill. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-90-04-67738-8.
  18. Hewsen 1992, p. 195.
  19. ^ Igor Kuznetsov. Udis.
  20. Agathangelos, History of St. Gregory
  21. Moses Khorenatsʻi (2006). History of the Armenians. Translation and commentary by Robert W. Thomson (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: Caravan Books. p. 137 (Book II, Chapter 8). ISBN 978-0-88206-111-5.
  22. Greenwood, Tim (29 August 2019). "Armenian Space in Late Antiquity". In Van Nuffelen, Peter (ed.). Historiography and Space in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press. p. 84. doi:10.1017/9781108686686.004. ISBN 978-1-108-68668-6.
  23. "Wolfgang Schulze. The Language of the 'Caucasian Albanian' (Aluan) Palimpses". Archived from the original on 2001-10-30. Retrieved 2001-10-30.
  24. Pliny. Natural History, Book VI, Chapter 15.
  25. Schulze, Wolfgang (May 2017). "Caucasian Albanian and the Question of Language and Ethnicity". Language and Ethnic Identity – via ResearchGate.
Historical states and regions of Armenia
Independent Armenian
states
Armenian Empire under Tigranes the Great
Minor or dependent
Armenian states
Provinces or Ashkhars
of Armenia Major
Other Armenian regions
Other provinces under
Tigranes the Great
Historical regions of Caucasian Albania

Categories: