| Revision as of 16:08, 15 July 2024 editSwatjester (talk | contribs)Administrators27,531 edits →Beautifully said← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:18, 4 August 2024 edit undo100.36.106.199 (talk) →ANI: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
| At . And I didn't understand ''at all'' the OP's response to my post. I mean *really* - it didn't make any sense. At all. And now that I think of it I bet they used ChatGPT or some AI tool to write that exceedingly wordy and incredibly nonsensical reply... I thought about posting exactly how to adjust the archiving and maybe tell them the editor who instituted the archiving (because I did a search! SO hard y'know) but then I thought Naw they're experienced, they should know this stuff or at least be able to '''look it up & learn how'''. - ] (]) 14:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | At . And I didn't understand ''at all'' the OP's response to my post. I mean *really* - it didn't make any sense. At all. And now that I think of it I bet they used ChatGPT or some AI tool to write that exceedingly wordy and incredibly nonsensical reply... I thought about posting exactly how to adjust the archiving and maybe tell them the editor who instituted the archiving (because I did a search! SO hard y'know) but then I thought Naw they're experienced, they should know this stuff or at least be able to '''look it up & learn how'''. - ] (]) 14:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Yeah, it was pretty strange. ]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 16:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | :Yeah, it was pretty strange. ]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 16:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == ANI == | |||
| Thanks for your ]. I am the instigator of the AN/I thread, although because AN/I is semi-protected, I am not able to post there. Perhaps you could carry the following over, as a response to your question? Thanks. Also pinging {{ping|Ravenswing}} who redoubled your request. ] (]) 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Well you can read ], especially the more recent part (starting ]), but in essence the complaint is about a continuing violation of policies/guidelines on original research and synthesis, and an unwillingness to adjust in the face of criticism or consensus. I think the clearest indication of the latter problem is captured in ]. In this series of edits you can see Radlrb repeatedly restored ] content after objection (and while the actual edits on the article are just the two of us, you can see from associated discussions that numerous other editors have endorsed my diagnosis, e.g. ). The problems are quite widespread, as explained e.g. . ] (]) 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 4 August 2024
Φ
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Sept 25: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| September 25, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team ~~~~~ | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
DF21
Hello I did add a reference/source to my edit.https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3109809/chinas-aircraft-carrier-killer-missiles-successfully-hit-target 158.223.166.78 (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- You added an incorrectly formatted external link to a section that does not take external links, with no indication as to what claim it is supposed to be supporting. That's not adding a reference, that's linkspam. ⇒SWATJester 16:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
annual warrior competition
The sky sword unit is a Chinese special forces unit belonging to the PLAAF Airborne Brigade 158.223.166.78 (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- You need to provide a properly formatted reference for that claim. ⇒SWATJester 16:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Swatjester. Thank you for your work on Mako (missile). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Misplaced Pages by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
People will object
With regard to "people will object just to the re-organizing despite what WP:PGCHANGE and WP:PGBOLD say," I'd change "people" to "one person in particular." Can you say Misplaced Pages:Status quo stonewalling? - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think the number of people who would do this is quite a few, unfortunately. ⇒SWATJester 18:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thu April 25: WikiNYC Hacking Night
| April 25: Hacking Night @ Prime Produce | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for NYC Hacking Night at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan. It is intended primarily for technical contributors, though newcomers are welcome as well! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct and Wikimedia's Technical Code of Conduct. Meeting info:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Reliable?
https://issuu.com/burmamilitarysecrets/docs/_207c2042c2f9a0/1|
https://www.rbnr.it/my/prodotto/itagl-00128/
These sources contain a lot of info about organisional structure of RIfle Platoon and RIfle Company. Do you think they're reliable enough to be writen on wiki?
As for interview of the POW, the Colour Sergenat (sometimes called Master Sergeant) in Myanmar tells that a Rifle Company, in practice, only have 50 men in total. You can check it in here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_1fRaUZl3w he said that around 7:06 The Burmese Editor (talk) 23:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Burmese Editor: The issuu.com one is not reliable enough. As best I can tell, it's just a pdf sharing website, there's no editorial control and per WP:UGC:
Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is generally unacceptable. Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites.
In general that also applies to Youtube -- there is a consensus that it is generally unreliable and should not be allowed as a source WP:RSPYT. I could not get the other site to load, so I don't know what's on it. ⇒SWATJester 00:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- Ohh, got it. I guess those documents are not consdered reliable enough. What of the POW interview? Is that considered reliable enough? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_1fRaUZl3w The Burmese Editor (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Burmese Editor: unfortunately no. The community has determined by consensus at Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#YouTube that YouTube is a generally unreliable source, and with limited exceptions we can't use it. ⇒SWATJester 01:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ohh, got it. I guess those documents are not consdered reliable enough. What of the POW interview? Is that considered reliable enough? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_1fRaUZl3w The Burmese Editor (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Burmese Editor: The issuu.com one is not reliable enough. As best I can tell, it's just a pdf sharing website, there's no editorial control and per WP:UGC:
June 26: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| June 26: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Online-Only WikiWednesday Salon on Zoom. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! This special online-only WikiWednesday will be dedicated to the Wikimedia Movement Charter referendum, and also to exploring future options of other online-centric events for our Wikimedia NYC chapter. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. Meeting info:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Tupac Page
The page for Tupac can now be edited by everyone; it wasn't like that before. Previously, only administrators and users with permission could edit it. This rule needs to be reinstated, or it will be edited every day. Pier1999 (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Articles are not generally permanently protected; "it will be edited every day" is perfectly fine. Protection is put into place to deal with intractable behavior issues, not to prevent good-faith editing. ⇒SWATJester 14:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, all right. However, a lot has happened in these hours Pier1999 (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- ActionHeroesAreReal He came back to edit the page without consent, so Human and I had to edit all the time. So an administrator had to close it to avoid the edit war. And this happened because I had addressed the Misplaced Pages section on vandalism (the one you suggested to Human). Pier1999 (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, all right. However, a lot has happened in these hours Pier1999 (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Fri July 19: Wikicurious in NYC, Editing Misplaced Pages for Beginners
| July 19: Wikicurious: Editing Misplaced Pages for Beginners @ Civic Hall | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for the inaugural event of the beginner-focused Wikicurious series at Civic Hall! All are welcome, and newcomers and aspiring editors are especially encouraged to attend. Registration via Eventbrite is required for building entry, and is also encouraged on the event page on Meta. The Wikicurious series at Civic Hall is supported by Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Wikimedia NYC is an official affiliate and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. Meeting info:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Beautifully said
At User talk:Σ. And I didn't understand at all the OP's response to my post. I mean *really* - it didn't make any sense. At all. And now that I think of it I bet they used ChatGPT or some AI tool to write that exceedingly wordy and incredibly nonsensical reply... I thought about posting exactly how to adjust the archiving and maybe tell them the editor who instituted the archiving (because I did a search! SO hard y'know) but then I thought Naw they're experienced, they should know this stuff or at least be able to look it up & learn how. - Shearonink (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was pretty strange. ⇒SWATJester 16:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
ANI
Thanks for your your comment. I am the instigator of the AN/I thread, although because AN/I is semi-protected, I am not able to post there. Perhaps you could carry the following over, as a response to your question? Thanks. Also pinging @Ravenswing: who redoubled your request. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Well you can read the long WPM thread, especially the more recent part (starting here), but in essence the complaint is about a continuing violation of policies/guidelines on original research and synthesis, and an unwillingness to adjust in the face of criticism or consensus. I think the clearest indication of the latter problem is captured in this comment. In this series of edits you can see Radlrb repeatedly restored WP:SYNTH content after objection (and while the actual edits on the article are just the two of us, you can see from associated discussions that numerous other editors have endorsed my diagnosis, e.g. ). The problems are quite widespread, as explained e.g. in this message. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)