Misplaced Pages

Macdonald triad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:38, 28 May 2024 edit100.16.247.85 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:03, 6 August 2024 edit undoKej9 (talk | contribs)1 edit Major rewrite for clarity, neutrality, and comprehensiveness. Expanded lead, addressed context and technical language issues, updated information based on current research, and corrected formatting per MOS.Tag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Set of behavioral characteristics}} {{short description|Set of behavioral characteristics hypothesized to be associated with later violent tendencies}}
{{Multiple issues|1=
{{Context|date=November 2023|reason=The lead needs to highlight that this article is about a scientific hypothesis.}}
{{Research paper|date=November 2023}}
{{Improve lead|date=November 2023}}
{{Lead extra info|date=November 2023}}
}}


== Macdonald triad ==
<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THE LINKS TO SOCIOPATHY AND HOMICIDAL IN THE INTRODUCTION-->
The '''Macdonald triad''' (also known as the ''triad of ]'' or the ''] triad'') is a set of three factors, the presence of any two of which are considered to be predictive of, or associated with, ], particularly with relation to ]. The triad was first proposed by ] ] in "The Threat to Kill", a 1963 article in the '']''.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Macdonald |first1=John M. |title=The threat to kill |journal=American Journal of Psychiatry |date=August 1963 |volume=120 |issue=2 |pages=125–130 |doi=10.1176/ajp.120.2.125 }}</ref> Small-scale studies conducted by psychiatrists Daniel Hellman and Nathan Blackman, and then FBI agents ] and ] along with ], claimed substantial evidence for the association of these childhood patterns with later ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ressler |first1=Robert K. |last2=Burgess |first2=Ann W. |last3=Douglas |first3=John E. |date=1988 |title=Sexual Homicide Patterns and Motives |publisher=Simon and Schuster |location=New York, NY |isbn=978-0-669-16559-3 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/sexualh_res_1988_00_3513 }}{{pn|date=March 2023}}</ref> Although it remains an influential and widely taught hypothesis, subsequent research has generally not validated this line of thinking.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bartol |first1=Curt R. |last2=Bartol |first2=Anne M. |chapter=Crime Scene Profiling |pages=21–56 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DsI5DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 |title=Criminal & Behavioral Profiling |date=2012 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-8308-2 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Franklin |first1=Karen |title=Homicidal Triad: Predictor of Violence or Urban Myth? |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/witness/201205/homicidal-triad-predictor-violence-or-urban-myth |work=Psychology Today |date=2 May 2012 }}</ref>


The '''Macdonald triad''', also known as the '''triad of sociopathy''' or the '''homicidal triad''', is a controversial hypothesis that suggests a link between three childhood behaviors – animal cruelty, firesetting, and enuresis (bedwetting) – and later violent tendencies, particularly serial offenses. First proposed by psychiatrist J. M. Macdonald in 1963, the triad has been widely taught and remains influential in some circles. However, subsequent research has largely failed to validate the hypothesis, and it is now considered by many to be an urban legend.
The triad links ], ], and persistent ] past the age of five, to violent behaviors, particularly homicidal behavior and sexually predatory behavior.<ref name="singer">{{cite journal |last1=Singer |first1=Stephen D. |last2=Hensley |first2=Christopher |date=2004 |title=Learning theory to childhood and adolescent firesetting: Can it lead to serial murder? |journal=International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology |doi=10.1177/0306624X04265087 |pmid=15245657 |volume=48 |issue=4 |pages=461–476|s2cid=5991918 }}</ref> However, other studies claim not to have found statistically significant links between the triad and violent offenders.


While the triad has been popularized in criminology and forensic psychology, it is important to emphasize that the presence of these behaviors in childhood does not guarantee future violence. Furthermore, focusing solely on the triad can distract from other, more robust predictors of violent behavior and potential interventions.
Further studies have suggested that these behaviors are actually more linked to childhood experience of parental neglect, brutality, or ]. Some argue ''this'' in turn results in "homicidal proneness."<ref>{{cite book |last=Dicanio |first=Margaret |date=2004 |title=Encyclopedia of Violence |publisher=iUniverse |isbn=0-595-31652-2}}</ref> The "triad" concept as a particular combination of behaviors linked to violence may not have any particular validity, however, and it has been called an ].<ref>{{cite conference |last1=Skrapec |first1=Candice A. |last2=Ryan |first2=Kori |title=The Macdonald Triad: Persistence of an Urban Legend |conference=The American Society of Criminology 62nd Annual Meeting |date=2010 |s2cid=142840207}}{{vs|date=March 2023}}</ref>


== History and Development ==
According to Douglas and his fellow researchers, while the triad behaviors are not causal when examining a relationship with later predatory behavior, they are nonetheless predictive of an increased likelihood of the future emergence of such violent behavior patterns, and can give professionals a chance to halt these patterns before they progress.{{fact|date=March 2023}}


J. M. Macdonald first introduced the concept of the triad in his 1963 article ''The Threat to Kill'' published in the ''American Journal of Psychiatry''.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Macdonald |first1=John M. |title=The threat to kill |journal=American Journal of Psychiatry |date=August 1963 |volume=120 |issue=2 |pages=125–130 |doi=10.1176/ajp.120.2.125 }}</ref> He based his observations on a small sample of patients who had threatened to kill. Later, psychiatrists Daniel Hellman and Nathan Blackman, and FBI agents John E. Douglas and Robert K. Ressler, along with Ann Burgess, conducted small-scale studies that they claimed supported the association of these childhood behaviors with later predatory behavior.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ressler |first1=Robert K. |last2=Burgess |first2=Ann W. |last3=Douglas |first3=John E. |date=1988 |title=Sexual Homicide Patterns and Motives |publisher=Simon and Schuster |location=New York, NY |isbn=978-0-669-16559-3 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/sexualh_res_1988_00_3513 }}</ref>
==Arson==
{{Citation style|section|reason=The names of researchers, research articles and dates of publications need to be cited in numbered footnotes, not text. Any sentence attributing research findings to specific researchers needs to explain the findings and conclusion in terms of what the named researchers found, not a text reference citing their research.|date=November 2023}}
] or fire-setting is theorized to be a less severe or first shot at releasing ].<ref name="singer"/> Extensive periods of humiliation have been found to be present in the childhoods of several adult ]. These repetitive episodes of humiliation can lead to feelings of frustration and anger, which need to somehow be released in order to return to a normal state of self-worth.<ref name="singer"/> However, the triad combination has been questioned in this regard also, and a review has suggested that this behavior is just one that can occur in the context of childhood antisocial behavior and is not necessarily predictive of later violence.<ref>{{cite periodical |date=2006 |title=Firesetting as a predictor of violence |periodical=Bushfire Arson Bulletin |number=36 |location=Canberra |publisher=Australian Institute of Criminology |url=https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab36 }}</ref>


== The Three Behaviors ==
==Cruelty to animals==
{{Citation style|section|reason=The names of researchers, research articles and dates of publications need to be cited in numbered footnotes, not text. Any sentence attributing research findings to specific researchers needs to explain the findings and conclusion in terms of what the named researchers found, not a text reference citing their research.|date=November 2023}}
] special agent Alan Brantly believed that some offenders kill animals as a rehearsal for killing human victims.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Barnard |first1=N. D. |last2=Hogan |first2=A. R. |date=6 June 1999 |title=Moving up the chain of abuse pattern shows cruelty to animals is one predictor of violent behavior in adults |newspaper=Seattle Post-Intelligencer |page=C.1 }}</ref> Cruelty to animals is mainly used to vent frustration and anger the same way firesetting is. Extensive amounts of humiliation were also found in the childhoods of children who engaged in acts of cruelty to animals. During childhood, ] could not retaliate toward those who caused them humiliation, so they chose animals because they were viewed as weak and vulnerable. Future victim selection is already in the process at a young age. Studies have found that those who engaged in childhood acts of cruelty to animals used the same method of killing on their human victims as they did on their animal victims.<ref name="Wright & Hensley 2003">{{cite journal |last1=Wright |first1=Jeremy |last2=Hensley |first2=Christopher |title=From Animal Cruelty to Serial Murder: Applying the Graduation Hypothesis |journal=International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology |date=February 2003 |volume=47 |issue=1 |pages=71–88 |doi=10.1177/0306624X02239276 |pmid=12613433 |s2cid=30141899 |url=https://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/msu_theses_dissertations/458 }}</ref>


=== Animal Cruelty ===
Wright and Hensley (2003) named three recurring themes in their study of five cases of serial murderers: As children, they vented their frustrations because the person causing them anger or humiliation was too powerful to take down; they felt as if they regained some control and power over their lives through the torture and killing of the animals; they gained the power and control they desired by causing pain and suffering of a weaker, more vulnerable animal – escalating to humans in the future.<ref name="Wright & Hensley 2003"/>


In a study of 45 male prison inmates who were deemed violent offenders, McClellan (2003) found that 56% admitted to having committed acts of violence against animals. It was also found that children who abused animals were more often the victims of parental abuse than children who did not abuse animals.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=McClellan |first1=Janet |title=Animal Cruelty and Violent Behavior |journal=Journal of Security Education |date=18 December 2007 |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=29–45 |doi=10.1300/J460v02n04_04 |doi-broken-date=31 January 2024 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J460v02n04_04 }}</ref> The triad suggests that cruelty to animals, often involving torture or killing, may be a precursor to violence against humans. Some proponents of the triad theorized that this behavior served as a rehearsal for future violence. However, critics argue that animal cruelty is often a symptom of broader antisocial behavior and does not necessarily predict future violence against humans.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Patterson-Kane |first1=Emily G. |last2=Piper |first2=Heather |title=Animal Abuse as a Sentinel for Human Violence: A Critique |journal=Journal of Social Issues |date=September 2009 |volume=65 |issue=3 |pages=589–614 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01615.x }}</ref>


=== Firesetting ===
In a 2004 study, which considered not one-off events but patterns of repeat violence, Tallichet and Hensley found a link between repeated animal cruelty and violence against humans. They examined prisoners in maximum or medium security prisons.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tallichet |first1=Suzanne E. |last2=Hensley |first2=Christopher |title=Exploring the Link between Recurrent Acts of Childhood and Adolescent Animal Cruelty and Subsequent Violent Crime |journal=Criminal Justice Review |date=September 2004 |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=304–316 |doi=10.1177/073401680402900203 |s2cid=146536264 }}</ref> However, overgeneralizing possible links between animal violence and human violence can have unwanted consequences such as detracting focus from other possible predictors or causes.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Patterson-Kane |first1=Emily G. |last2=Piper |first2=Heather |title=Animal Abuse as a Sentinel for Human Violence: A Critique |journal=Journal of Social Issues |date=September 2009 |volume=65 |issue=3 |pages=589–614 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01615.x }}</ref>


Firesetting, particularly when it goes beyond simple curiosity, is another behavior associated with the triad. It's been suggested that firesetting can be a way to release pent-up anger or frustration. However, like animal cruelty, firesetting is often a component of broader antisocial behavior and does not necessarily indicate future violence.<ref>{{cite periodical |date=2006 |title=Firesetting as a predictor of violence |periodical=Bushfire Arson Bulletin |number=36 |location=Canberra |publisher=Australian Institute of Criminology |url=https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab36 }}</ref>
==Enuresis==
] is "unintentional bed-wetting during sleep, persistent after the age of five."<ref name=Hickey2010p101/> The bed-wetting must continue twice a week for at least three consecutive months.


=== Enuresis (Bedwetting) ===
Some authors{{Who|date=January 2018}} continue to speculate that enuresis may be related to firesetting and animal cruelty. One argument is that because persistent bed-wetting beyond the age of five can be humiliating for a child, especially if they are belittled by a parental figure or other adult as a result, the child could use firesetting or cruelty to animals as an outlet for their frustration. Bedwetting into the tween and teen years has also been used as an indicator of possible childhood sexual abuse. Enuresis, firesetting, and cruelty to animals are more likely indicators of sustained physical or emotional abuse toward the child, or underlying mental illness that will, in turn, cause those behaviors.<ref name="singer"/> One researcher notes that enuresis is an "unconscious, involuntary, and nonviolent act and therefore linking it to violent crime is more problematic than doing so with animal cruelty or firesetting."<ref name=Hickey2010p101>{{cite book |last=Hickey |first=Eric |date=2010 |title=Serial Murderers and their Victims |publisher=Wadsworth, Cengage Learning |location=Belmont, CA |isbn=978-4-9560081-4-3 |page=101 }}</ref>

Enuresis, or bedwetting that persists beyond the age of five, is the final component of the triad. The hypothesis suggests that the humiliation and shame associated with bedwetting can contribute to later violent behavior. However, this link is particularly weak, and enuresis is more likely associated with other factors, such as developmental issues or stress.<ref name=Hickey2010p101>{{cite book |last=Hickey |first=Eric |date=2010 |title=Serial Murderers and their Victims |publisher=Wadsworth, Cengage Learning |location=Belmont, CA |isbn=978-4-9560081-4-3 |page=101 }}</ref>

== Criticisms and Limitations ==

The Macdonald triad has faced significant criticism and is now largely considered a flawed hypothesis. Key limitations include:

* '''Lack of Empirical Support:''' Large-scale studies have consistently failed to find a strong correlation between the triad and later violent behavior.
* '''Small Sample Sizes:''' Early studies supporting the triad were based on small, non-representative samples.
* '''Correlation vs. Causation:''' Even when correlations are found, they do not prove causation. Other factors, such as childhood abuse or neglect, are likely more significant contributors to violent behavior.
* '''Oversimplification:''' The triad reduces complex human behavior to a simple formula, ignoring the multitude of factors that contribute to violence.
* '''Potential for Misdiagnosis and Stigmatization:''' Misapplication of the triad can lead to misdiagnosis and stigmatization of children who exhibit these behaviors.

== Alternative Explanations ==

Instead of focusing on the triad, research now emphasizes the importance of considering a broader range of factors that contribute to violent behavior. These include:

* '''Childhood Abuse and Neglect:''' Experiencing physical, emotional, or sexual abuse in childhood is a strong predictor of later violence.
* '''Exposure to Violence:''' Witnessing violence in the home or community can increase the likelihood of engaging in violence later in life.
* '''Substance Abuse:''' Substance abuse is often linked to violent behavior.
* '''Mental Health Issues:''' Untreated mental health conditions can contribute to violent behavior.

== Conclusion ==

The Macdonald triad, while historically influential, lacks robust empirical support and is now considered by many experts to be an urban legend. Focusing solely on this triad can distract from more effective approaches to understanding and preventing violence. It is crucial to consider a wider range of factors, particularly childhood abuse and neglect, when assessing the risk of violent behavior.

== See also ==


==See also==
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]


==References== == References ==

{{reflist|30em}} {{reflist|30em}}


==Further reading== == Further reading ==

* {{cite journal |last1=Parfitt |first1=Charlotte Hannah |last2=Alleyne |first2=Emma |title=Not the Sum of Its Parts: A Critical Review of the MacDonald Triad |journal=Trauma, Violence, & Abuse |date=April 2020 |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=300–310 |doi=10.1177/1524838018764164 |pmid=29631500 |s2cid=206738131 |url=https://kar.kent.ac.uk/66782/1/Parfitt%20%26%20Alleyne%20%28in%20press%29.pdf }} * {{cite journal |last1=Parfitt |first1=Charlotte Hannah |last2=Alleyne |first2=Emma |title=Not the Sum of Its Parts: A Critical Review of the MacDonald Triad |journal=Trauma, Violence, & Abuse |date=April 2020 |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=300–310 |doi=10.1177/1524838018764164 |pmid=29631500 |s2cid=206738131 |url=https://kar.kent.ac.uk/66782/1/Parfitt%20%26%20Alleyne%20%28in%20press%29.pdf }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bennell |first1=Craig |last2=Snook |first2=Brent |last3=Macdonald |first3=Sarah |last4=House |first4=John C. |last5=Taylor |first5=Paul J. |title=Computerized Crime Linkage Systems: A Critical Review and Research Agenda |journal=Criminal Justice and Behavior |date=May 2012 |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=620–634 |doi=10.1177/0093854811435210 |s2cid=56135262 |url=https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/53598/4/Bennell_et_al_ViCLAS_Final_Nov_21.pdf }} * {{cite journal |last1=Bennell |first1=Craig |last2=Snook |first2=Brent |last3=Macdonald |first3=Sarah |last4=House |first4=John C. |last5=Taylor |first5=Paul J. |title=Computerized Crime Linkage Systems: A Critical Review and Research Agenda |journal=Criminal Justice and Behavior |date=May 2012 |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=620–634 |doi=10.1177/0093854811435210 |s2cid=56135262 |url=https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/53598/4/Bennell_et_al_ViCLAS_Final_Nov_21.pdf }}
Line 54: Line 70:
] ]
] ]
] ]

Revision as of 12:03, 6 August 2024

Set of behavioral characteristics hypothesized to be associated with later violent tendencies

Macdonald triad

The Macdonald triad, also known as the triad of sociopathy or the homicidal triad, is a controversial hypothesis that suggests a link between three childhood behaviors – animal cruelty, firesetting, and enuresis (bedwetting) – and later violent tendencies, particularly serial offenses. First proposed by psychiatrist J. M. Macdonald in 1963, the triad has been widely taught and remains influential in some circles. However, subsequent research has largely failed to validate the hypothesis, and it is now considered by many to be an urban legend.

While the triad has been popularized in criminology and forensic psychology, it is important to emphasize that the presence of these behaviors in childhood does not guarantee future violence. Furthermore, focusing solely on the triad can distract from other, more robust predictors of violent behavior and potential interventions.

History and Development

J. M. Macdonald first introduced the concept of the triad in his 1963 article The Threat to Kill published in the American Journal of Psychiatry. He based his observations on a small sample of patients who had threatened to kill. Later, psychiatrists Daniel Hellman and Nathan Blackman, and FBI agents John E. Douglas and Robert K. Ressler, along with Ann Burgess, conducted small-scale studies that they claimed supported the association of these childhood behaviors with later predatory behavior.

The Three Behaviors

Animal Cruelty

The triad suggests that cruelty to animals, often involving torture or killing, may be a precursor to violence against humans. Some proponents of the triad theorized that this behavior served as a rehearsal for future violence. However, critics argue that animal cruelty is often a symptom of broader antisocial behavior and does not necessarily predict future violence against humans.

Firesetting

Firesetting, particularly when it goes beyond simple curiosity, is another behavior associated with the triad. It's been suggested that firesetting can be a way to release pent-up anger or frustration. However, like animal cruelty, firesetting is often a component of broader antisocial behavior and does not necessarily indicate future violence.

Enuresis (Bedwetting)

Enuresis, or bedwetting that persists beyond the age of five, is the final component of the triad. The hypothesis suggests that the humiliation and shame associated with bedwetting can contribute to later violent behavior. However, this link is particularly weak, and enuresis is more likely associated with other factors, such as developmental issues or stress.

Criticisms and Limitations

The Macdonald triad has faced significant criticism and is now largely considered a flawed hypothesis. Key limitations include:

  • Lack of Empirical Support: Large-scale studies have consistently failed to find a strong correlation between the triad and later violent behavior.
  • Small Sample Sizes: Early studies supporting the triad were based on small, non-representative samples.
  • Correlation vs. Causation: Even when correlations are found, they do not prove causation. Other factors, such as childhood abuse or neglect, are likely more significant contributors to violent behavior.
  • Oversimplification: The triad reduces complex human behavior to a simple formula, ignoring the multitude of factors that contribute to violence.
  • Potential for Misdiagnosis and Stigmatization: Misapplication of the triad can lead to misdiagnosis and stigmatization of children who exhibit these behaviors.

Alternative Explanations

Instead of focusing on the triad, research now emphasizes the importance of considering a broader range of factors that contribute to violent behavior. These include:

  • Childhood Abuse and Neglect: Experiencing physical, emotional, or sexual abuse in childhood is a strong predictor of later violence.
  • Exposure to Violence: Witnessing violence in the home or community can increase the likelihood of engaging in violence later in life.
  • Substance Abuse: Substance abuse is often linked to violent behavior.
  • Mental Health Issues: Untreated mental health conditions can contribute to violent behavior.

Conclusion

The Macdonald triad, while historically influential, lacks robust empirical support and is now considered by many experts to be an urban legend. Focusing solely on this triad can distract from more effective approaches to understanding and preventing violence. It is crucial to consider a wider range of factors, particularly childhood abuse and neglect, when assessing the risk of violent behavior.

See also

References

  1. Macdonald, John M. (August 1963). "The threat to kill". American Journal of Psychiatry. 120 (2): 125–130. doi:10.1176/ajp.120.2.125.
  2. Ressler, Robert K.; Burgess, Ann W.; Douglas, John E. (1988). Sexual Homicide Patterns and Motives. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-669-16559-3.
  3. Patterson-Kane, Emily G.; Piper, Heather (September 2009). "Animal Abuse as a Sentinel for Human Violence: A Critique". Journal of Social Issues. 65 (3): 589–614. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01615.x.
  4. "Firesetting as a predictor of violence". Bushfire Arson Bulletin. No. 36. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. 2006.
  5. Hickey, Eric (2010). Serial Murderers and their Victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 101. ISBN 978-4-9560081-4-3.

Further reading

Psychopathy
Contexts
Characteristics
Related topics
Notable theorists
Categories: