| Revision as of 10:36, 6 August 2024 editLord Clayton7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users601 edits →POV Maintenance Template: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:45, 6 August 2024 edit undoBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,274 edits AE alert (gg)Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| I wanted to let you know that I have removed the POV Maintenance tag placed by you on top of ]. The tag must be accompanied by an explanation on the talk page, noting the reason for placing the tag. See ] for more info on usage. Cheers, ] (]) 10:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC) | I wanted to let you know that I have removed the POV Maintenance tag placed by you on top of ]. The tag must be accompanied by an explanation on the talk page, noting the reason for placing the tag. See ] for more info on usage. Cheers, ] (]) 10:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Contentious topics alert == | |||
| ] You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see ]. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see ].<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 12:45, 6 August 2024
AFDs and PRODs
Hello, Thewikizoomer,
Your one or two word deletion rationales in AFDs and PRODs are insufficient. In at least one instance, a PROD tag was removed by an admin who found your explanations (like "notability issues" or "significance") insufficient to warrant deletion of an article. Nomination statements should be policy based, explaining why an article should be deleted and demonstrate that a BEFORE has been done by the nominator that indicates they have reviewed existing sources and and looked to see if any additional souces exist that might help establish notability. None of your nominations or deletion rationales do this.
As an example of a decent AFD nomination, please look at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of NCAA Division III independents football records to see what is expected of you if you want to continue to nominate articles for deletion. Do your homework and show to participating editors that you have done a sufficient investigation into the article. A nomination statement should never be your impression of an article, that is just not enough.
You should also consider archiving your talk page discussions instead of just clearing your page after every comment. Archiving talk page messages is what experienced editors do. Please do not delete this message until I've seen your response to it. Thank you. Liz 23:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
POV Maintenance Template
Hello Thewikizoomer,
I wanted to let you know that I have removed the POV Maintenance tag placed by you on top of LGBT rights in India. The tag must be accompanied by an explanation on the talk page, noting the reason for placing the tag. See Template:POV for more info on usage. Cheers, Lord Clayton7 (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Contentious topics alert
You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS.