| Revision as of 15:04, 6 August 2024 edit82.30.193.7 (talk) →August 2024: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:06, 6 August 2024 edit undoCelia Homeford (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,703 edits →August 2024Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :With respect I do not have to take instructions from you, Celia. My changes are factually correct. The wife of a British Prince does gain the rank and status as a Princess by marriage and this should be included in the opening paragraph. You are not the expert on all things royal. A relevant citation has now been added. Please do not remove. Debretts, a clearly reliable source more so than you, clearly states that there are two ways a person can become a Princess of the United Kingdom, either by birth (daughter or granddaughter of a sovereign) or by marriage. This citation is correct. ] (]) 15:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC) | :With respect I do not have to take instructions from you, Celia. My changes are factually correct. The wife of a British Prince does gain the rank and status as a Princess by marriage and this should be included in the opening paragraph. You are not the expert on all things royal. A relevant citation has now been added. Please do not remove. Debretts, a clearly reliable source more so than you, clearly states that there are two ways a person can become a Princess of the United Kingdom, either by birth (daughter or granddaughter of a sovereign) or by marriage. This citation is correct. ] (]) 15:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::What part of "Note that wives are already covered in the introduction: see the edits by ] and myself." do you not understand? Wives are not mentioned anywhere in the letters patent. We do not need citations in the introduction for content already cited in the article body. ] (]) 15:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 6 August 2024
July 2023
Hello, I'm The Herald. An edit that you recently made to Anne, Princess Royal seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
May 2024
Hello, I'm Prince of Erebor. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Catherine, Princess of Wales have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at British princess, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Note that wives are already covered in the introduction: see the edits by User:Chamika1990 and myself. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:54, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- With respect I do not have to take instructions from you, Celia. My changes are factually correct. The wife of a British Prince does gain the rank and status as a Princess by marriage and this should be included in the opening paragraph. You are not the expert on all things royal. A relevant citation has now been added. Please do not remove. Debretts, a clearly reliable source more so than you, clearly states that there are two ways a person can become a Princess of the United Kingdom, either by birth (daughter or granddaughter of a sovereign) or by marriage. This citation is correct. 82.30.193.7 (talk) 15:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- What part of "Note that wives are already covered in the introduction: see the edits by User:Chamika1990 and myself." do you not understand? Wives are not mentioned anywhere in the letters patent. We do not need citations in the introduction for content already cited in the article body. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)