Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
::I did not upload this, so I would not know the real licensing. For now, though, should we make it Jackson’s main image ] (]) 17:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::I did not upload this, so I would not know the real licensing. For now, though, should we make it Jackson’s main image ] (]) 17:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Not without verifying it is free of copyright. ] (] / ]) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Not without verifying it is free of copyright. ] (] / ]) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::::A Tineye search shows this photo appearing on Alamy as a stock image. This means that it is almost certainly copyrighted. The image was uploaded by ] who is now indef blocked, and the claim of public domain always looked dodgy.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 17:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Revision as of 17:53, 25 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Jackson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning Michael Jackson.
To view an explanation to the answer, click the link to the right of the question.
Q1: Should the article mention reports that Michael Jackson was Muslim? (No.)
A1: No. The article should not mention reports that Michael Jackson was Muslim. Jackson had not publicly spoken about his exact religion in a number of years and only spoke about spirituality in general terms. The specific reports of a conversion ceremony for Jackson have been denied by his New York lawyer Londell McMillan. They were also denied by Yusuf Islam/Cat Stevens and Dawud Wharnsby who were allegedly present at the ceremony. The Michael Jackson memorial service did not involve any Islamic rites. Without further details from his family or representatives, it will not be included in the article.
Q2: Should the "Jacko" name be mentioned in the lead? (No.)
A2: No. The "Jacko" name should not be mentioned in the lead. Past consensus goes against such inclusion. The name is a derogatory term used primarily by US/UK/Australian tabloids. The slogan is discussed in the relevant section of the article.
Q3: Should the article mention that Jackson reportedly had cancer/blindness/liver disease/AIDS, etc.? (No.)
A3: No.
The article should not mention that Jackson reportedly had cancer, blindness, liver disease, AIDS, etc. Until such claims are confirmed by a Jackson representative it will not go in the article at all. These claims are largely fabricated by tabloids.
Q4: Should the article mention that Jackson reportedly had a secret child called Omer Bhatti? (No.)
A4: No.
This claim was denied by Bhatti and only a DNA test would resolve the matter.
Q5: Isn't Jackson the seventh child of the Jackson family, not the eighth? (No.)
A5: No.
Marlon had a twin, Brandon, who died shortly after birth. This makes Michael the eighth child.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Michael Jackson's religion was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 November 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Michael Jackson. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michael Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Michael Jackson on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Michael JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Michael JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Michael JacksonMichael Jackson
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Janet Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Janet Jackson and associated groups or individuals on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Janet JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Janet JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Janet JacksonJanet Jackson
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Misplaced Pages
Lorazepam and midazolam are both classified as benzodiazepines, so while both passages are technically correct they could use a rewrite to avoid confusion. 98.159.215.35 (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 July 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This a very minor request, instead of "Michael Jackson sold around 500 million records" it should be "Michael Jackson sold over 500 million records. All i want changed is one word Never17 (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi @TheWikiholic, you've (partially) reverted my edit, but (tbh) I don't see a clear consensus that philanthropist should be included in the first sentence and I'm still confused even though I did read this conversation. Its inclusion is definitely against MOS:ROLEBIO, which says, "In general, a position, activity, or role should not be included in the lead paragraph if: a) the role is not otherwise discussed in the lead (per MOS:LEAD, don't tease the reader) ..." Thedarkknightli (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would support removing "philanthropist" per MOS:ROLEBIO as it's not how Jackson is most commonly described by reliable sources and isn't what made him notable. Popcornfud (talk) 21:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I will not hide my stance on this issue given that I opened that discussion as a novice Wikipedian. Some of the points presented in that discussion include that the quantity of Jackson's donations was unprecedented for a pop star, to the point that they were recognized by Guinness, and that his philanthropy influenced future pop stars. RyanAl6 (talk) 00:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
We recently discussed this topic in greater detail, as shown here. We have a dedicated article on Jackson's philanthropy. Based on the aforementioned discussion, a summary of his philanthropic activities has been added to the body of this article under the "Philanthropy" section, although it has not yet been summarized in the lead TheWikiholic (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Guys, I would actually be fine with including "philanthropist" if we do summarize his philanthropy in the lead.
Michael Jackson is widely regarded as a notable philanthropist and humanitarian. His charity work is unprecedented, and his message of world peace is well known. I vote for keeping the term "philanthropist" in the lede. Israell (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Also, in the year 2000, Guinness World Records honoured Michael Jackson for supporting 39 charities, more than any other entertainer, and Michael donated over 500M to charity throughout his career. Israell (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I didn't say it was anecdotal, or non-notable. I'm saying it isn't one of the things he's most notable for. It probably isn't even in the top 3 (This is a high bar — MJ is one of the most notable people ever to exist.) Popcornfud (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I disagree for the aforesaid reasons. The very existence of Neverland makes it one of the things he's most notable for. Israell (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps one way to test this is to see what obituaries wrote about Jackson shortly after his death. Here are the first handful of reliable sources I came across: Guardian, NME,NYT, LA Times , Economist, Uncut, Times, Rolling Stone.
An initial scan through each of them don't reveal any mention of his philanthropic work. This suggests to me that it wasn't one of the things Jackson was most notable for, and therefore listing it in the lead sentence may be WP:UNDUE and not meet the requirements of WP:ROLEBIO, which have been stated above.
We can't make decisions about notability based on what Misplaced Pages pages exist, because Misplaced Pages obviously can't be used to indicate notability. (I mean, we also have a page on Bubbles the chimpanzee — should we mention him in the lead sentence too?) We can't make decisions about notability based on whether Neverland (or anything else) exists, because Misplaced Pages is based on reliable secondary sources. Popcornfud (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Neverland Ranch is perhaps the worst example anyone can point to about his supposed Philanthrophy. That Ranch is associated with most (if not all) of his pedophilia and child sex abuse allegations, including one related to an upcoming trial which is pending a date. If guilt is established at the most recent trial (for alleged crimes prior to his death), would we still include his ranch activities under philanthrophy? It would asinine to do so. Notability is what most people (the general public, not die hard fans) associate with an individual. Philanthropy is really pushing it and its not something he is widely known for. And some of his "philanthrophic" activities such as the ranch are questionable at best, and perhaps even criminal. Instantwatym (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Jackson was proven innocent and there was no evidence ever found that he was guilty of any crime. Was he weird? Yes, he's one of the most famous people ever and his circumstances his entire life was abnormal. Most people do not care about these false accusations and the average person living in Africa, Europe, Latin America or islands in the middle of nowhere listening to him have never heard of them.
His few "accusers" were people who went on record defending him and then later contradicting their previous testimonies and claiming retroactively abuse happened after being offered money for their stories. "Child Sex abuse accusations against Michael Jackson ruled unfounded after month long investigation". This was the same case he went to court on, during this investigation which followed Living with Michael Jackson he was in Miami Florida during the majority of the period. He met the family in 2000, the accusations claimed that he waited 3 years after meeting them only until he got backlash for the Bashir interview and was under investigation for a crime before actually committing the crime. They changed their story in July of 2003, claiming they were actually being abused by Jackson during the period he was under a criminal investigation. Which is complete nonsense. If that isn't enough the DA who had a clear vendetta literally performed a illegal raid of Jackson's attorney's offices, got a copy of this memo and then retroactively changed the dates of the sexual abuse accusations and added more charges including a conspiracy charge even though Jackson was the only person allegedly involved in the conspiracy.
This is pure nonsense and rightfully got thrown out of court. With the Jurors stating on video a few years ago "The Prosecution had no evidence, what little case they had was tainted by the District Attorney" Never17 (talk) 06:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I only brought that up in response to someone saying that one example of his philanthropy is a place linked to most of his child sex abuse allegations. The dispute at hand is whether to define this individual as a philanthrophist in the first line of the lead. I don't think so because his philanthropic activities are something that vast majority of individuals are familiar with. His notability among most people is as a singer, dancer, entertainer, etc.
P.S. Since the allegations were brought up, it is a fact that there is an active case that is proceeding trial. One could argue that it should be mentioned in the 3rd paragraph of the lead, because the way the lead is written currently implies that he has been cleared of any and all wrongdoing and does not have an active case. Instantwatym (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes he settled in 1993 and that fucked him up since even though he was cleared it opened the door for grifters to sell their stories to the media in exchange for cash Never17 (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
While I'm not sure how one can convict or even sue a dead person, it is true that having an article dedicated to something doesn't automatically warrant a mention in the lead, and we shouldn't exclusively follow what fans associate with the guy. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
There are multiple reliable secondary sources discussing Jackson's philanthropy and humanitarian work, as well can see here and here . Numerous sources are also available in non-English languages. This extensive coverage is precisely why Jackson's philanthropic efforts have a standalone article. A standalone article does not necessarily mean it must be included in the lead, but it clearly indicates the significance of his humanitarian contributions.
According to the Guinness Book of World Records, Jackson supported more charities than any other entertainer. Some estimates suggest that he donated over $500 million to charities, which is more than any other entertainer. Additionally, his will stipulates that 20% of his earnings and 20% of his assets are allocated to charity. His estate is currently worth more than $2 billion, further establishing Jackson as one of the most prolific philanthropist and humanitarian in history.
According to WP:ROLEBIO, a position, activity, or role should generally not be included in the lead paragraph if it is not otherwise discussed in the lead.
And here we have the 2019 version of the articles lead states: "He traveled the world attending events honoring his humanitarianism, and, in 2000, Guinness World Records recognized him for supporting 39 charities, more than any other entertainer."TheWikiholic (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I personally believe his philanthropy should be included as a part of his description. His humanitarianism is woven into his music and what Michael Jackson was most proud of. He became a significant humanitarian figure during the start of the Dangerous era (1991-onwards) and during the 1990s he was at the peak of his fame and popularity meeting with world leaders on a regular basis on the subject of his humanitarian work Never17 (talk) 06:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I saw a pic on MJ's zhwiki main template and frankly looked better than that pic on the current main template on enwiki, so i think we can change that pic to this on the left. Coddlebean (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Editors disagree about whether a Guardian review of MJ the Musical should be included in "Critical response" section of the MJ the Musical article. More voices would be appreciated. Thanks. Popcornfud (talk) 13:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The image in the infobox is low quality and grainy. I have found a good alternative to it, taken at (arguably) Michael Jackson’s peak. Shall we use this as the replacement?Wcamp9 (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
This looks doubtful as a public domain image. It seems to be a publicity photo and is probably copyrighted.--♦IanMacM♦06:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I did not upload this, so I would not know the real licensing. For now, though, should we make it Jackson’s main image Wcamp9 (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
A Tineye search shows this photo appearing on Alamy as a stock image. This means that it is almost certainly copyrighted. The image was uploaded by User:ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter who is now indef blocked, and the claim of public domain always looked dodgy.--♦IanMacM♦17:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
view · edit Frequently asked questions
level-3 vital article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
Already done It looks like you have since become extended-confirmed and made the change in this edit. Left guide (talk) 02:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)