| Revision as of 11:39, 30 August 2024 editRsjaffe (talk | contribs)Administrators55,945 edits Notice: Adding inappropriate entries to lists on List of jurists.Tag: Twinkle | Revision as of 15:17, 30 August 2024 edit undoRsjaffe (talk | contribs)Administrators55,945 edits Warning: Edit warring on List of jurists.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Hello. Your recent edit to ] appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list ] a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Misplaced Pages's ] guideline. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-badlistentry --> — ] ] 11:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | ] Hello. Your recent edit to ] appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list ] a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Misplaced Pages's ] guideline. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-badlistentry --> — ] ] 11:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ] Hi Pavancse67779! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of ] several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the ] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. | |||
| All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article ] to try to reach ]. If you are unable to agree at ], please use one of the ] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> — ] ] 15:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:17, 30 August 2024
August 2024
Hello. Your recent edit to List of jurists appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Misplaced Pages's notability guideline. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 11:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Pavancse67779! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of jurists several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of jurists, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)