Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dennis Brown: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:43, 2 September 2024 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,932 edits Administrators' newsletter – September 2024: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit Revision as of 15:54, 6 September 2024 edit undoBorgenland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers92,510 edits Courtesy notice: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 88: Line 88:
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 18:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)</small>}} -->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 18:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1242830842 --> <!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1242830842 -->

== Courtesy notice ==

Hello! I used your previous warning against an POV editor on to a similar editor on ] mostly using the same template you had: . Since I am not sure if posting that warning violates copyvio and also because the degree to which the article had been POV-vandalized is also comparable, I am notifying you of this to ask for your understanding. ] (]) 15:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:54, 6 September 2024

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48



This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
WIKIBREAK - I'm extending my break beyond my original plans. I may pop in and do a few little things, or make an edit or two as an IP (I try to sign the summary with "-db" most of the time) but mainly staying away. As I approach my 18th anniversary of being an editor (12 of them as admin), I'm debating what level of activity, if any, I want for the future.

Obviously there are tons of new articles that can be written, but the most basic core articles (the stuff that matters for primary and secondary english educational purposes) now exist and have for some time. That was the reason I got involved in 2006, and now editing is more about maintenance, as well as dealing with spam and vandalism. In many ways, Misplaced Pages is a victim of it's own success (including financial), and I'm not convinced it is the best use of my altruistic time anymore. We will see.

-db
Barnstars given to me since 2012

UTRS appeal #90559

Any thoughts on their claim that sock account you blocked is not them? Feel free to comment on the request. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

0xDeadbeef, is the AFD that caused the sockblock. Penepi was blocked a final time at 14:19 on 31 DEC 23. BRZ8 made his two contributions at 22:50 & 22:56 on the same day shortly after the final indef block. BRZ8 was blocked a couple hours later, by me, after these two contribs. . As I said on Penepi's page; "Could be a Joe Job, but I'm pretty sure that BRZ8 is a sock of Penepi." and nothing has changed my opinion. The evidence isn't "overwhelming", but it consistent with socking, albeit, it is a very limited amount of evidence. After reading the UTRS appeal, I understand why you might want to consider a second chance. Like all second chances, there is a degree of risk, but reblocks are cheap. With that in mind, I wouldn't object to an unblock if you feel the risk is worth it. Consider me neutral, neither supporting nor opposing. There is enough question about the connection, and the person does seem sincere about moving forward. Whether they have the discipline to stick to their promises is something only time will tell. Dennis Brown - 08:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

"Chondath" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chondath has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Chondath until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

Hello! I used your previous warning against an POV editor on to a similar editor on Joy Bernos mostly using the same template you had: . Since I am not sure if posting that warning violates copyvio and also because the degree to which the article had been POV-vandalized is also comparable, I am notifying you of this to ask for your understanding. Borgenland (talk) 15:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)