| Revision as of 05:49, 23 September 2024 editSomeguywhosbored (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users824 edits →Question about WP:RAJ.: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:12, 23 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sitush/Archive 33) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please ] check it. | This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please ] check it. | ||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 03:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Earlier Pages Thiyya, Thiyyas are redirected now a new page by changing the spelling to ] == | |||
| Hi @], I see that you have dealt with this issue multiple times. | |||
| Thiyya and Ezhava are considered as synonymous by Misplaced Pages and all admins and majority of editors, and this was already discussed multiple times and are included in the main page ] , However a small group from both sides seems to claim that both are separate . | |||
| This has been overly discussed every year from 2012 ownwards(almost every year) and the final decision was or ] was that both are synonymous from the ] Sources . (Please see the links ) | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| In addition to that multiple accounts in the name thiyya, thiyyas , tiyyas etc were created previously claiming that these are distinct from ], However in all cases the ] was that all these pages in the names "thiyya,tiyyas,thiyyas were permanently redirected to the page ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| However now a new page ] is being created (or lifted redirect ) , pointing to the same people Thiyya/Thiyyas simply by changing the spelling of the name Thiyya to "Tiyyar". | |||
| From the logs I can see that you have already given a warning to user -"HariNellatt" (see link) ] a month ago who was disruptively lifting the redirect without any further discussions. | |||
| Isn't this a mockery of the system that already such a ] was made regarding this and the pages were permanently redirected to the main page], but simply new pages are being created by changing the spellings pointing to the same group thiyya. | |||
| I think this also need to be either moved to a draftspace or need to be permanently redirected similar to thiyya and thiyyas as multiple people are simply lifting the redirect with different claims , just like what happended with older pages thiyya and thiyyas ] (]) 02:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] Another one in the name "thiyar" is sent as draft . | |||
| :An ongoing issue of randomly lifting the redirect (only temporarily solved ) is also happening in recent ] | |||
| :The irony is that these groups have again submitted another draft in the name "Thiyar" making similar claims and pointing to similar people . link - ] , that means 6 th duplicate copy "Thiyar" is being created after "thiyya,tiyyas,thiyyas,thiyyar and Tiyyar | |||
| :My humble question is what is a permanent solution for this ?? They are simply changing the spelling and coming up with the same contents and talking about the same people. ] , this is been discussed since a long time. Again is there any permanent solution to this ? I am amazed to see , How such a credible platform is being exploited by these groups simply by changing the spellings. ] (]) 15:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | ==Happy First Edit Day!== | ||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 23 September 2024
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Sitush! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |  |
Howdy
Sitush--how are you doing, old friend? We're all dinosaurs now, and we were so smart and cute when we first got here. At least I was. If you're around, and you have a moment, maybe you can have a look at this. These are odd edits, I think. Thanks, and take care-- Drmies (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind: I saw reason to check, and boom, there we go! Drmies (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Question about WP:RAJ.
Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does User:Sitush/CasteSources apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @Sitush Someguywhosbored (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)