Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:44, 25 September 2024 editNebY (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,852 edits RNIB: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 14:37, 25 September 2024 edit undoBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,255 edits RNIB: rpNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


I'm finding your pblock of {{noping|GDX420}} all the more appropriate the more I engage with the ] article. Apart from content issues, it's striking that since mentioning "an allegation of “sexually abusive practice”", I find no more such allegation mentioned in our sources, including the Charity Commission's report, or in a brief online search, yet GDX420 repeatedly made such allegations in their edit summaries (e.g.,, – I'll not repeat them). Are such summaries candidates for revdel? Posting here rather than at ANI so as not to draw attention if they are. ] (]) 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC) I'm finding your pblock of {{noping|GDX420}} all the more appropriate the more I engage with the ] article. Apart from content issues, it's striking that since mentioning "an allegation of “sexually abusive practice”", I find no more such allegation mentioned in our sources, including the Charity Commission's report, or in a brief online search, yet GDX420 repeatedly made such allegations in their edit summaries (e.g.,, – I'll not repeat them). Are such summaries candidates for revdel? Posting here rather than at ANI so as not to draw attention if they are. ] (]) 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
* I have rev-deleted the worst of them. ] 14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:37, 25 September 2024


"And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit
Black Kite
Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on.
For Talk Page Archives, click here.
If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly.

Request to re-open discussion at WT:FOOTY

Hello! I see that you closed the discussion at WT:FOOTY regarding the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup. The user primarily arguing for the change has continued their arguments at Talk:FIFA Club World Cup, including making this change right after the discussion was closed. I believe we may have more to discuss and was hoping you would re-open that conversation so that we can keep everything together in one place. Jay eyem (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

RNIB

I'm finding your pblock of GDX420 all the more appropriate the more I engage with the Royal National Institute of Blind People article. Apart from content issues, it's striking that since a 2018 Guardian report mentioning "an allegation of “sexually abusive practice”", I find no more such allegation mentioned in our sources, including the Charity Commission's report, or in a brief online search, yet GDX420 repeatedly made such allegations in their edit summaries (e.g.,, – I'll not repeat them). Are such summaries candidates for revdel? Posting here rather than at ANI so as not to draw attention if they are. NebY (talk) 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)